Yahoo Going Patent Troll: Threatens Facebook Over Patent Infringement

Organic Farmers' Preemptive Lawsuit Against Monsanto Patents Tossed Out For Being A Bit Too Preemptive

from the can't-declare-just-yet dept

Tue, Feb 28th 2012 3:48pm — Mike Masnick

Monsanto has quite a track record of going after farmers for making use of its "patented" seeds, even in a case that involve seeds that blew onto a farm from a neighboring farm. So, it wasn't entirely surprising to see a group of organic farmers preemptively sue Monsanto last year, asking for a declaratory judgment that they did not infringe. However, the judge in the case has now dismissed the case, noting that for a declaratory judgment, there has to be a real conflict, and Monsanto keeps insisting that it won't sue these farmers. From a legal standpoint, this argument makes sense (and the declaratory judgment standard can be pretty high in some cases -- especially if no direct threat has been issued). But, it still seems unfortunate. Given Monsanto's past actions in other cases, even if it says it won't sue now, plenty of farmers are reasonably scared about what will happen down the road. But, for now, they just have to wait and hope that Monsanto seeds don't show up on their farms...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: declaratory judgment, organic farmers, patents, seeds
Companies: monsanto

48 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 3:53pm

Stupid plebians
Did they really think they could win against a corporation? They have a building full of lawyers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- silverscarcat (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:25pm
  
  Let me fix your quote...
  "Did they really think they could win against a corporation? They have a barn full of lawyers."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 6:51pm
  
  Re: Stupid plebians
  And a backup building of lawyers just in case
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:17pm

Calling Ms. Morissette
Is claiming copyright on self-replicating organisms ironic?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btr1701 (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:19pm
  
  Re: Calling Ms. Morissette
  > Is claiming copyright on self-replicating
  > organisms ironic?
  
  Perhaps, but Monsanto isn't doing that. It's claiming patent.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chargone (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:07am
    
    Re: Re: Calling Ms. Morissette
    the 'self replicating' bit should still be shooting them in the face.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
btr1701 (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:18pm

Seeds
Never could figure out why the courts let companies get away with this sort of thing. If they purposely introduce something into the environment, that by its very nature is designed to germinate and spread as far and wide as possible, it's ridiculous to allow them to then turn around and sue everyone within spore-range of their facility because of their own actions.

And since the claims are being allowed to go forward, I'm not sure why the farmers don't countersue Monsanto for trespass and/or negligently contaminating their farms with their unwanted genetically modified freak-seeds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Greevar (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 6:23pm
  
  Re: Seeds
  They try, but the courts weigh heavily in their favor. So much so, that Monsanto can purposely deposit seeds in a farmer's crops just so they can ruin a competitor with rival seeds.
  
  Check out "The Future of Food". It makes it all very clear.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - btr1701 (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 12:02pm
    
    Re: Re: Seeds
    > They try, but the courts weigh heavily in their favor.
    
    Based on what legal theory? Because unless the judge just wants to openly admit that "big companies always win", there's no actual statutory or common law principle that would allow Monstanto to prevail.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
GMacGuffin (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:27pm

This was actually a success ... of sorts
I think the organic farmers got what they could out of this - repeated representations by the other Evil Empire that they won't sue organic farmers is not in a federal court record.

The Court had little choice on how to rule ... ripeness and all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- GMacGuffin (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:27pm
  
  Re: This was actually a success ... of sorts
  ...er, is "now" in a federal court record.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 4:48pm

Today we patent plant seeds. Next step: humans. Well, maybe not, but I could be laughing my old ass off in 30 years saying "I told ya so!" when Cumsanto starts suing women who got impregnated by men with patented genes. "I'm sorry, ma'am, but that baby has our intellectual property in it. We're entitled to it!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Benjamin C. Wade, 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:28pm
  
  Re:
  Judge Solomon already decided this case. They cut the child down the middle. Each gets half. After all, half the genes were hers.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Liz (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:39pm
    
    Re: Re:
    IIRC in that case, the mother decided to give up her baby instead of seeing it cut in half. So the judge awarded full custody to the company and fined the former mother to pay for the company's legal fees.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
mr. sim (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:30pm

I'm not sure why the farmers don't sue Monsanto for trespass, breaking and entering, loss of livelihood and negligently contaminating their farms with their unwanted genetically modified seeds. monsanto has failed in a legal obligation to prevent their genetically altered seed from ruining the farmers organic non genetically engineered crops.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:32pm

Why isn't Monsanto not Liable for Contaminating Crops
Why are organic farmers on the defensive here? Why isn't Monsanto liable for contaminating natural crops? Surely it also takes on the risks of GMO impacting a legitimate crop strain?

Or are the organic farmers stuck in a legal catch-22?

The whole things seems backwards to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- saulgoode (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:56pm
  
  Re: Why isn't Monsanto not Liable for Contaminating Crops
  I don't understand why the FBI isn't sending in anti-terrorist squads to arrest Monsanto's CEO. GMOs are illegal in Hungary and the U.S. should not be permitting this rogue corporation to flaunt Hungarian law with such disregard.
  
  How can the FBI expect other countries to enforce U.S. laws if they aren't willing to reciprocate?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 10:06pm
  
  Re: Why isn't Monsanto not Liable for Contaminating Crops
  The answer is simple
  
  Monsanto has money
  
  Organic farmers do not
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dood, 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:57pm

They'll sue they always do
Even though they didn't get the declaratory judgement, they at least have it on file and the comments from Montassholes about not suing. Arrows in the quiver, because we all know they're gonna sue. Just a matter of when.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tony, 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:57pm

Organic industry depends on gm food to be bale to charge more for their food. They are not threatened - the opposite is true. They only exist by slandering companies like Monsanto. Monsanto has done more to reduce chemical insecticides than the whole organic industry. Bt rips have reduced massive levels of insecticide just one example root worm killing nerve poisoning chems have been reduced on 25 million acres every year since 2003 almost 10 years by root worm protected Gm corn. You really need to stop reading the crap on the internet
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Suzanne Lainson (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 6:22pm
  
  Re:
  One problem is these Monsanto "miracles" are already losing effectiveness. We've got pests and weeds that have mutated to dodge what Monsanto produces. So Monsanto not only wants to control crops around the world, it must keep trying to produce new products to stay in the game.
  
  People want the option not to have these plants. And poor farmers particularly don't want to be dependent on a large corporation providing them with expensive products. So they are fighting a system where unwanted crops contaminate their own crops and then they are sued for having them.
  
  Also, another big issue has been labeling. You want to grow GMOs? Fine, but don't balk if countries ask you to label the foods that have them. In fact, if GMOs are so great, presumably you'd be proud to sell labeled GMO foodstuffs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - TheBigH (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:12pm
    
    Re: Re:
    "In fact, if GMOs are so great, presumably you'd be proud to sell labeled GMO foodstuffs."
    
    That's difficult, considering the amount of fearmongering and misinformation spread by the opponents of GMO food.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:28pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      "fearmongering and misinformation"
      
      As opposed to the fearmongering and misinformation spread by producers of GMO food?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - TheBigH (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:44pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Oh, I agree. Some of the GMO producers (eg. Monsanto) aren't doing themselves any favours with their unscrupulous behaviour. But this is part of the problem. If you're justified in attacking a company over its unethical business practices you feel more able to attack it over other things as well- such as the science, where your justification may not be as strong.
        
        Look at the case of "big pharma" for example. People have a go at them for their greed and shameless profiteering, and rightly so. But then some turn around and say that if "big pharma" are willing to do this then obviously all their drugs are going to just make people sick and keep them sick rather than healing them because all they care about is money and not about people. And so you get dangerous idiots like the antivax movement, faith healers, and homeopaths cashing in on people's ill-informed mistrust of the evil scary corporations. I don't really see the fear of GMO food as being any different.
        
        I can dislike a company's practices without being paranoid of the science.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:55pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        That is why people need to start producing their own drugs so they have an understanding of how things are done, there is no better shield against that type of thing than education.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Suzanne Lainson (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 9:06pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I saw this and I am concerned about attacks on science.
        
        Attacks paid for by big business are 'driving science into a dark era' | Science | The Observer
        
        What complicates things in terms of health is that what might be conventional wisdom at one point may be disproved later on. For example, it was considered "modern" for women to bottle feed. Now we know that breastfeeding is better, and yet for years we had to battle formula companies not to pressure women, particularly poor women, to favor formula over breast milk.
        
        Back in the 1950s, tonsillitis was sometimes treated with radiation. Now we know that it can result decades later in thyroid cancer.
        
        Once I became pregnant, I became much more aware of what I was exposed to and what my kids were exposed to. Are concerns about GMOs too extreme? I don't know. But I want the option not to have GMO foods. And I worry that we'll have a rebound effect giving us superbugs and superweeds and the system will end up being more out of whack than it was before.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 9:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        The thing I fear from GMO's, is the fact that they are just one more way for massive, bureaucratic, monstrosities called corporations to seek rent money from things even the poor depend on, namely food.
        
        Those that seek seed royalties, and the legal monopoly over ALL of food in the world, aren't your friends. Science, or no science.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Suzanne Lainson (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 9:17pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        The thing I fear from GMO's, is the fact that they are just one more way for massive, bureaucratic, monstrosities called corporations to seek rent money from things even the poor depend on, namely food.
        
        Yes, I feel the same way. I don't want Big Ag to own the world's food supply.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Prisoner 201, 28 Feb 2012 @ 11:29pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Read "The Windup Girl" by Paolo Bacigalupi for a bleak image of a future where "calorie companies" rule a world ruined by their gene designed crop diseases used to oust competitors.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        btr1701 (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 12:07pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        > The thing I fear from GMO's, is the fact
        > that they are just one more way for massive,
        > bureaucratic, monstrosities called corporations
        > to seek rent money from things even the poor
        > depend on, namely food.
        
        Next step: The Hunger Games!
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Suzanne Lainson (profile), 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:34pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      That's difficult, considering the amount of fearmongering and misinformation spread by the opponents of GMO food.
      
      So, even though GMOs are saving mankind, they need to be kept secret because of PR?
      
      I actually didn't pay too much attention to them until recently. I've always tried to avoid pesticides and herbicides, so in general I prefer organic foods. While GMOs might reduce the needs of herbicides and pesticides on crops, if they result in harder-to-kill weeds and bugs, we're back to where we were.
      
      What got me worried about GMOs is that they can spread to non-GMO crops and then the farmers get sued for having them. That sounds like a power play to me.
      
      People do have the right to avoid GMOs and countries do have the right to prevent them from being grown within their borders. If labeling helps consumers identify what they want to buy, it sounds like a good thing to me.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 5:58pm

Easy For Monsanto
Winning against any farmer is easy for Monsanto. If natural transfer of pollen by the wind is not getting the job done, then send an agent to toss in a few handfuls of Monsanto seed into the fields of the proposed victim. Wait until harvest. Agent quietly harvests a bit of the crop. Test the crop. Discover Monsanto patented genes. Sue. Expert witnesses testify that Monsanto genes found. Farmer loses. Chalk up another victory for Monsanto.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btr1701 (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 12:09pm
  
  Re: Easy For Monsanto
  > Agent quietly harvests a bit of the crop.
  > Test the crop.
  
  How do they get that into evidence without admitting to illegal trespass?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 1:02pm
    
    Re: Re: Easy For Monsanto
    Who said they had to trespass?
    
    1. Stand 'upwind' with bag of GMO seed.
    2. Toss seed in air
    3. Let wind do what wind does
    4. Accuse farmer of 'stealing GMO seed' point out that a sample from spot X would be a good test site.
    5. Let farmer provide 'sample' from suggested site.
    6. Sue farmer and Profit....
    
    If you really can't figure out how to screw the consumer, then congratulations, you aren't an evil corporate shill (this would have been a 'no brainer' for them - not referring to their bosses, just the concept of how to legally 'screw' the customer....)
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - btr1701 (profile), 3 Mar 2012 @ 2:28am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Easy For Monsanto
      > Accuse farmer of 'stealing GMO seed' point out that a sample
      > from spot X would be a good test site.
      
      Even if the test results are positive, how does that prove theft on the part of the farmer? All it proves is that the seed somehow got on the farmer's land and given that seeds are intentionally designed to germinate on their own, the mere presence of patented seed on the land proves nothing regarding theft. To prove theft, you'd have to also prove intent to steal on the part of the farmer.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 8:52pm

If I am a farmer and Monsanto says to me to destroy my crop, I do it, the next day I'm suing them for contaminating my fields and asking for damages and punitive fees.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 10:08pm
  
  Re:
  And the day after there is an entire nation of lawyers knocking at your door to charge you with everything from slander to murder (of their crops which you razed).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:27am
    
    Re: Re:
    I put an ad asking if anybody want to sue monsanto for millions and see what it happens.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 10:23am
  
  Re:
  They have bazookas that shoot lawyers. And battering rams made of lawyers. And a giant lawyer composed of guess what, lawyers! Good luck putting a scratch in them
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2012 @ 10:20pm

300k Organic Farmers To Sue Monsanto For Seed Patent Claims

http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/02/15/1956248/300k-organic-farmers-to-sue-monsanto-fo r-seed-patent-claims

Monsanto really does deserve imprisonment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Tom Betz (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 8:29am
  
  This is the same lawsuit.
  Judge Buchanan made her ruling a month early.
  
  http://bit.ly/xdaqfD
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 28 Feb 2012 @ 10:56pm

Wrongful contamination
We have wrongful death lawsuits, why not wrongful contamination lawsuits? live by the sword...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dr. Evil, 29 Feb 2012 @ 4:17am

if a seed sprouts, grows, and replicates
isn't the SEED itself violating the patent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:28am
  
  Re: if a seed sprouts, grows, and replicates
  Not if the seed has permission to sprout :)
  
  Isn't the law wonderful?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Suzanne Lainson (profile), 29 Feb 2012 @ 7:50pm

Article from a couple of weeks ago
Monsanto Guilty! France convicts big ag firm of chemical poisoning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Suzanne Lainson (profile), 10 Mar 2012 @ 11:11am

Here's the latest
Insect Experts Issue 'Urgent' Warning On Using Biotech Seeds : The Salt : NPR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Suzanne Lainson (profile), 11 Mar 2012 @ 10:22am

And more
Why Monsanto Thought Weeds Would Never Defeat Roundup : The Salt : NPR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
missmeghan, 26 Mar 2012 @ 8:12pm

consider all angles
there is currently legislation being considered to mandate the labeling of gm ingredients in our food. if consumers are given the choice, monsanto will face incredible losses. we should all be paying attention to these cases. these sociopathic giants will be brought to justice, and the meek shall... you know the rest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]