If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- State Department Report Repeats Talking Points From Group Who Wants To Ban All Porn
- Indonesian Court Gives The Government Permission To Pull The Plug On The Internet Whenever It Feels Threatened
- Josh Hawley: The War On Men (?) Is Driving Them To Porn And Video Games (Things Many Men Like?)
- Utah Legislature Wraps Up Session By Passing Two Unconstitutional Internet Bills
- Attacks On Internet Free Speech In Malaysia And Indonesia Demonstrate Why Section 230 Is So Important
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But who's really to blame here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But who's really to blame here...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How could such a thing happen......?
That iPad must have been malfunctioning! Yes, that's it. *nodnod*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You know what that means?
We all know how much he has crusaded against it.
(While I agree its bad, I think he wrongly targeted tech companies when they are obviously not the cause of it)
After all, he even wanted a big database of it. Seems quite suspicious now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ban the iPad now!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ban the iPad now!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Special Case
Or maybe, just maybe he was being shown the porn so that he see that his legislation wasn't working?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Special Case
New rule: if your constituency is made up of roughly half men over the age of 16, you don't get to try to pretend that they're in favor of any law reducing the amount of bouncing meat bags and vaginas they can see. Ever.
That is all....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Special Case
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But....but...but...
I am willing to bet it was illegally downloaded too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember, politicians don't actually lobby for what they believe in. It's who's paying the bills, and how they're going to keep their position that they're concerned with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clarification
It's not simply a matter of politicians trying to prevent others from enjoying what they themselves enjoy. It's that there are people who want to hold themselves to a high standard and discover they can't do it by themselves. In the case of "porn", a person may disapprove of it and want to refrain from looking at it themselves, but the temptation turns out to be stronger than their willpower. These folks need external controls to make up for their insufficient self-control.
When these folks hold political office, I suspect many of them rationalize this way: Porn is bad/wrong, therefore it should be prohibited.
The fact that they disapprove of it, publicly or privately, has nothing to do with their own lack self-control.
From this perspective, their political position not elitism or hypocritical, it's just poor reasoning based on personal values. The problem isn't their personal values, it's their poor reasoning on civil governance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AH! That is really awful!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AH! That is really awful!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real comments on the issue
and oh, by the way, watch what you say about Stevie Boy Jobs and Apple, me thinks the device in the photo is not a iPad, so Apple may come after you!:-P
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/04/09/pks-quiz-arifinto-pornography-claims.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]