Can You Copyright Pi? Lawsuit Filed Over Copyright On Pi Symphony
from the copyrighting-pi dept
You may recall that last month, we wrote about a bizarre and silly dispute concerning two different composers who had each written a song based on the number pi. The more recent song, done by Michael Blake, was set up pretty simply:He decided the song would be in C, then assigned each note a number: C=1, D=2 and so on up through 9. Using those assignments, he played the sequence of pi: 3.14159 through 31 decimal places. He assigned numbers to chords, too, but could only play the chords every other note and still make it sound vaguely musical.Another guy, named Lars Erickson, apparently came up with something similar back in 1992, and even went so far as to register a copyright on the output. Blake had posted a video on YouTube of his version, and Erickson issued a takedown. Erickson, in talking about this, admitted that he only took action because he was upset that someone removed comments about his song on the YouTube page with Blake's song. Of course, we doubted this would ever go so far as an actual lawsuit. We were wrong. Billy Wenge-Murphy alerts us to the news that following Blake's counternotice and YouTube's reinstatement of the video, Erickson has sued. You can see his filing below.
Finally, he used pi as the basis for the tempo -- it's 157 beats per minute, which is half of 314.
I'm a bit surprised Erickson's lawyers didn't talk him out of this. It's hard to see how he has anything approaching a legitimate copyright claim. After all, Judge Learned Hand famously explained that if two people come up with the same content independently, without copying one another, there is no copyright issue:
... if by some magic a man who had never known it were to compose anew Keats's Ode on a Grecian Urn, he would be an "author," and, if he copyrighted it, others might not copy that poem, though they might of course copy Keats's.Assuming Blake did not copy Erickson, there's simply no issue at all. Of course, even if he did copy Erickson, there are reasonable questions as to what in Erickson's song is actually copyrightable. Obviously, the concept of a song based on pi is not, because you can't copyright ideas. The actual song parts based on pi are not, because Erickson does not own pi. The only thing that might qualify for a copyright could be specific creative choices that Erickson made, but it's unclear if Blake copied any of those. And, in fact, nothing in the legal filing (embedded below) delves into that issue at all. Erickson, instead, seems to assume (falsely) that only he can make music based on pi.
The key point that Erickson seems to be relying on is the idea that he has "lost revenue" due to Blake's work. That, of course, is silly. First of all, writing a song based on Pi cannot and is not Erickson's exclusive idea. And, seriously, what "revenue" was he losing here? Erickson also complains about how Blake's work "dilutes the market," but this isn't a trademark dispute, and I don't see how competition in the market with a different song violates copyright law.
I can't see this lawsuit getting very far at all, and it's really quite amazing that Erickson went through with it. Surely, someone somewhere along the way must have explained copyright law to him, right?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
What a square.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The case will be open forever
Although Erickson's lawyers seem to be a bit opportunities they might want to valid and check the validity of Pi to it natural conclusion too. The legal bill should be as long as Pi.
Any else feel like having a pie for lunch now?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Copyrighting pi?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is that even possible?
"I'm a bit surprised Erickson's lawyers didn't talk him out of this."
He waved money in font of them...
What would be good but probably won't happen is for the judge to send him and his attorney running for cover. But I fear the the Judge will play along with the charade
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
Are you serious? Lawyers wanna get paid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You can't copyright mathematical formulae
Then again - since the digits of pi contain (somewhere in the sequence) the digital form of every work ever copyrighted - you shouldn't be able to copyright anything...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Transcendental stupidity
This is another example of why there needs to be a clear penalty for those who tie up the legal system with frivolous suits filed to simply harass someone.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A lawsuit over Pi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Conflict of Interest
Now, some lawyers actually take their professional ethics seriously and will persuade their clients not to file baseless suits, but that still leaves plenty of scope to shop around until you find a slightly less ethical one willing to profit by indulging your misplaced sense of outrage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1 year later
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copyrighting pi?
[ link to this | view in thread ]