Author Of 'Go The F**k To Sleep' Says Piracy Helped Him... But He Doesn't Support It
from the it-supports-you... dept
Last month, we wrote about how the children's book for adults, Go the F**k to Sleep, became a bestseller and got a movie deal and tons of attention in large part due to the fact that it was being "pirated" like crazy. The PDF and scanned images of the book were everywhere. I was sent the PDF by at least a dozen people -- most of whom are not people involved in file sharing or infringement in any way. It was just one of those cultural phenomenons that everyone was passing around. At the time, we noted how ridiculous it was that the publisher was still claiming it had to take down those copies. After all, it seemed pretty clear that those "copies" helped make the book such a huge success.In an interview with Rafe Needleman at CNET, the book's author, Adam Mansbach, still appears somewhat conflicted about the whole thing. He jokes about how their attempt to stop the copies shows how "web savvy" they were, and then admits that after a week or so, they stopped when they realized it was clearly helping sales. The lightbulb moment was when they asked someone to take down the work, and the guy told them "Ok, If you want, but 300 people asked me where I could get the book." But... he still can't seem to bring himself to admit that this can work for others:
"It helped us," he says, "but it would have hurt most people. We had a perfect storm. The idea of pirating I don't want to be too romantic about or supportive of."Why? Why would it have hurt most people? It would hurt people if the book was bad and uninteresting, sure. But is that a problem? It might hurt people who don't have a good way to then sell the book. But if you set things up correctly, where's the harm?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adam mansbach, go the fuck to sleep, piracy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Correlation
Anyhow, I think that's the clinching detail on why publishers believe such ignorant drivel: they feel they have no control over 'piracy' and therefore maintain a superstitious belief that "something must be done."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Correlation
That's what the "old guard" of media have tried to instill in the new generation: "faith" that the old system is still the best system and that the "mean old Internet" is nothing but "piracy everywhere" and that nobody wants to buy things via the Internet.
The gatekeepers are doing everything they can to close the gate that got busted open by the Internet, even if it means resorting to FUD to convince authors that piracy cannot be beneficial in any way, shape, or form (when experience has proven otherwise in many, many cases).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because Mike Masnick is fully in favor of piracy.
He's just too much of a slimy coward to come out and say it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Cue the even more petty and superfluous remark in 3..2..1...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Says the anonymous coward.....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Slimy Cowards
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
After all, since you contend that piracy is always evil and wrong, I am assuming you are opposed to his success, and that you think he should be pursuing lawsuits right now instead of embracing it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's ok, it looks like he may have pirated some stuff for the book himself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's ok, it looks like he may have pirated some stuff for the book himself.
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The maxim of publicity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It certainly got a ton of free publicity and I buy the argument that in this case piracy helped him get more money than he might have otherwise. I'd back him though if he decided to fight it at this point because that is his right, and I have no problem defending their rights. I'm not saying that that's a good idea. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I don't actually know (or care). I respect whatever choice he makes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because Mike Masnick is fully in favor of piracy.
He's just too much of a slimy coward to come out and say it.
Without piracy your industry cronies wouldn't have made a dime on this book
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110621/03371114785/author-go-fk-to-sleep-says-piracy- helped-him-he-doesnt-support-it.shtml#c57
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it's all about scale
There's still a big leap to go from being happy about the new friends and issuing a blanket invitation for everyone on Facebook to come crash your party.
It's one thing to be cool about a few poor students lifting a copy of the book and it's an entirely different thing to announce to the world that piracy is a-okay and everyone should do it. In the first example, the theft is manageable and the book still produces revenue. In the second, only the suckers pay for the book.
This site continues to blithely believe that people will cough up good money when they can get an officially sanctioned "pirated copy" for free.
The fact is that if you celebrate piracy for one, you've got to be fair to everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it's all about scale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: it's all about scale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: it's all about scale
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it's all about scale
In part because this has been shown to be true again and again and again. As counter-intuitive as you may find it, people do cough up good money for things they can get for free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: it's all about scale
No, bob, this site continues to show that people will cough up good money if there is added value or even if it is simply in a format that is desired at a reasonable price, in spite of there being "pirated copies" out there for free.
Did you even read the article? It's right there, there in black & white text:
...became a bestseller and got a movie deal and tons of attention in large part due to the fact that it was being "pirated" like crazy.
More sales because it was shared. Even the author and publisher acknowledged that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm confident enough to say that if he continues being open-minded, he will eventually change his viewpoint. He's not hostile, just cautious, and I will certainly endorse that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So the author just admitted to gaining money by piracy...
Sure, they're "his" gains, but "piracy" in any form is "wrong"!
There ought to be a law to seize all proceeds from piracy (no matter the source or destination), and there will be once governments discover how much money they can get their hand on from the trumped up overly inflated numbers directly from anti-piracy organizations. Wait until copyright holders have to start paying a special "piracy profit tax" subject to numbers made up from some government organization, then we'll hear the real pigs begin to squeal.
How is that for an unforeseeable consequence?
As Nixon said, "When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal", this author implies, "When I, the copyright owner/author profits from piracy, that means it is not illegal, it's free advertising, and doesn't cost me for tax purposes unless I make a profit."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Piracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Piracy
Wow, do you read articles before making comments? This one's based on a quote from an author saying very clearly that piracy helped sales. I'll take his word over yours, I think.
As ever, and as repeated ad infinitum on this site, piracy is only a problem if your business model is vulnerable to it. If leveraged or used to market the product (as inadvertently happened above), it can help.
"Stealing is still stealing."
It certainly is. But, copyright infringement is not theft - with the latter you lose the thing "stolen", with infringement you still have it and have lost nothing tangible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]