FBI Turns Back On 2,750 Of The 3,000 GPS Devices It Turned Off For Lack Of A Warrant
from the spy-spy-spy-away dept
In January, we wrote about the Supreme Court's somewhat surprising ruling on GPS monitoring by law enforcement, in which it suggested (but didn't fully say) that putting a GPS device on a car might need a warrant -- a pretty easy process that the FBI just didn't want to go through. Following this, we noted a report saying that the FBI scrambled to turn off 3,000 such devices that had been placed without a warrant.However, in an NPR report about just how unhappy the FBI is about all of this, it notes that the FBI actually scrambled to file for warrants on most of those 3,000 devices, such that only 250 were permanently shut off. And yet it's still complaining about this whole "getting a warrant" thing. As Tim Lee notes, FBI director Robert Mueller is basically complaining to Congress that it's just so hard:
In Congressional testimony last month, FBI Director Robert Meuller said the ruling "will inhibit our ability" to do GPS tracking "in a number of surveillances where it has been tremendously beneficial." Mueller said that in cases where they didn't have probable cause, the FBI is forced to deploy teams of six to eight people to track suspects the old-fashioned way.But, uh, isn't that why we require a warrant? It's supposed to be hard to spy on people. That's kind of one of the key principles of the Constitution. Again, as Lee notes:
"If you require probable cause for every technique, then you are making it very, very hard for law enforcement," an FBI lawyer told NPR.
Of course, that's kind of the point. Law enforcement's job would be a lot easier if we just did away with the Fourth Amendment and gave the police unfettered spying powers. But that would open the door to abuses of power, so the founders wisely limited government searches to cases where the government could demonstrate it had probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed.Separately, the fact that so many of the devices were able to be turned back on via a warrant suggests that this intermediary review step isn't really a problem for the FBI in most cases. But it's one that likely stops significant abuse of the system.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fbi, gps, robert mueller, spying, warrants
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
"Okay..."
"Then we go to the Judge saying that we have, without a reasonable doubt, plenty of evidence to get a warrant."
"Okay."
"THEN we get the warrant and use our illegally obtained evidence as legally obtained evidence and crush the poor bastards!"
"BRILLIANT!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Taps playing quietly in background.
A small part of what I believed this country to be just died... again... and again.
I gotta stop reading TD on Fridays.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Meanwhile, in the Hall of Doom (FBI)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
He wants to do the illegal search so that he can find probable cause to justify the search. That's not how things work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Should be part of the law if it's not already...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If anything it appears to imply the opposite.
And yes they just might have a pet judge to rubber stamp everything.
They just left those 250 out to say see, see wer are doing it right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Too hard? Too bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Too hard? Too bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Contempt for Legal System
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Robowarrants!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ben Franklin in February 17, 1775
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
so now that we still have the Patriot act still in effect. thos b*st*rds can do any thing thet want
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FBI obtains valid warrants for 91% of GPS devices order shut off by court.
See, you seem willing to mostly gloss over the main point that, in the end, the units were still pretty much all used in ways that would be considered valid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
1) the device may be attached only in respect to a current, ongoing investigation, and the use of the data obtained limited only to that investigation.
2) device may only be attached to a car when it is in a public space or on commercial property (such as shopping center parking, example).
3) no data about the location of the car or it's movements while on private property can be considered
4) a notice of use to be filed with the courts within 7 days, at which time the device may be ordered removed and the data collected destroyed, and any investigation as a result of the data not be allowed for use in prosecution.
So basically, making it so that the police cannot apply the unit without an ongoing investigation, be required to inform the court, and give the court the ability to nul it out if need be.
My thoughts are this: Police are chasing a getaway car from a robbery. A gps device magnet mounted might be able to get attached to the get away car to allow them to track it without a high speed chase. However, if GPS (or other technilogy) tracking requires a warrant, the police would be forced to not consider such an option. There should be a way to do things that allows the courts to get involved, without slowly or impeding law enforcement actions, especially when those actions are done with good volition and intention.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So sad!
Awww, their ability will be inhibited. So sad! I imagine it will cause erectile dysfunction too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It probably looks something like this:
Monday morning: Rubber stamped until arm tired. Denied remaining 250.
Or if you want to cut them some slack; the 250 were easy "deny" cases (like, the "reason to spy" box was empty) and they assumed everything else was "OK".
I would not even be surprised anymore if it went more like this:
"We can't approve all of them, it will look fishy, we need to deny some. Yes Adam? Sure, 250 sounds about right, we'll roll with that. Then we can say over 90% was approved, that has a nice ring to it."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Taps playing quietly in background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]