DailyDirt: Universal Translators Would Be Nice

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Just about every science fiction story that involves aliens has to come up with some way for different languages to be translated and understood. Babel Fish, C3PO and Star Trek's "universal translator" all served this purpose. But, it would be revolutionary for technology just to translate between different human languages. Here are some quick links on the topic of communication research. By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: aliens, dolphins, language, translation
Companies: seti


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 4:40pm

    I think SETI's bet is a good one regarding mathematics. I suppose its entirely possible that there could be a sentient being with such a drastically different way of conceptualizing its existence that it doesn't have any concept of math that's analogous to ours - but in that case it seems impossible that we could communicate with them, and indeed unlikely that we would even recognize each other's sentience.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Esahc (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 5:23pm

    Temba, his arms wide!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 5:54pm

    Re:

    Esahc, you understand Tamarian... :)

    Picard and Dathon at El-Adrel!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Esahc (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 6:06pm

    Re: Re:

    One of the best TNG episodes ever!

    Sokath, his eyes uncovered.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 6:26pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Also one of the most divisive - a lot of people hate it, I suppose because they can't get over the inherent silliness of the dialogue. But too bad for them, because it is indeed awesome.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2011 @ 7:21pm

    All TNG is awesome. Having said that, I don't think math is the answer to universal language. Addition and subtraction, maybe. But do you really think the aliens are out there taking square roots of negative numbers, and calling the answer imaginary? Negative numbers are already imaginary! Only humans inflict such ridiculousness upon themselves, and then pretend it is somehow objective and universal.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 8:21pm

    Re:

    It's not about addition and subtraction or imaginary numbers or anything. That comes later.

    The point lies in a simple concept: the idea of one.

    That is the only thing that we can reasonably expect to have in common with another sentient life form, since that is essentially our definition of sentience: the ability to recognize one's self as separate from one's environment. From that recognition springs the actual conceptualization of separate objects, and thus it forms the basis of all consciousness and communication.

    Once you have "one" you realize you have two and three and four as well - but we use arbitrary symbols for those, so we can't use them as a basis of communication. However, establishing a symbology for 1 and not-1 (or zero) seems like something that can be done across language barriers - thus the choice of binary code for this communication.

    Once you have "one" any advanced species is likely to arrive at all the same mathematical concepts we have (after all, we had most of the core ones figured out long before we even conceived of radio waves or any other form of long-distance communication) - and yes that includes imaginary numbers, or a different mechanism for representing what they represent. They may seem rather strange because they occupy a weird spot that is sort of shoe-horned into our symbology - indeed it is possible that another species would have developed a system in which they are more intuitive - but they are not arbitrary: they represent an inevitable consequence of numbers - inevitable all the way back to that initial idea of "one"

    There is another TNG in which Picard taps out prime numbers on a keypad to ensure his unseen captors know he is intelligent and not simply an animal of some sort. That is a very significant idea: prime numbers are something that would be impossible to not notice once you start multiplying and dividing, so regardless of what names you give to all these things, someone counting out "1, 3, 5, 7, 11" would be a recognizable pattern.

    Math is a funny thing, because it is both arbitrary and not arbitrary. Many of the "rules" are indeed invented by people - but they are not invented just for fun, they are invented to create a consistent system for describing patterns. One great quote about math: "the fun thing about your creations is that they talk back". And that's just the point: the moment you have the idea of "one", it begins talking back to you, and demanding a more complex language for the dialogue - so before long you have prime numbers and imaginary numbers and limits and set theory and all that other fun stuff.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Jul 2011 @ 8:36pm

    This thread is now about watermelons

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 9:01pm

    Re:

    Seedless or regular?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    PlagueSD (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 10:15pm

    Re: Re:

    Green.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 13 Jul 2011 @ 11:38pm

    Re: Re:

    Wow, I had no idea Techdirt readers were so well-versed in ST:TNG.. :)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    DOlz (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 1:18am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    My problem with the episode was not the dialog, but the unworkability of the concept. Each phrase encapsulated a complex concept. During their childhood they must have learned the background to these phrases in simpler terms and they should have retained the concept of "dumbing things down". In fact they are shown they still have that ability in that episode when Picard tells the story of Gilgamesh.

    My favorite STNG episode was "Who Watches the Watchers", geek mode off.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Rekrul, 14 Jul 2011 @ 1:20am

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Shaka, when the walls fell.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Rekrul, 14 Jul 2011 @ 1:23am

    Re: Re: Re:

    And DS9, ST:V & Enterprise.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 5:29am

    Re:

    This thread is bananas...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 6:30am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I admit that, in the details of the episode, the concept wouldn't really work. But the concept is a real one: even within human languages, we find some that structure and conceptualize ideas in such drastically different ways that there are major barriers to communication.

    It would be pretty much impossible to actually convey the journey from total alienation to understanding within a 45-minute episode, which is why the concept of the episode itself had to be dumbed down to make it work as a TV show, even if it doesn't quite work as a realistic depiction. Overall, I think it did a good job of conveying the underlying idea.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 6:30am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    And yeah, "Who Watches" is better, and in fact one of the best - no argument there.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 6:32am

    Re: Re: Re:

    No Enterprise for me like the comment above, but yeah, I'm a pretty big fan :)

    Also, as my longwinded comment no doubt makes apparent, I really enjoy musing about concepts like this...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    Nicedoggy, 14 Jul 2011 @ 6:38am

    What nobody remembered ST: Voyager: Blink Of An Eye?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  20. icon
    Marcus Carab (profile), 14 Jul 2011 @ 7:07am

    Re:

    Heh - I have such mixed feelings about that episode. On one hand, the concept is awesome - I love the idea of the whole culture and religion being built around the "skyship" which is only there for a few hours.

    On the other hand, they really go off the rails with the logic of it sometimes. When the aliens launched their first rocket, why did they think it disappeared? Didn't they see it getting slower and slower then near-freezing in the sky as it approached Voyager?

    Heh... we should actually probably stop this conversation before it starts :D

    link to this | view in thread ]

  21. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2011 @ 8:15am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Damn it. I came here to say this. You beat me to it.

    Oh and oblig. XKCD:
    http://xkcd.com/902/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  22. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jul 2011 @ 9:00am

    Re:

    This thread is pants.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.