Needed: Bright Line Rule On Mass Infringement Lawsuits To Stop Copyright Troll Forum Shopping

from the improper-joinder dept

Wed, Sep 7th 2011 1:24am — Mike Masnick

The news that US Copyright Group has dropped yet another of its lawsuits isn't all that noteworthy at this point. This time, it was a lawsuit against people associated with 1,951 IP addresses, which USCG suggests were involved in unauthorized file sharing of the movie I Spit On Your Grave. This comes soon after USCG dropped their giant lawsuit concerning 23,238 John Does accused of sharing unauthorized copies of the movie The Expendables. What's interesting is the likely reason why: the two cases were given to the same judge.

As with the Expendables case, USCG doesn�t give a reason why they chose to voluntarily dismiss the case. However, since this case was also appointed to Judge Robert Wilkins it doesn�t seem far-fetched that they anticipated running into similar jurisdiction issues as they did in the Expendables case.

This follows a similar situation with another copyright troll, John Steele, who tried the same thing, after another case of his got assigned to a judge who scolded him for going on a "fishing expedition." Steele has since resorted to filing similar lawsuits in other jurisdictions.

The courts have had a few mixed rulings on this, with many, but certainly not all, rejecting the joining of thousands (or tens of thousands) of defendants for sharing the same content as being improper. However, a few judges have allowed the cases to "go forward," even though all the copyright trolls want is for subpoenas to go out so they can figure out who to send their "settlement" letters to.

There's a name for this filing and dropping of cases, with new filings in different districts: it's called forum shopping. And it's a sign of a problem.

With so many lawyers jumping into the copyright trolling game lately, using the same basic blueprint (if only they'd sue each other for infringement!), it would be nice if we could get a higher court to issue a bright line rule that said such a joining of totally unrelated parties is totally improper. That could cut off this whole shakedown game quickly. But until we get that, these copyright trolling operations will just continue forum shopping, hoping to find a judge who isn't hip to how they're just using the judicial system as a way to force people into paying money.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, i spit on your grave, jurisdiction, jurisdiction shopping
Companies: us copyright group

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Richard (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 2:11am

Problem with the US system
Although the devolved US court system does have some advantages the possiblity of forum shopping does seem to be a weakness.

In the UK ACS law have been knocked on the head by the courts and it is game over - they have nowhere else to go and have had to give up. It seems a pity that this process will take longer in the US.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 2:28am

Americans are in good hands, they will all be raped by the legal system.

LOL TRDMC!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 2:43am

The trollls will say
Of course the trolls will say "How are they supposed to proceed - they've got to be able to 'defend their rights' somehow" and "surely it can't be extortion to take up on a legal right that you have" or "everything USCG are doing is quite legal- why are you complaining?" or some such.

But of course the point is that, although each of the individual cases is quite legal and proper, that does not mean that the sum total of their actions is legal and proper. It is rather like stalking. A stalker will tell you that they have a perfect right to stand outside their victim's house and always be on the same bus in the morning and so on - but, although the individual actions are quite legal - the sum total of them is an abuse.

In USCG 's case it is an abuse of the law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 3:09am

Re: The trollls will say
Legal maybe, proper? far from it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 3:34am

Pirates are like the BAE - Adaptiv invisible cloak technology, invisible to law enforcement :)

The unfortunate thing is that others are not and they probably be the ones that get blamed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 3:39am

Re: Re: The trollls will say
Maybe not even legal - my point is that a large number of legal actions can sum to an illegal one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 3:54am

Take a leaf out of the MPAA's book
And get Robert Wilkins's judgements published as widely as possible!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 4:48am

Re: Take a leaf out of the MPAA's book
Also include Judge Bernard Zimmerman�s On The Cheap, LLC vs Does 1-5011, that is a must read for everyone longing for a laugh at the expense of copyright trolls.

http://torrentfreak.com/judge-decimates-bittorrent-lawsuit-with-common-sense-ruling-11090 7/

I can't help but laugh right now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NullOp, 7 Sep 2011 @ 5:40am

Infringement
This country needs to pass legislation stating any business based solely on the practice of suing companies on supposed copyright infringement is, in fact, attempting to act as a law enforcement agency and, therefore, shall be deemed an illegal entity. Wouldn't that be something to be able to disarm the trolls!

OMG - Obama Must Go!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 5:49am

Forum shopping? More like Judge shopping, trying to stay away from a Judge who has made an unfavorable ruling. They don't want to keep hitting the same roadblock, as it could become a "standard" by which other cases are measured. It would be better to try in another jurisdiction, find one that doesn't have the same issues, thus discrediting the first ruling.

In a system with multiple districts, there is always somewhere else to work from.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Richard (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 6:34am

Re: Infringement
his country needs to pass legislation stating any business based solely on the practice of suing companies on supposed copyright or patent infringement ....

FTFY
[ link to this | view in thread ]
S.J.Doe (profile), 7 Sep 2011 @ 7:07am

The latest judge Zimmerman's ruling gives us some hope. http://fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2011/09/07/judges-start-to-understand-the-wrongs-of-copyright-trolli ng-model/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 7 Sep 2011 @ 9:09am

ABOLISH IP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 8 Sep 2011 @ 3:05pm

Come on Johnny Steele, we need your commentary on this. Hiding somewhere?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Help me, 21 Sep 2011 @ 8:00am

I just received a settlement letter
I just got one of these uscg settlement letters in the mail telling me to pay $2900 for an illegal download of "Familiar Strangers" movie. I have never downloaded or even heard of this movie. The letter has my name, address and ip address. What should I do? Should I just ignore it? Thank you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jameson, 22 Sep 2011 @ 12:11pm

Re: I just received a settlement letter
I'm also being sued by one of these dirtbags. After reading anything and everything available to me about this and similar lawsuits, I decided to just hold tight and say fuck you. I'm not certain, because I don't speak legalese, but I believe it was just dismissed, Hard Drive Productions v. Does 1 - 1000, CC# 1:10-cv-05606. From what I have taken from all this horseshit, is that these lawyers basically use the legal system for extortion. They file the lawsuits, knowing they will most likely be dismissed, in an effort to get the personal info behind your IP to threaten and scare you into paying them a ridiculous settlement. Do as you see fit for yourself, but I decided to say fuck you. Prove it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Help me, 23 Sep 2011 @ 8:10am

Re: Re: I just received a settlement letter
Right on. I guess the best thing to do is to not make contact with these assholes. You're right....fuck them! If they want to take me to court let them. I dont think they have proof anyway because I never got that shitty movie. Btw was your letter recently? I got mine on the 19th of Sept.
[ link to this | view in thread ]