EU Politicians Send Letter To US Congress Warning Of 'Extraterritorial Effects' Of SOPA And PIPA
from the trouble-ahead dept
Since SOPA and PIPA are US bills, the focus has naturally been on the US response to them – notably in the list of major sites that participated in the blackout, or who have otherwise protested against the proposed legislation. But it's important to remember that the whole rationale of these new laws is tackling copyright infringement outside the US.
A letter to the US Congress, written by a group of European Parliamentarians worried about the "extraterritorial effects" of SOPA and PIPA, offers a different perspective on the bills. For example, it leads with a reference to the EU-US Summit, held in Washington on 28 November 2011 - probably something ignored by most people at the time and since. Here's what the letter says:
The European Parliament, in its joint motion for a resolution on the EU-US Summit of 28 November 2011, objects the proposed legislation by stating:
The joint statement (pdf) of that Summit had the following section about the Internet:
"Stresses the need to protect the integrity of the global internet and freedom of communication by refraining from unilateral measures to revoke IP addresses or domain names;"We share a commitment to a single, global Internet, and will resist unilateral efforts to weaken the security, reliability, or independence of its operations — recognizing that respect for fundamental freedoms online, and joint efforts to strengthen security, are
mutually reinforcing.
SOPA and PIPA threaten to cut right across that commitment.
Most of the letter goes over the by-now fairly well-known deficits of the bills, but also points out a particular issue for Europe:
Companies wishing to offer online services will be forced to monitor all communication on their platforms and filter anything which could possibly be an infringement of IPR. The methods of monitoring would almost certainly challenge people's fundamental rights. Considering the world wide character of the internet, European companies will be forced to adhere to US standards to prevent DNS blocking. Article 15 of the European E-Commerce Directive prohibits obligations for the general monitoring of their services. The European Court of Justice has recently ruled in the Scarlet/SABAM case that monitoring and filtering of communication online is a breach of fundamental rights such as privacy, freedom of communication and freedom of information and should not be applied to halt infringements of IPR.
It's not clear how that clash between jurisdictions would be resolved: if online services in Europe monitor all communications, they will be breaching European law; if they don't, they may run foul of SOPA/PIPA. Inevitable legal incompatibilities between the two jurisdictions are also hinted at at the close of the letter:
Concluding, SOPA and PROTECT IP will create tensions across the Atlantic in a time where we need to work more closely together. We ask you to vote against SOPA and PROTECT IP and to work with us on effective laws, which enable a fair remuneration of artists and creators online, without violating fundamental rights or fragmenting the free and open internet as we know it. We also believe in close cooperation in promoting internet freedom world wide, in line with our foreign policy objectives.
It's true that the number of politicians signing the letter is small, so its impact is likely to be correspondingly weak, but it seems that Europe's top politicians are also starting to wake up to SOPA and PIPA, as this report on EurActiv indicates:
Ryan Heath, spokesperson for the EU's digital agenda commissioner Neelie Kroes, told EurActiv that the EU executive was closely monitoring the developments in the US.
Good luck with that.
"Today's protest clearly shows that digital issues are now mainstream political issues," Heath said.
"While we acknowledge the importance of combating illegal content online, the means to achieve this objective must be effective, proportionate and preserve the advantages of an open Internet. We expect the extra-territorial impacts of any US legislation would be minimised."
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eu, jurisdiction, pipa, protect ip, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/news/1480343/kodeks_povedeniya_v_seti
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Solution: Block all communications with the US. No privacy violations, no SOPA violations. If they complain, tell them you did it to comply with US law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Freetards
Definitely written by freetards. Cant be trusted. /s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Freetards
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Freetards
Un freaking believable. Who did the US send this to? Wait...what... they sent it to us? (face-palm)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Amazed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Amazed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lemmings Anonymous
Next, will appearing in a 301 report be seen as a badge of honor and indicate a willingness to stand up to pressure from the US media lobby?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Freetards
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Amazed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8
The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.
Hint: can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No clash
Since they're not under US jurisdiction, SOPA would not be binding upon them, and there would be no conflict for European companies. Their US-based ad networks and payment processors, on the other hand, would be forced to abide by SOPA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I thought the purpose was to prevent Americans access to sites outside the US that may have infringing content/links to?
The GAFF
Great American Firewall of Freedom!
[ link to this | view in thread ]