Anti-SLAPP Law Protects Kardashian Sisters After They Trashed Debit Card Business Partner
from the free-speech-for-all dept
The Kardashian sisters, who are among the current crop of celebrities who appear to be famous for being famous, got a lot of extra (negative) attention last fall when the press started reporting on the ridiculous fees that were found on "The Kardashian Kard," a new debit card that the women had put their name on, and for which they got a cut of any profits. As the negative publicity piled on, the Kardashians pulled out of the deal and shut down the card. The company behind the actual card (Revenue Resource Group) then sued the Kardashians, claiming breach of contract and that the Kardashians themselves were responsible for $75 million in damages, and the destruction of the entire company. Of course, it seems worth pointing out that only 250 people actually got the card in the time it was available...While this might sound like a basic breach of contract lawsuit, apparently the Kardashians' lawyers successfully turned it into a free speech issue, and were able to use California's excellent anti-SLAPP law to not just get the lawsuit dismissed, but to put Revenue Resource Group on the hook for attorneys' fees as well:
“We do not have a mere breach of contract action here, seeking recovery from the Kardashians of the contract damages for their breach of same,” [Judge Jeffrey] Hamilton writes in an 8-page order... “Instead, we have an attempt to also charge the defendants with loss of all other business unrelated to them, specifically tied to defendants’ exercise of free speech.”As a fan of anti-SLAPP laws, this is an interesting ruling for a variety of reasons. It makes me wonder if we'll see more clashes between contract claims and First Amendment rights...
The judge then finds that the credit card company likely can’t prove that the Kardashians ruined its business. “Plaintiff alleges that is (sic) was the publicity that killed off its business and ran off other potential celebrity clients,” the judgment states. “But it was not merely the Kardashian termination letter that did it – it was the onslaught of negative coverage before and after their statement about the fees and charges associated with the card. In other words, the product’s features themselves caused the problem once they became clearer to the public.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-slapp, debit cards, free speech, kardashians
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
On the flip side, it seems they didn't bother to actually understand what the hell they were pasting their names onto either. They failed in that responsibility unless they were outright lied to by the debit card company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kim and company
They have signed on for many things, famous for being famous. If they signed the contract, they should be bound to it. Of course the debit card company sounds pretty shady, so maybe there is a whore battle going on.
I just don't like them, don't have any respect for people sucking money off the teat of the trailer parks of America from people who wish they were as "glamorous" as the Kardisian whores.
My opinioin is free speech here!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CA anti-SLAPP laws
I am a panelist giving anti-SLAPP seminars for Lawyers at Rutter Group, Pincus and others. I have been teaching anti-SLAPP law at University of San Diego School of law since 2001 and have been specializing in SLAPP cases for both sides since 1994. I have argued a SLAPP cases before the California Supreme Court. See www.slapplaw.com
James J. Moneer, Esq.
www.slapplaw.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]