DailyDirt: Growing Superfoods
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Humans have been modifying the genes of plant and animal life for hundreds of years -- using conventional breeding techniques. Maybe you don't like the food you eat to have had its genetic material bombarded by radiation to accelerate mutations, or you don't want genes from pigs in your orange juice. But how else are farmers going to keep growing crops at ever increasing yields... or to grow superfoods that are more nutritious or make us smarter, immune to disease and better looking? Here are just a few examples of biotechnology getting into our food supply.- No naturally occurring citrus plant appears to be immune from the dreaded "citrus greening" disease which threatens the global supply of oranges. The best solution could be a transgenic plant with DNA from other vegetables or a virus or a pig or an artificially-designed gene. (Or the world could just live without oranges for a while....) [url]
- The FDA is evaluating the impact of AquAdvantage Salmon -- a genetically engineered variety of Atlantic salmon that matures much faster than its naturally-occurring cousins. AquaBounty Technologies created this salmon with genes from the Chinook salmon and the ocean pout so that AquAdvantage Salmon produces a growth hormone all year long (instead of just during warm weather) and can be harvested in 18 months (about half the time it takes for conventional salmon). [url]
- A few Chinese officials were fired for violating laws and ethical regulations in order to allow researchers to feed genetically modified rice to about two dozen kids in a study lasting three weeks. The parents were only told that their children would be fed Golden Rice that contained β-carotene, but not that the rice was genetically modified in any way. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aquadvantage salmon, beta-carotene, biotechnology, conventional breeding, dna, farming, food, genetic engineering, gmo, golden rice, hormone, oranges, rice, salmon, superfood
Companies: aquabounty technologies
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
aquabounty salmon...
maybe there should be labeling for how much residual hormones are left in the fish?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
superfoods
But GMO creators (notably Monsanto) have taken it much further. They have added genes so that you can, for example, spray the herbicide Round-Up (also manufactured by Monsanto) directly on crops. In the past, this was never done since it would kill the crops, not just weeds. I the past, you sprayed a field first, wanted for the weeds to die, and then planted. The result is that we get a much bigger dose of Round-Up in our food - the herbicide finds its way into every cell of the plant. And there is no doubt that this herbicide is poisonous to humans. Monsanto simply claims this is not a problem, and then doubles down by suing (successfully) farmers who refuse to use their GMO seeds.
Then there is the case of modifying the genes of a crop so that it produces its own "pesticide." True, it's not a chemical pesticide, it's just a natural toxin. The effect on human health is similar to making a salad with non-edible plants. A company called Aventis Crop Sciences produced a GMO corn called StarLink, intended for use as animal feed but not for human consumption. Nevertheless, StarLink corn found its way into human food, causing a financially disastrous recall or food by Taco Bell:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco_Bell_GMO_recall
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: aquabounty salmon...
anyone who trust labels you is and idiot, if anyone trust anybody in fact they are idiots, one can trust their mother but always check.
Trusting a label is like trusting the internet, it can be useful, but without a confirmation of some kind it can also be very risky.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Take bamboo for example, it has almost no diseases that affects it, it grows anywhere and you can make, structural composites, paper, natural fibers for clothes, artificial fiber, plastic and many other uses in crafts.
As for oranges that is bad I was thinking in trying out the pectin on the orange peels that you can extract by boiling it and using some form of alcohol(e.g. methanol, ethanol, isopropyl, butane, etc) to precipitate it from the solution as a gel pad for low cost EEG pad electrodes using crushed eggshells(calcium carbonate) or (sodium bicarbonate) as the "salt".
Pectin
As for the fish, well I rather eat artificial meat grow in a lab than that.
But there are people that believe that populational pressures will make as look into other options like insects for proteins.
http://www.urdesign.it/index.php/2013/07/30/farm-432-breeding-insects-to-eat-at-home
http://nominateforindexaward.dk/Presentation/read/id=MTc0NA==
http://www.theguardian.com/environ ment/2010/aug/01/insects-food-emissions
Anybody wants termite bread?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Better give up sweet corn.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: superfoods
As to roundup being poisonous... Not very. And there are checks so no high levels are on the sold produce. Possibly this is not the best application for GMO. It is no worse than other stuff they spray plants with thought; Much better actually.
BT-toxin is not poisonous in any way. To us it is a protein and we digest it as any other. On certain very specific insects it binds to receptors in the stomach and they die. We have no such receptors. It is not at all as eating non edible plants! Why should it? Only difference is that the plant contains negligible higher protein content... Plants themselves have much stranger protein then this. Only reason plants themselves have not gone this path is that it is simply not effective on an evolutionary scale. It is simply not an effective way of killing insects. If it weren't for planting practices resistance would evolve almost immediately.
[ link to this | view in thread ]