DailyDirt: Better (Bigger) Batteries
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Battery technology is getting better all the time, but unfortunately not quite at the same pace as Moore's law. While some folks lament the bottleneck of pocket-sized batteries that limit the operation of a phone or laptop to just a few hours (or a couple days on standby), some bigger batteries out there are limiting the growth of renewable energy use. Here are just a few battery projects that could solve some larger scale energy problems.- One of the world's largest lithium manganese batteries will be tested in the UK. This 6 megawatt battery installation should be ready to produce electricity in 2016, and it'll help make renewable energy more compatible with conventional electricity infrastructure. [url]
- IBM has been working on lithium-air batteries for its Battery 500 project that aims to make an electric car battery capable of driving 500 miles. However, the researchers predict that we won't see a commercial battery based on this technology until after 2020. [url]
- Grid scale batteries are already in use, but newer battery technologies could make it much more economical to use renewable energy sources in existing power stations. Still, it will be a few more years before these new battery designs prove their safety and reliability. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: battery, battery 500 project, electrical grid, energy, energy storage, infrastructure, renewable energy
Companies: ibm
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"Produce" feels wrong in this case. It is just a way to smooth out the grid and reduce peaking generators, things like that, right? The facility is energy storage and supply, so, supply?
Other than that, why are all the really cool things supposed to be seven to ten years away forever? It's probably just perception.. I want the future now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The benefit of batteries is they can stop off peak power and use it for peak, the first post if correct batteries do not produce power, they store it.
Batteries are also DC, Direct Current, the grid is AC (alternating current) for the batter to be grid connected you require an inverter. Batteries are 'lossy' they take more energy to charge than they can deliver when discharging, plus the inverter has losses as well.
Also being low voltage and high current you need very heavy cables to transfer power and you cannot transmit it long distances.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The use is correct. By definition, batteries produce electricity through chemical reactions. This is as opposed to things like supercaps, which don't produce electricity themselves but simply store it for later use.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Most renewable sources are indeed irregular and unpredictable. Solar PV is an obvious one. It only works during the day, with most power only during the few hours around noon. And there are both short-term and long term interruptions: a passing cloud can cause a sudden 90% drop in power production, and a storm system can effectively shut off power from the system for a week.
But with current usage levels and patterns that irregularity isn't a crisis. Solar PV and wind power are contribute such a small percentage of the electric power generation that even increasing them by an order of magnitude won't, by themselves, require batteries on the grid.
Batteries on the grid would actually be much more useful to run large power plants more efficiently. It takes hours to ramp up the power output of a large coal fired plant, largely because of the thermal stresses of increasing the temperature of the boilers. Nuclear plants are even slower. The fission reaction is a long cascade of different processes, with many intermediate unstable atoms. Turning up the plant is like throwing a giant log on the fire. The reactor will continue producing lots of power for days, and a major amount of power for the following weeks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
A power station burns coal and 'produces' electricity, a battery takes electricity and gives out (most) of the electricity you put in it.
If a power station acted like a battery, it would use coal to produce coal, or store the energy in the same form as it was received.
A power station takes coal and produces (it's product) electricity.
A battery takes that product (electricity) and stores it in that for (electricity) it has no product of it's own, you fill it up with a product and later you can take that product out of it (plus losses).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Chemical reactions created by the application of that same electricity (ie, you charge the battery).
Supercaps store their electrical energy from electrostatic fields, inductors store their electrical energy from electromagnetic fields.
But if you can only do a '2 terminal' analysis of a batter, or a bank of super caps then you would not be able to determine any real difference, you would find from your analysis that you are able to apply electrical power to the 2 terminals, and see that you able to retrieve that same energy back out.
Now do the same 2 terminal analysis on the output of a coal fired power station, would your analysis be different.
Again, unless you put electricity in a battery it is not going to produce any electricity OUT of the battery, a battery is an electricity store, not a producer of electricity.
or, before you can get electricity out of a battery, you need to produce it and put it in the battery, then that battery can store that electricity and supply it at another time.
But the battery itself cannot produce that electricity, you need something like a generator, to generate electricity and produce it for the battery.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Try using a piece of coal to run your computer !!! fuel is fuel, energy is energy.. I don't expect you to understand... you know.. SIMPLE WORDS !!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]