SpaceX 'Test' Flight Off And Running

from the well-that's-nice dept

Well, well. After some delays and an aborted attempt a few days ago, it appears that the SpaceX "test" flight to get a bit of cargo into orbit and aimed at the International Space Station has worked according to plan -- and we're now a step closer to a private space program (photo from NASA):
The SpaceX folks webcast the whole thing from its website (hopefully, they'll post the video for people to rewatch -- as of right now there's nothing). The White House immediately offered its congratulations for "the potential of a new era in American spaceflight..." powered by the private sector.

This is the second time that SpaceX has gotten this far, but rather than just orbiting the earth a couple times, the current mission goal is to have the Dragon capsule actually dock with the International Space Station (and deliver some food). The actual docking process is a bit complex, apparently, so there are still some worries. However, things certainly seem to be progressing.

And, of course, this is just one of many stepping stones towards actually offering private manned spaceflight, which goes beyond just touching the edges of space, but actually into orbit. Either way, it's an important milestone along the way.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: international space station, nasa, orbit, private space program, space
Companies: spacex


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    teka, 22 May 2012 @ 2:14am

    bravo SpaceX!

    and it looks like the webcast is being replayed through livestream on demand, just hit play.

    http://new.livestream.com/accounts/142499/events/626741

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    teka, 22 May 2012 @ 2:17am

    oops, nevermind, that is video from the abort.


    second time was the charm it seems!
    it's not like this is rocket science or something

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    fogbugzd (profile), 22 May 2012 @ 3:29am

    Cue the patent trolls now that SpaceX has had a successful launch in 3..2..1...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 3:31am

    http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/05/bi-liquid-success-at-copenhagen-suborbitals/

    Another milestone is Copenhagen Suborbitals tested their liquid rocket engine successfully.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 3:43am

    "powered by the private sector."

    with everything learned from the government, it is an accomplishment, yes, but its pretty easy when you 50 plus years of stuff to learn from

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 3:48am

    Re:

    Yeah. It's so easy, any idiot could do it.

    In fact, it's so easy that NASA has pretty much given up putting people in space. I guess it is just not challenging enough.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 3:53am

    Re:

    Also, don't forget that the only reason the US was even able to put a rocket in space was because they "stole" the technology and "abducted" the experts of said technology from Nazi Germany.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 3:54am

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Major Tom, 22 May 2012 @ 4:15am

    Given that the private sector cuts corners more than government run programs, I will not be signing up for their manned space program.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    MrWilson, 22 May 2012 @ 5:53am

    I hope this means we can further cut the NASA budget and spend it on education or something else more practical for those of us who aren't interested in finding exoplanets or knowing how much space dust there is per cubic parsec in a particular region of space...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), 22 May 2012 @ 7:01am

    Re:

    Please be sarcasm....please, please, please!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 8:19am

    Re:

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but this comes from NASA's budget: NASA is paying SpaceX for cargo transport to the ISS.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    E. Zachary Knight (profile), 22 May 2012 @ 8:31am

    Re:

    The saying "Good enough for government work" is based on real life experience. I have never once heard anyone say "Good enough for private sector work" Have you?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. icon
    The eejit (profile), 22 May 2012 @ 8:50am

    Re:

    Did you nearly make the Grade?

    'Cause that's the only reason i can think of for the reason why you posted that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 May 2012 @ 10:19am

    So, the era of Space Pirates can begin?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    MrWilson, 22 May 2012 @ 11:15am

    Re: Re:

    Astronauts don't need food brought to them. They can just use the on-board replicators!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    Rekrul, 22 May 2012 @ 12:00pm

    I'm amazed that they got this far- without the government stepping in and imposing a ton of regulations on them and basically drowning the entire project in a sea of red tape.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. icon
    Michael Long (profile), 22 May 2012 @ 3:08pm

    Re: Re:

    Any idiot could do it... or not.

    North Korea's embarrassing rocket launch failure sparks multi-nation search for debris
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57413501/north-koreas-embarrassing-rocket-launch-failure -sparks-multi-nation-search-for-debris/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. icon
    Chargone (profile), 27 May 2012 @ 7:57pm

    Re: Re:

    amusingly, here abouts, at one point government work, at least when it came to construction, was somewhat famous for the exact opposite, causing many complaints about things being over budget or whatever.

    'over engineering' they called it.

    funny how one such over-engineered building was pretty much the least damaged brick structure in several major earthquakes...

    (it was a railway station. built to deal with the vibrations of the trains coming and going and such like. they went a bit nuts with the structural integrity, to the point where, from memory, the sum total damage was a few bricks coming loose from the top of the clock tower. compared to a lot of other stone and brick buildings outright Collapsing, that's pretty impressive.)

    about the only area where government work is Known for being sloppy here-abouts is budgets and when ideology or greed gets in the way of facts when it comes to law making.

    cutting corners and such Is a lot more common in the private sector here. at least that you hear about. (and again, usually with construction.)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  20. icon
    Chargone (profile), 27 May 2012 @ 7:59pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    errr...

    though, with the constant budget cuts and reorganizations in the name of 'efficiency' rather than getting things done Properly, i wouldn't be surprised to see that change...

    (seriously: when all costs are affordable and the outcome is superior, the less efficient way is better. one boosts efficiency to save on raw materials or increase output without lowering quality. if you're lowering quality in the name of efficiency as if efficiency were some perfect goal, you're doing it wrong.

    many governments and businesses need to learn this.)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  21. icon
    Chargone (profile), 27 May 2012 @ 8:03pm

    Re:

    fun fact: a New Zealand company (or private entity of some sort at least) was working on a similar sort of project.

    they kept running into brick walls trying to get parts due to US regulations about the parts they were after being 'strategic resources' or some such.

    their response was to make their own.

    what they made was, in many cases, so good, that the suppliers they were not permitted to buy from switched to buying from Them and using Their parts.

    they also did some fun stuff with eco-friendly fuel.

    from memory, the main problem with their setup was that their first major launch (which was on tv and everything)... the capsule with the test results (and a couple of science experiments or something) was lost at sea. it apparently came down properly and everything but sank or something before they could retrieve it.

    all the spaceflight bits worked fine.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.