BBC Thinks Only It Can Have TV Shows About People Dancing; Sues Berlusconi For 'Porn' Version

from the can't-own-ideas dept

When I heard that the BBC was suing Silvio Berlusconi's Mediaset, just knowing the two players involved, I expected to side with the BBC. But on this one I'm left scratching my head over the BBC's ridiculous claim. Apparently, the BBC thinks that it owns the idea of a reality TV show about dancing, a la "Dancing With The Stars" here in the US. In the UK, the BBC apparently runs a similar show called Strictly Come Dancing. Mediaset has apparently launched a new show, Baila! Everyone seems to admit that MediaSet didn't even copy Strictly Come Dancing. Instead, Mediaset points out that it actually adapted a South American dance show "Bailando Por Un Sueno (Dancing For A Dream)," which is different... in that it includes "scantily-clad dancers," and has even included "a model [who] danced topless and simulated sex."

Silvio Berlusconi's son, Pier Silvio Berluscoi, apparently responded by saying that it's "Ok to copy ideas" in television, and he's right. Copyright applies to expression, not ideas. And, even in this case, the ideas appear to be different -- in some ways very different. So, I don't get it. Does the BBC really think that it can own the idea of people dancing on a television show? It seems clear that some of this is to protect the BBC's relationship with a competing Italian TV network, which did license the BBC's show -- but still this seems like a gross overreach by the BBC.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: dancing with the stars, italy, silvio berlusconi, uk
Companies: bbc, mediaset


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    The eejit (profile), 22 Sep 2011 @ 2:20pm

    This just highlights the hypocrisy within Berlusconi: on the one hand, Berlusconi believes that he should own all rights to any media he produces. On the other, himself and his family (who have profited from locking up entertainment) have freely copied another format-show.

    I disagree with the BBC on this lawsuit, but then it's:

    1) publically funded (via the TV license); and
    2) a really dumbass move on the Beeb's part.

    I think the major problem is that the Strictly Come Dancing format is already licensed in Italy, so making a softcore version, while different, may breach the licenses already involved.

    The major issue I have with the Beeb's suit here is that the basis for new culture is, in fact, softcore versions of old culture.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2011 @ 3:22pm

      Re:

      This just highlights the hypocrisy within copyright supporters: on the one hand, they believe that they should own all rights to any media they produce. On the other, them and their families (who have profited from locking up entertainment) have freely copied anything they can get their grubby paws on.



      fixed

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Grae (profile), 22 Sep 2011 @ 4:37pm

    And guess how popular this show is going to get now that a lot more people are hearing about it? I'm betting the male audience for this format will likely rise.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Palmyra (profile), 22 Sep 2011 @ 7:15pm

    Sitting here Sitting here scratching MY head - So Dick Clark's American Bandstand back in the '50s to the late 80s would also be in violation of the BBC's copyright? And what about that Champagne guy that my grandmother watched?

    "I'd give it a 93 Dick, you can really dance to it." :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      The eejit (profile), 22 Sep 2011 @ 11:06pm

      Re:

      Again, the problem isn't that it's been done before; it's that there's already a license in place for Strictly to be shown in Italy. IO still think it's a pretty dumb move on Auntie's part, but if I squint, I can see their logic.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      frosty840, 23 Sep 2011 @ 7:16am

      Re:

      To be fair, Dick Clark's American Bandstand (1952) was predated by the original Come Dancing (1949) TV show by three years.

      But yeah, TV show concept licensing looks like a very silly thing to me...

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Palmyra (profile), 22 Sep 2011 @ 7:16pm

    It would be nice if we could edit our post!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2011 @ 11:05pm

    False Assertion of Copyright

    What happened to the idea vs expression dichotomy? Only the expression can be copyrighted. If ideas were allowed to be copyrighted then practically every TV show ever created would get sued by somebody. Show about dancing? The estate of Fred Astaire would like a word. Isn't this a false assertion of copyright by the Beeb?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    mike allen (profile), 23 Sep 2011 @ 12:31am

    BBC wrong on this though I can see where they come from. but then they also think they should be the only people allowed to broadcast (still)in the UK.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ben (profile), 23 Sep 2011 @ 4:38am

    Good use of money

    Since the BBC is funded by the public, I fail to see why they are pursuing this

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Scooters (profile), 23 Sep 2011 @ 6:51am

    Streisand Effect has an adverse outcome.

    The US version of these dancing shows suck.

    That is all.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    aikiwolfie (profile), 24 Sep 2011 @ 5:02pm

    Format Rights?

    I think this will come down to the format rights for the shows. If the Italian show infringes on the BBC's format rights then the BBC could have a case. As dumb as that sounds. I think the BBC are being really stupid here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.