How Having A Good Sense Of Humor Helps Cope With Piracy And Succeed Despite It
from the survive-the-nuclear-winter dept
Piracy is one of those things that is pervasive throughout video gaming. It has become a force of nature, a fact of life. While many companies attempt to fight piracy of their works through DRM or complaining loudly, others are taking a very different approach. Last year we posted a story about a company called tinyBuild that decided to embrace piracy rather than fight it. It released a special pirate themed version of its game on the Pirate Bay and saw a positive response from it. When discussing the move, tinyBuild stated, "I mean, some people are going to torrent it either way, we might as well make something funny out of it." By having a positive sense of humor in the face of piracy, one indie game developer was able to cope with it and succeed despite it.This sense of humor is catching on too. Gamasutra highlights another indie dev, Paul Greasley, that, when faced with the realities of piracy, decided to approach it with a bit of tongue in cheek. The developers of the game Under the Ocean released the game under three different options. The first was early, cheap access to the game for $7. The second was a more feature rich and personalized version for $25. The third was a hat tip to piracy.
The Cockroach edition was actually not an attempt to cut down on piracy. It was just one of the liberties of being an indie developer, with nobody to answer to. The elephant in the room is that 90 percent+ of people are going to pirate your game on the PC (and ours is no exception, based on the traffic logs). We just thought it would be fun, and frankly honest, to point that out!To further seal the deal, Paul had originally included a link to the Pirate Bay. Unfortunately, some wet blankets in the indie scene overreacted to the inclusion of the link. Those developers had claimed that the inclusion of the link was Paul condoning piracy, something he denies. So, to put out the fires and save his cred with those developers, he removed the link while leaving the rest of the option on the site.
It is quite interesting that he even included the link to begin with. Most developers, especially those from large studios, try to do their best to pretend that such sites don't exist in the off chance they accidentally convert a potential customer into a pirate. Including the link was a massive show of openness with fans. By showing that he knows what the competition is, he was showing fans that he understands what it takes to build up a loyal following.
We're going to be releasing a whole bunch of frequent updates, with lots of feature additions. If you want to stay up to date, buying it is much easier than pirating it. The users win, because it's DRM free and they get a bunch of cool new updates for Under the Ocean, and we win, because the updates get us new ways to promote the game outside our game forums.By recognizing the reality of piracy, Paul was able to identify features and services that will build loyal fans, things like avoiding DRM and providing frequent updates, not just for the game but from himself. What this means for Paul and his game is that players get a great experience from someone who is open, human and honest and in return they will spend more money on his game.
Make a product people want and will talk about, make that product as good as you possibly can, and treat your customer base with respect.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cockroach edition, competing, humor, paul greasley, piracy, video games
Companies: tinybuild
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
FarmerGnome rocks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nathandog04@yahoo.com
A lot of you younger types might not remember, but I think we "old farts" had it worse with DRM. DRM used to come in the form of a special pair or green glasses that were made of paper (Lemmings) or having to buy a travel guide book known as Foder's (The original 800k floppy version of Wher in the USA is Carmen Sandiego). At least there is a way around most forms of DRM now.
The fact that this dev used "piracy" in a tiered system of updates is ingenious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
Indeed, and remember dongles?
In fact, outside of the mainstream games industry, the software industry largely learned form their mistakes dealing with piracy. Specifically, that DRM will cost you more in tech support, goodwill, and lost sales than piracy will.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
This, plus the cost of Minecraft is $15, paid once. They keep updating the software based on customer requests, and they support most, if not all operating systems. But mainly because Notch isn't an asshat.
I'd love to get the days back that I've spent playing that darn game. Addictive doesn't even come close to describing it...it is almost like Notch purified cocaine and put it into software.
Although, I'd say that creepers have to be the most asshat move Notch did to us players. I don't know how many times I had those things sneak up on me and blow me up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think allot of devs get it, but corporate doesn't agree.
Video's on kickstarter: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/leisuresuitlarry/make-leisure-suit-larry-come-again
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
I dont recall having them, I didnt use a PC until the school my dad was teaching at switched to PC use in 1998. Now that i have an idea what they were used for in copy protection, this makes me apreciate the ever so "slow" Mac Plus and Apple Quadra 605 Macs I grew up with.
As far back as "modern" DRM is concerned, I still have Cosmic Osmo and The Worlds Beyond The Makerel CD-ROM (it's availible on Steam now). The bonus sound track can be ripped but the data on the disc can't be coppied.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
No wonder it was pirated :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
Still the history of it has amazes me. I'm 26 years old so Lemmings on the Macintosh and Where In The USA Carman Sandiago were my challenges.
The saddest part of the classic DRM is that it prevented history being preserved.
Oh crap, there's my e-mail in the subject header :-( It's a dummy account but I use it in just in case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
I miss the days of silly DRM schema.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
Lemmings for the Macintosh had a special pair of uniquely green shaded glasses. It was one of those "put the magic glasses on to find the hidden symbol on this page and match it" sort of things.
Carmen Sandiago USA made you buy a copy of Foder's USA travel guide to answer those questions so you could advance from the rank of Gumshoe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Piracy"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "Piracy"
I sure hope you called Disney and asked them to stop using Pirates of the Caribbean in their parks and in their crappy movies. Those uses did far more to add legitimacy than Captain Cook and his brotheren of privateers did.
/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
Also I'm a prince of something
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
EVERYBOBY PANIC
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
DRM is there to try to stop you from making more copies of the DRM'd thing, the lock on the chess set is there to keep you from taking the one that's already there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Iphones prove this point, app devs claim 90% piracy rates but only about 20% of phones are jailbroken and able to pirate. The upshot of this is that at most 20% of the market is pirate (there are lots of reasons to jailbreak so actual number is likely lower) but that part of the market consumes VASTLY more apps than the other 80%.
People forget that pirates have effectively unlimited buying power when compeered to people who are limited by the money they have to spend. Any given game has a HUGE potential market but turning that potential in to actual sales has a very high attrition rate. People have their budget for buying media for the month and you are competing to get them to spend money on your product rather than some one else's. So only a relatively small number of the people who might buy the game actually do for any number of reasons.
What you get when you put that number up against the number of people who pirate is a statistical mismatch of sets. The pirates are not limited in what they download so they can be a "consumer" of vastly more content than some one who pays for the game. Pirates are in effect a set that represents that initial potential market, rather than the people who have paid who represent a set of actual market share.
Most of us here are of a mind that piracy does not really effect sales that much so we naturally look at a 90% piracy rate and think "that can't be right? can it?" but we need to stop trying to downplay these rates because we really need to start building a better understanding of what these rates actually mean.
Less than 20% of a market can drive 90% rates of use if that 20% use a lot more than the other 80%. That is actually a relatively simple concept once you wrap your head around it. What's really important about it is that it's an argument that supports the idea that piracy is much less damaging than the industry thinks with out having to argue with them over the numbers.
If we make them think differently about what those numbers mean and find ways to prove it to them (such as more research in to the whole iphone thing) then we defuse the most powerful data they are throwing around with facts rather than an assumption that they must me making it up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It is a great web site and as far as I am concerned, way more socially cool than Facebook could ever be. Go there and check the comments. All the detractors are just jealous, they wish they had such a successful web site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Infinity just doesn't compute.
It can't be related to any non-zero price tag for the game. That's where the real disconnect starts. People confuse infinity with a meaningful number.
They get it into their head that all of those moochers represent potential full price sales when it can't even be reasonably compared to even a purchase for a single cent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Citation, please? What data - other than wishful thinking - are you prepared to offer in support of this statement?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nathandog04@yahoo.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]