Microsoft 'Fesses Up, Passed Off Public Art Project As Its Now-Patented 'Virtual Skywriting' Invention

from the is-that-copyright-infringement dept

Wed, Jun 29th 2011 4:09am — Mike Masnick

theodp writes

"Even more curious than the USPTO's decision to award a patent (7,966,024) this week to Microsoft on something it calls 'virtual skywriting,' was the software giant's decision to provide the USPTO with a well-known, unattributed photo of real skywriting in its patent application as a purported example of its virtual skywriting system 'in use.' In response to an inquiry from GeekWire, Microsoft had this to say: 'The use of the skywriting image in the patent was an error and Microsoft will immediately submit the patent for re-issue proceedings to correct the drawings. Microsoft regrets any confusion caused by this error.'"

You can see a comparison image from GeekWire below:

Of course, now I'm wondering if this patent infringes on someone's copyright, which would make for a really interesting legal discussion.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, patents, skywriting, virtual skywriting
Companies: microsoft

8 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Richard (profile), 29 Jun 2011 @ 4:21am

Real skywriting was already patented!
Real skywriting was already patented years ago!

So why didn't this fall at the prior art hurdle.

I could also point out that 25 years ago I worked on a CGI system for periscope simulation. Our cloud sky pattern (accidentally) spelled a word - so I have some prior art too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 29 Jun 2011 @ 4:40am
  
  Re: Real skywriting was already patented!
  "So why didn't this fall at the prior art hurdle."
  
  Because somehow they figured out how to take this program that should be for a touch screen, smart phone and made it work on a 10 year old flip phone.
  
  All joking aside, I just read the abstract and it looks a hell of a lot like the augmented reality program I have for my android called "Layar". You take a picture, it goes out to the web, finds previously made skywriting, and puts it in for you.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Richard (profile), 29 Jun 2011 @ 5:24am
    
    Re: Re: Real skywriting was already patented!
    and of course virtual skywriting has been used in opening or end credits of films/TV many times in the past.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 29 Jun 2011 @ 4:49am

WTF?
You can patent virtual sky writing? How the hell can you patent something in the virtual world that already exists in the real world? It is obvious to anyone skilled in the trade and it has prior art. Of course people will imitate the real world in the virtual world so there should be no patent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spaceboy (profile), 29 Jun 2011 @ 4:52am

Oh man I'm going to patent casting spells in computer games and make a MINT when I sue World of Warcraft!

Easy street here I come!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Darryl, 29 Jun 2011 @ 9:09am

Who really gives a toss ?
No one thats who,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 29 Jun 2011 @ 12:16pm

This is the first article I have read here in a long time that does not default to a fair use discussion. Curious why this is so.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny Man, 29 Jun 2011 @ 1:26pm

Sorry Microlosers, I mean Microsoft
That feature is in the 3 year old I phone app UFO Gold.

On my iPhone now and adds a variety of UFO's to pictures you take and you can ad cloud formations!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]