EU Parliament Urged To Reject Agreement With The US To Hand Over Passenger Data
from the privacy-matters dept
There's been an ongoing discussion between the US and Europe (and other countries as well) about the US's demands that anyone flying to the US should have all sorts of data passed along to the US first. And while an agreement has been made, apparently the rapporteur in charge of examining this issue of sending passenger data to the US, Sophie in't Veld, is now urging the EU to reject the agreement.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eu, passenger records, pnr, privacy, us
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The second thing that will happen is that the US-based repositories holding it will be hacked, the data will be extracted, and it will be made available for sale in the usual places on the Internet. This means in turn that every stalker, every rapist, every crazed ex-lover with sufficient cash and savvy will be able to purchase it.
The third thing that will happen is they'll use it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If certain people in the EU see it as an issue, then perhaps they may wish to consider the possibility that clearing US Customs will be infinitely more difficult.
This is not to say that privacy concerns are illegitimate, but only that it is a bit weary to keep reading about the big-bad US trying to stick it to the rest of the world by "demands" and "overreaching".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Also, if you really want to hide yourself as anonymously as possible, you'd change your writing style. This air of sophistication you attempt to present at times, when you aren't foaming at the mouth over piracy, kinda gives you away.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
This article purposely characterizes US officials in a negative light, without any consideration that there are perhaps some legitimate reasons for the data.
Before launching in to another "they are at it again" screed, in my view one who wants to strive for accuracy should at the very least try and secure a copy of the document and try and contact US officials to solicit their views.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The concerns are not over the US requesting data. It's how they have access to it, how they store it and how long they have access to it.
If certain people in the EU see it as an issue, then perhaps they may wish to consider the possibility that clearing US Customs will be infinitely more difficult.
Again, the concern is not about sharing the info, but how much and how the info is shared.
This is not to say that privacy concerns are illegitimate, but only that it is a bit weary to keep reading about the big-bad US trying to stick it to the rest of the world by "demands" and "overreaching".
No. They are demands and they are overreaching. For someone who constantly puts us down petulantly for not knowing what we're talking about based on your "expert" knowledge, I'm surprised you'd comment on a subject you appear ignorant about.
The concern here is that the US has continued to ratched up its demands further and further, and now basically wants universal, unlimited access to European passenger roles. As the video makes clear, the EU is fine with sharing reasonable amounts of data with limits on how it is accessed, how long the US has access to it, and how it's stored.
The demands over those things are clearly, overreaching.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It is very much a one way street.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
BTW, it is not my intent to put you down. Most of my comments are intended to clarify or correct statements made that I believe are inaccurate in matters dealing with legal issues.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Bullshit.
If you wanted to correct or clarify you would correct or clarify. You don't do that. You snidely comment about how smart you are while snidely talking down about anyone you dislike. It's pathologically stupid and makes you look like a jackass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Apparently, you seem to believe you are a better judge of my subjective intent than I am. Just because you believe you are right does not mean you are. I say what I say in good faith. It would be nice to have it received as such.
By the way, I constantly attempt to correct or clarify. Not once have I ever made any sort of comment about how "smart" I am and how "dumb" someone else is. Your resort to personal attacks makes we wonder if perhaps your subject matter expertise does not stand on as firm a foundation as you proclaim and would have others believe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, I can read your intent just as well as you can, and your denials of your obvious intent are pretty laughable.
By the way, I constantly attempt to correct or clarify. Not once have I ever made any sort of comment about how "smart" I am and how "dumb" someone else is.
Nearly every post you cast aspersions on the knowledge of someone else without actually "correcting" or "clarifying" anything.
Case in point: http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120218/00481917799/how-patent-system-is-rigged-to -only-expand-whats-patentable.shtml#c187
There is no reason to post what you posted other than to suggest that Mr. Masur is not as well versed in these subjects as you, the brilliant expert.
You make no effort to correct or clarify. You merely suggest that Mr. Masur is clearly unqualified to speak on such issues, while implying that you, of course, have the necessary experience.
It's exceptionally transparent. And the thing is, you do that in nearly every post.
Your denials are pretty funny. Because if you truly believe you are clarifying and correcting and NOT acting like a pedantic asshole, you really need to go back and learn how to write like you're not a pedantic asshole.
And, I know, I know, oh heaven's to betsy, Mike Masnick is using curse words again. You're a big boy. I've told you already that I call it like I see it, and you act like a pedantic asshole who never has the balls to actually make a definitive statement on anything. It's why we call you out, and why we think you're full of shit. Because you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
In the past I have critiqued many such articles, some laudatory and some not. Many I happen to disagree with I most certainly do not "pan" because it is clear that the author is not shooting from the hip. As difficult as it may be for some to understand, it is quite possible for one having a particular view of the law to entertain polar opposite views. They can be provocative and provide very valuable food for thought.
Some years ago I wrote a rather scathing critique of an academic article. The author took umbrage and essentially told my that I was way off base and my view would never hold sway before a court. Funny, but I never heard back from the individual when my view was upheld by a court and a decision rendered that came as a surprise (to say the least) to the vast majority of practitioners who regularly dealt with the issues involved in the case. Does this make me "smart". Absolutely not. All it does is confirm that there is no substitute for closely following substantive law and its historical development. This is but one of many examples where longstanding notions and understanding of legal issues have been proven wrong, with those critical of my views and opinions comprising predominantly academics.
As for using "curse words", all they indicate to me a fundamental weakness in the position(s) being articulated by the user(s). In my view resort to "crass" is an ineffective way to engage is a discussion.
By the way, what is this "we" stuff? Seems to me it should be "I".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and when any other country expects to be able to do the same over US citizens and be able to have access to the US government's computer systems, what will the response be? it will be a very loud 'FUCK OFF'. this is a typical move by the US. they've got to have every bit of information about everybody and be able to track everything about everybody, but will refuse to allow the same of it's people or government. another step towards trying to take over the world!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
WE DO NOT WANT OUR INFORMATION TO BE COMPROMISED BY GOVERNMENT FIAT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In Canada we've already suffered from the over-enthusiam of American authorities who wrongly deported a Canadian citizen to Syria where he was detained and tortured for a number of years while the security apparatus in the States and Canada denied any mistake before admitting one and our citizen came back home. We still have the problem of Canadians appearing on a no fly list on a Canadian airline (Air Canada) apparently based on the US no fly list who can still travel back and forth across the border with relative ease and fly on American carriers once in the United States.
It's not just the permanence of access to data that American authorities want but what the maze of American security agencies will do with it once they have it even as they work at cross purposes, which they often do, and European citizens get to pay the price for it.
Ensuring security from terrorists is vital and something all nations and groups of nations must do. Just not at the cost of eroding the rights of the citizenry because some in the security apparatus just love the idea of tonnes of data they can have fishing expeditions into.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The EU can choose to enforce their rules, but they will find that they are not able to change US law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
ya know, the simple response to this is to stop flying to the US.
if they want to kill their markets, let them BE a dead market and see how that goes for 'em.
would hurt the EU in the short term, long term would hurt less than agreeing to this sort of nonsense, and might eventually result in a shift in US policies... or at least a return to isolationism on their part so they leave the rest of us alone.
or, you know, they start invading (more powerful) places (than before). that could happen too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For every bit of personal data that leaves the EU for the US (as passenger data, as a result of dragnet request by law enforcement, NLSs, letters rogatory, MLAT requests, FISA orders, subpoenas, search warrants, or what have you), an equal amount of personal data from an American must be transferred to the EU, so our law enforcement, governments, secret services, and companies can rummage through your information at will, share it at will, modify it at will, datamine it at will, use it for advertising purposes at will, tax you at will, deny you access to the EU at will.
Seems only fair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Bet if politicians had to share that level of details with a foreign government they wouldn't be nearly as eager pushing for stuff like this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It's the voter who needs to feel the pain, as an incentive to push for better legislation through their representatives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
EU is Doing Right
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at the Obama Administration. It wants peace talks to continue between the Palestinians and Israel but when Israel continues to build on land the Palestinian Authority want to build their state on ... Israel says no and continues to build on that contested land.
So, what does the Obama Administration do? They demand that the Palestinians to come back to the talks yet won't pressure Israel to negotiate in good faith.
I'm an American, I'm a Patriot and I love my country. But I'm ashamed and disappointed that our government no longer works for the people and they are no longer working for peace. Only to further their own goals of instituting laws that are only harming our civilization.
The founding fathers of our country, who created our "Constitution of the United States", and I'm referring to the original "UNALTERED", "UNEDITED" and "UNABRIDGED" version of our constitution, they would be ashamed as to what has happened to our country.
I wish our founding fathers had never rose up against the British rule because we deserve to be destroyed like the disease we've turned into.
I'm sorry for saying this but we've become the very problem that we rebelled against (when we fought against the British Empire). America has become a dictator who no longer respects our neighbors and who continue to dictate to the rest of the world what they should be doing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"The US Customs and Border Protection department charge $14 per application for an ESTA. All payments must be made by credit card." ( source: http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/north-central-america/uni ted-states )
So only people with a credit card can enter the country, but only when you've already paid 14 bucks for the privilege of emptying your soul to US Customs and Border 'Protection' agency.
Next to that you have to endure the ridiculous security theatre, which thankfully you don't have to pay for (yet).
No, the US hates tourists, and would like to see America only open to Americans.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You're going with a $14 fee? There are reasons not to go to the US, but once you've bought intercontinental plane tickets, $14 is quite literally pocket money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BTW, EU has been giving this info to the US since 2003
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's like Obama is a mix between Napolean and Hitler.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Oh, wait - did I respond to sarcasm? In the midst of right wing pandering, it becomes difficult to discern.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So, who would you rather compare with Hitler and Napoleon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You want to fly from Chicago to Germany?
Great! Submit your information to all countries that you pass over for security reasons. This could include many half a dozen countries or more! Canada, Greenland, Iceland, the U.K, the Netherlands, Germany, perhaps France.
If all these countries wanted to keep and retain information about U.S. Citizens traveling to, over or through them, in perpetuity how would the U.S. Government react? Why would they expect any other nation to react differently than they would?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
1 "ask" for whatever it is you want.
2 when not getting it "encourage" said country to get it.
3 if not effective promish to help them with "gifts" and "aid"
4 if that does not work "talk" them into it with threats of "agressive diplomacy" and helping fund "like minded citizens" to "encourage" said government and people to accept there "agressive diplomacy"
5 if all else fails commence "aggressive diplomacy" to bring "freedom" to said country
6 PROFIT!
steps seven and eight will be covered if populace *has different outlook*
i doubt it will get beyond step 2 here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And the "New World Order" marches on
The so called Christian USA has done more to push the world to this point than any other country since 1945.
They will ultimately fail as has every other empire building nation throughout history.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I would hesitate in the least to visit and enjoy the diversity of places and things that my country has to offer. I visited Europe with my family several years ago, even as controversial political issues were being discussed and considered for legislative enactment. Funny thing, they had not a whit if relevance or impact on the great enjoyment we had traveling throughout the contries we visited.
While in Europe we were welcome with open arms, and had a great time trying to deal with the diversity of languages with which we came in contact. Imagine not speaking German, the other person not speaking English, and yet somehow being able to communicate. It was actually quite fun.
As we experienced in Europe, I have no doubt you would have the same experience in a visit to the US.
BTW, if a part of your visit would be to go to a theme park in Orlando, make sure you avoid the period between mid-April and mid-October. The temperature and humidity is more than a bit extreme...it is almost debilitating for those who are not acclimated to extremes of heat and humidity.
Enjoy what we have to offer. I am confident you will find a trip here a very pleasureable experience.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That's a bit different since those controversial issues weren't specifically related to European governments invading your privacy as a condition of allowing you to visit (at least I don't remember any such issues).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No
[ link to this | view in chronology ]