Publishers Realizing There's Revenue In Selling Ebooks Of Old Content... Even If It's Available For Free
from the you-can-compete-with-free dept
We've been explaining for years that you absolutely can compete with free, and in the last few months a bunch of news publications have figured out an interesting strategy that's working surprisingly well: taking old content from their magazines/newspapers/blogs/etc. and repackaging them as cheap ebooks. And, even though much of that content is available already for free, the convenient package combined with the low price (and the rapid spread of tablets and ebook readers) seems to just hit the sweet spot that makes people willing to pay. We'd actually been planning to do something similar ourselves with some of our past content, just as an experiment, and still plan to do so soon, but it's great to see how well it seems to be working for a variety of publications. It's not a paywall since all the content is available for free, but it is about giving people a reason to buy.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, ebooks, journalism
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
A certain irony...
Then below the article are links to more stories... stuck behind the GigaOm paywall.
Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.
Maybe they should take their own advice?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
People will pay for...
Context,
Intelligent linking, IE: Connections they would have otherwise missed
Filtering,
Good, useful aggregating.
At least I will. Even if the source material is as free as crtl-c/ctrl-v those features, even if only fairly well implemented are enough to get me to pay money for what I could get for free.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All I need to do now is find a very easy way of doing something that people don't normally like or can be bothered to do and sell it to them at a (not so)reasonable price...
If only there was a 'thinking machine' available to help me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kevin Kelly Generatives
I keep going back to that article for business model ideas (along with Mike's general theory on the economics of free post). It really sums it up very well, if you've read Mike and Kevin Kelly, none of these things look surprising at all, it just makes sense.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: People will pay for...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And the seller would experience some level of difficulty retrieving it after being told they lacked the rights to sell it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
psssst ... self cleaning toilet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All I've ever seen from my local paper is expensive, hardcover vanity books with articles by a single writer that just strokes their ego.
Our paper's much more interested in locking all it's content away in archives hoping you'll pay $2 just to read one article.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
See http://www.baen.com/library/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]