Florida Court Realizes Its Mistake, Reverses Order For Ripoff Report To Take Down Content
from the good-to-see dept
At the beginning of January, we wrote about a troubling court ruling in Florida, where a judge ordered XCentric, the operators of Ripoff Report, to remove some content from their website, despite the company's policy against such removals and the clear and well-established safe harbors for Ripoff Report from Section 230. There were some serious problems with this ruling beyond just the Section 230 questions, including the prior restraint issue, whereby content was ordered taken offline despite the lack of a full evidentiary hearing on the merits.Thankfully, the judge who made this clearly incorrect ruling was not re-elected, and the case was handed off to another judge who quickly righted the wrong, noting that Ripoff Report was clearly protected by Section 230 of the CDA. Perhaps even more interesting is that Paul Alan Levy, who was preparing an amicus brief for the appeal, was able to get his hands on the original transcripts of the hearing and highlights just how troubling the initial ruling was on a prior restraint basis, in that the order was not based on any findings of the likelihood of success of the original defamation claims:
The transcript of the hearing at which the original TRO against the author was adopted is particularly revealing. The order was not based on any findings of likelihood of success that the author would be found liable on the defamation claims; everybody understood that the only objective was to facilitate an order against XCentric. The author never conceded that she was even negligent in making her statement that Giordano was a convicted felon, not to speak of acting with actual malice as would be required for a judgment of defamation assuming that Giordano is a public figure. Indeed, there was some suggestion that Giordano had told the author that he had previously been in trouble with the law. So, perhaps he was a felon, just not a convicted felon? The author apparently stood by everything else she had said about Giordano; yet the judge ordered XCentric to take the entire statement down because, the judge said, he didn't want to be involved in editing the statement.And this is exactly part of the problem. The judge was in such a rush to shut down the content, no effort was made to determine if there was a true legal basis for removing the content.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, injunctions, section 230
Companies: ripoff report, xcentric
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Judge
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sheer Laziness
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Nice way of destroying any reasonable debate.
Your "talk" reminds me of the abortion debate. How do you suddenly turn everything around to make the "other side" look like terrible monsters?
Easy: Call one side "Pro-Life", and the other side "Pro-Choice". It's impossible to choose a side, because the implication is that you are either a murderer or a fascist.
End result: People shut up, they are too afraid to take sides and become much easier to manipulate. Mission accomplished.
Work both sides for....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I agree with you Ed..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fahq
And what happens when you report ripoffreport? Bet they delete it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wabtching over my friends
I have lots of friends that do inventions
I want to tell them about you and your ripoffreport.com
I take care of my friend
Well I try to do that Ed
Your a great man lets talk Roger Rhodes FB
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fahq
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hidden adoption
[ link to this | view in thread ]
R.I.P. Dear Brother
Ex-girlfriends and ex-employees took to ripoffreport.com to get revenge.
The posts haunted him every single day, for years. He simply couldn't move forward. He legally changed his name in 2009, in an attempt to hide from this website, but even that didn't fix it.
He was unable to work, have a serious relationship, or move forward after these posts were made. My brother never recovered from these posts.
After years of struggling to recover, he simply couldn't do it any longer. He took his own life on 12/14/2011 in Orlando, FL. He referenced these posts many times in his final words. These posts haunted him daily.
I hope my reply makes people think about the damage that can be done by posting negative things on the internet about another person. Everyone has feelings, and they are real.
My brother will be buried sometime next week.
R.I.P. Dear Brother.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: R.I.P. Dear Brother
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Shameless
My heart goes out to the man that lost his brother..shame on them..they have to live with the truth of what they.did.
Sites like this are very danguros..Check out the facts.and never put a post up that harms anyone..in fact who in the hell does this person thinks he is? By putting this site up he has proberly hurt a lot of ppl..
Why don't we put up a site just on him? Let him knows what it feels like BUT no..we would be just a asshole like him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]