Leaping The Uncanny Valley: Japanese Pop Star Turns Out To Be A Computer Generated Mashup

from the remix? dept

Thu, Jun 30th 2011 4:05am — Mike Masnick

A few folks sent over versions of this story, about how the popular 61-member (!) Japanese girl music group AKB48 introduced its newest member, named Aimi Eguchi, in a candy commercial, which you can see below: However, after some people started questioning all of this, it was revealed that "Aimi" wasn't a real person at all, but was a computer-generated image, made up of a composite of all of the other girls' "perfect" features. A separate video showed which parts of Aimi came from which other girls in the group. It gets interesting and/or creepy about halfway through, when the video directly highlights which feature from which girl was put into Aimi (though, oddly, the one who supplies the "eyebrows" seems to have her eyebrows covered by her bangs in the video): I'm kind of wondering what the value is here -- other than generating publicity for the bizarreness of it. Since they're already using all the other girls, why create an additional mashup?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: japan, mashup, robots, uncanny valley

41 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Nicedoggy, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:20am

You are talking about Japan a place where some people marry their virtual lovers.

I can see lonely people carrying a pad with a pattern that tells the camera were to place the virtual avatar, so they can take pictures with them or when it is less the 150 gigabytes in size people could pay a buck or two to take a photo with their idols.

Or play games with augmented reality characthers.

But in this case one can see the possibilities, an idol that never dies, never gets angry at fans, never gets old and lives forever, no PR nightmares and maybe most important no one to pay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:31am

Why not?
Soon we will be watching movies without real actors or voices. Not sure I am a fan of that, but it might get to the point where it will be hard to tell onscreen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:24am
  
  Re: Why not?
  soon? what? we've had virtual actors in movies for years man. and guess what, you couldn't tell the difference.
  
  one thing we do still need tho, is voice talent. so far cg voice is terrible. it always sounds like it has no soul.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ShellMG, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:32am

I'm having a "Max Headroom" flashback. The supposedly-CG DJ who talked in fists and bursts turned out to be actor Matt Frewer. I was so disappointed! Now we've got it in reverse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:44am

Who cares why they did it. The point is that they were able to do it, and make use of it. Now leave it to someone else to figure out the best use of it. This will come after numerous false starts and bad ideas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nate (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:44am

Wikipedia and The Guardian report the group as having only 58 members (including the fake one).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 7:10am
  
  Re:
  These big groups grow and shrink constantly. Who knows!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ShellMG, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:48am

Can Halle Barry trademark her nose? Angelina Jolie her lips? Jim Carrey his smile? This could get seriously complicated...and lucrative for lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
darryl, 30 Jun 2011 @ 4:52am

God this is so old i was in fucking diapers when i first heard about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Nicedoggy, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:00am
  
  Re:
  You sure have matured a lot since June 19, 2011 kid you are going places I can see that.
  
  I wish my children had learned to speak as fast as you, not sure about the foul mouth though.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - DS, 30 Jun 2011 @ 8:08am
    
    Re: Re:
    I think you missed a key term, he was in "fucking" diapers. You know, the ones that he wears on the weekend for his "I'm a baby, but I like to fuck" fetish.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:08am
  
  Re:
  WE have tghe technology, we can rebuild him!
  
  ...but why should we? It cost us quadrillions just to make him smile.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:19am
  
  Re:
  Look, none of us is interested in your inability to perform basic bodily functions in the appropriate place on your own. I'm happy that you have recently overcome that problem (you're never to old to learn), but this is really not the place to discuss it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- abc gum, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:35am
  
  Re:
  "God this is so old i was in fucking diapers when i first heard about it."
  
  Apparently that is important to you,
  but for others - it depends.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:52am
  
  Re:
  [quote]God this is so old i was in fucking diapers when i first heard about it.[/quote]
  
  And you are? 15?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Danny, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:30am

Oh great...
Have those folks learn nothing from anime? Based on the Sharon Apple model at some point one of these AI singers is going develop its own free will and cause a lot of problems, and more than likely kill a few people.

For all that is holy please tell me that there isn't some company in Japan working on an unmaned fighter jet...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Liz, 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:13am
  
  Re: Oh great...
  So long as the world is united peacefully by the power of love songs, I'm OK with it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:54am
    
    Re: Re: Oh great...
    It makes killing right, right?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rob, 30 Jun 2011 @ 5:44am

Anyone else...
...Reminded of the 80's movie, Weird Science?

It's alive! ALIVE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jenningsthecat (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:08am

There's no such thing as bad publicity
"Since they're already using all the other girls, why create an additional mashup?"

Because it's gotten them a lot of attention, and because it's memorable. And who knows - this may be the opening move in a CwF gambit! Fans could request custom mashups of their favourite band members, or mashups between fans and band members, or band members and politicians, or band members and Sony executives - the possibilities are endless!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Greg G (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:15am
  
  Re: There's no such thing as bad publicity
  or **AA exec's and the politicians they pay off....
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prisoner 201, 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:33am

Kawaii desu!
I think it's awesome. Today, digital tools are cheap enough that one can create marketable music in one's home (basshunter etc). Tomorrow, you can direct your own movies!

Think of all the stories that, today, will never be told because to do so requires thousands or (more often) millions of dollars.

It will be a wild, diverse explosion just like the digital music scene. End result: more culture for everyone.

Unless the MAFIAA ruin the party for everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A.R.M. (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:54am

An answer to a question.
"Since they're already using all the other girls, why create an additional mashup?"
It's called a figure, and Orchid Seed probably already has a license to this "mash up" so they can throw "her" into panties and sell them for $120 each.

Oh, and the panties will be removable.

This way, none of the girls will be offended when they see the product on shelves across Japan.

AKB48. Legal in Japan. Gets you arrested crossing into Canada.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
charliebrown (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 7:32am

"Since they're already using all the other girls, why create an additional mashup?"

Because they can do it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
E. Zachary Knight (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 8:09am

One thing I haven't see n in regards to this digital personage, is a comparison the the movie "S1mone"

That was a movie about a digital actress who took the world by storm and resulted in the mental breakdown of both her creator and the director who controlled her.

Good movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- DogBreath, 30 Jun 2011 @ 9:24am
  
  Re: movie "S1mone"
  I can say this much. That movie is a small view into the future. I suspect that CGI generated actors will become the ultimate in "Property". The movie companies will love and embrace this idea because with no individual rights for computer generated actors (No actors, no Actors Guild union), the big studios will be able to keep all those up front costs of paying big name actors millions upon millions to be in their films (even on very successful movies that "never make money" according to their accounting practices).
  
  The days of the live actor/actress may be coming to an end, especially once they figure out a computer generated way to get rid of those pesky voice actors.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - taoareyou (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 9:43am
    
    Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
    The companies will still have to pay the puppeteers behind the digital actors. Their expressions, timing, inflections will still have to be programmed. Having a digital actor does not mean you have an AI capable of acting.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - DogBreath, 30 Jun 2011 @ 10:16am
      
      Re: Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
      "The companies will still have to pay the puppeteers behind the digital actors. Their expressions, timing, inflections will still have to be programmed. Having a digital actor does not mean you have an AI capable of acting."
      
      This all may be true (for the present time), but the money paid to a puppeteer will be astronomically less than any big named "Hollywood" actor.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - taoareyou (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 1:00pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
        Really? How do you come to this conclusion?
        
        I am reminded of the movie "Being John Malkovich". The puppets are what people watched, but the puppeteer was the famous one and was the one who got paid, quite well.
        
        If actors are replaced by digital puppets, people will still recognize the skill behind them as it becomes apparent that some digital "actors" perform better than others.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        DogBreath, 30 Jun 2011 @ 8:37pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
        Really? How do you come to this conclusion?
        
        Being skilled as a digital puppeteer doesn't mean your going to get Johnny Depp's or Angelina Jolie's paycheck. It will never happen and the movie studios will see to that. If you don't agree on their price to be a digital puppet in their movie, they'll just get someone else. After all, by then they won't be needing your name or your face to bring money into the box office.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        taoareyou (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 8:46pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
        Sure they can hire some no name, no skill puppeteer, just like a director can hire some no name actor. But what digital puppets will people flock to see? The one with the famous puppeteer. And the famous puppeteer will cost more than the ones with less skill.
        
        It doesn't matter what you put in front of the screen. There will be some human element behind it some of those will be more skilled than others and become more known.
        
        Digital actors are just extensions of the humans that control them. People will be fans of the puppeteers, not the puppets.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Nicedoggy, 30 Jun 2011 @ 8:02pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: movie "S1mone"
      For now, but most probably they will start building a database of expressions that can be reused.
      
      Also the people behind it can be easily changed.
      
      On the bright side any actor that reaches fame can today be forever young on the big screen, how much celebrity artists will pay for having a digital version of theirs that they can put on screen?
      
      Tron was the first film I saw CGI for this but it was not that good you could tell something was not right, but japanese one, oh that one is almost perfect it fooled a lot of people.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- techflaws.org (profile), 1 Jul 2011 @ 12:29am
  
  Re:
  Ever read about Gibson's Idoru?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any Mouse (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 9:50am

Well, this sort of thing, if it could be done without all the hours of imaging, could be used to hide one's identity in all sorts of video offerings. Read that as 'security,' if you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gill Bates, 30 Jun 2011 @ 9:52am

Who are you going to believe..
me or that lying video?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
harbingerofdoom (profile), 30 Jun 2011 @ 10:37am

its japan... if you are asking why, you are approaching the subject from the wrong angle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 30 Jun 2011 @ 11:15am

Research has shown that the critical characteristics of beauty are "average" features. Not average as in your plain everyday girl, but average as in a statistical average of features, in other words a kind of mashup. What they are doing here is not quite that as each feature is not a morphed average but they did choose each "perfect" from one of the existing girls. So, they are approaching the goal of morphed average perfection in beauty. Isn't the mashup creation the prettiest of the girls?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Ed C., 30 Jun 2011 @ 6:15pm
  
  Re:
  Not really, at least not by my standards. There's a number of girls that I thought were cuter or hotter than the virtual one.
  
  I'd have to admit though that she was really good. I'm usually good at spotting digital fakery, but I couldn't tell right off which one she was from the short time each was on the screen in the first video. It's not until I get a better look in the second video that I could spot the "glitch", her eyelids hardly animated at all. They just blinked a few times. That's quite odd, considering that I find that Japanese animators are usually better at animating eyes than most!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jose_X, 1 Jul 2011 @ 11:25am

Extra!
Man Discovers Loyal Friend on Internet is not Dog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Androgynous Cowherd, 3 Jul 2011 @ 2:17pm

Since they're already using all the other girls, why create an additional mashup?

It's Japan, home of all those "by our powers combined!" hero groups whose big powered armor suits can join into a really humongous powered armor menace to fight the worst bad guys. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
benecere (profile), 9 Sep 2011 @ 2:44am

Video is no longer available
Due to numerous copyright notifications. I suppose there's nothing I can say that everyone isn't already thinking, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]