American Airlines Making Life Worse For Most Loyal Customers By Killing Useful Mile-Tracking Browser Plugin
from the lame dept
It's still really amazing to me how often we hear about companies making their own customers' lives worse off in an obsessive need for excess control. The latest such example comes via Rob Hyndman, who points us to the news that American Airlines has forced Award Wallet to stop providing a useful tool for American fliers trying to keep track of their frequent flyer mileage. American had cut off a bunch of web-based services in the past that would log into American's site for you and provide a different view and other useful tools. In that case, the airline argued -- perhaps reasonably -- that it was concerned about security of a third party logging into the site and having access to your account/password. There are ways that American could deal with those security concerns, but at least that argument made some sense. In response, however, Award Wallet built a browser plugin that never involved data going to any third party. Basically everything stayed local. All it did was give users a better way to view the information (and was apparently especially handy for families).And American Airlines didn't like it.
It couldn't use the "security" argument this time, because everything was local. But, actually, it tried to use that same argument anyway, responding to a question from BoardingArea, saying that it shut down Award Wallet to maintain the company's...
...…long-held stance on how third-party websites access proprietary AAdvantage member details… Because travelers’ AAdvantage account numbers and passwords can be used to claim AAdvantage mileage awards out of their accounts and access personal details, American will always protect this information.But that falsely assumes that the browser plugin is a "website." It's possible that American is just confused... but the more likely situation is that American Airlines is still just worried about controlling the customer, rather than making sure they have the best experience for them. What services like Award Wallet do is make American's frequent flyer program more valuable to consumers, but apparently American doesn't want that if it means having less control.
We simply cannot permit websites that have not satisfied our security requirements the access needed to track AAdvantage balances or any other function that is otherwise secured behind AA.com login credentials.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: browser plugin, control, frequent flyer mileage, software, users
Companies: american airlines, award wallet
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's not very secure for American Airline's wallets now is it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There is a difference
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Awards"
People aren't actually supposed to be able to get rewards from these programs.
Plugins like this "Award Wallet" defeat the purpose of having an awards program in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't agree with what they are doing, I'm just saying that it's not true a plugin "never involved data going to any third party".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They have a point ...
And then surreptitiously phone home with that info. Once I've collected lots of info from lots of users, I can decide whose account I want to compromise and steal miles from.
Far fetched? Yes.
Possible? Yes.
This isn't control for control's sake. This is protecting very valuable information. Credit card miles are very useful things, and very valuable. I just used credit card miles to get a $1200 round trip ticket (April can't come quick enough!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If everything stayed local, then yes, it is absolutely true that no data went to a third party.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They are confused.
There is a control aspect of things, too. But it's more AA concerned on perception, than anything else. They concern themselves over every little detail that may "offend" somebody.. It's crazy. AA is a control freak, controlled by "political correctness."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another story
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They have a point ...
Of course, I don't actually know how this particular "plugin" was implemented, so I can only theorize. If anyone has more info about what Award Wallet was, I'd like to hear it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another story
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
welcome to AA employees world..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They have a point ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: They have a point ...
Install Mile Viewing Thingy?
It can access:
-Your data on aa.com
-Your data on totallynotaphisher.com
What makes you think John (or Jane) Q Public would notice or object? I worked in IT long enough to know that most people just click ok on most messages.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: They have a point ...
In this process no AA related data ever goes to AwardWallet.com, there are two ways to verify that: (1) network sniffer (2) look at the source code.
Cheers,
-Alexi
[ link to this | view in thread ]