Italian Public Prosecutor Says File-Sharing Site Is 'Receiving Stolen Goods'
from the copying-is-not-theft dept
Sites that share unauthorized copies of various kinds of digital files are hardly news, and neither are attempts to shut them down. But a recent case in Italy breaks fresh ground here:
The Milan public prosecutor has ordered the seizure of assets of the Avaxhome "digital newsstand", a portal for "sharing" newspapers, books, comics and music DVDs. The claim of receiving stolen goods against the site was validated by the investigating magistrate in Milan after a complaint by Italian publishing group Mondadori in June. The website is based in Russia, and Italian ISPs have now blocked access to the site.
Since the site is based in Russia, seizing its assets might prove tricky. But what makes this decision important is the fact that the public prosecutor in Milan has gone beyond finding that the site infringes on copyright, and deemed it to be "receiving stolen goods" -- a far more serious charge.
As Fulvio Sarzana, the author of the blog post quoted above and lawyer for the Italian ISP association, explains (original in Italian):
"This seizure is a serious problem because for the first time in Italy and in the world putting copies of articles on the Web is considered to be receiving stolen property and not only infringement of copyright." According to the lawyer, "the risk is that from now on anyone whoever puts copies of articles on the Web will see their site closed and be on the receiving end of a charge that equates this case to that of a car thief."
Sarzana says that the Italian ISP association will appeal, so it's not certain that this dangerous equivalence will stand. But it's a worrying prospect that copyright infringement might be routinely equated to theft in this way, since the two are completely different for reasons that have been discussed many times here on Techdirt.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, italy, stolen goods
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are "property (tm)" afterall you know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No? Those items/files are all still where they were before, even after having been copied and shared? Not exactly 'stealing' then is it.
Infringement, sure. Stealing? Not so much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Protip: Wait until Spring this time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
Or are we all doomed to be charged with theft? ... OH, WAIT! I've got it! Just DON'T INFRINGE COPYRIGHT!
Problem solved. Next re-write.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
2) I'm sayin it now anyway. Under current regs, being sure you are not infringing copyright is impossible. Yes, even if you live as a hermit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
"OH, WAIT! I've got it! Just DON'T INFRINGE COPYRIGHT!"
See, the problem with that is people infringe on copyright every day. Most unknowingly. The majority of which do so both unknowingly and innocently. Like reposting a picture they saw online or something like that.
So yeah, there really is NO way to avoid the risk. Also, what you fail to realize is that we now have a court INCORRECTLY conflating the act of making a digital copy with the actual act of theft, which actually involves physically depriving someone of something. The difference between making a copy and depriving someone is huge and should not be ignored just because one doesn't approve of the former.
But as I said, you're an idiot. Like I said before, stop posting your brand of stupidity. From now on, just save us all time and write, "TL;DCTR. You're wrong." TL;DCTR standing for "too long, didn't care to read", since that's your usual modus operandi.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
And also DOUBLE THIS regarding the mere accusation of infringement being tantamount to a conviction. We already have six strikes programs being discussed and considered for mass deployment, six strikes for which no proof is provided against you merely an accusation, which you are then FORCED to pay just to be given the CHANCE to defend yourself and say "nuh uh". Or else, bye bye internet connection.
That's a pretty scary/sad state of affairs. But people like Idiot up above would have you think that an accusation of infringement is the equivalent of actual theft and should be punished equally, if not more severely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
By your logic if they next say that copyright infringement is murder (you know, it threatens someone's income which is what they need to survive, so that makes it life-threatening, so you're killing them), and your reply: "well, if you don't want to be charged with murder, just DON'T INFRINGE COPYRIGHT!"
Now, in case you don't get it, I'm using something called reductio ad absurdem. I'm not saying you actually would think this. I'm saying that your argument is equally logical as this absurd example, and I sure hope you aren't so insane that you think even this absurd example is reasonable. Cheers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Gee, is there NO way to avoid this risk?
Problem Solved.
Or not, given what you said is that if you don't want to be charged with doing something you legally have not done you should not break another law.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems right...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Par for the course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Par for the course.
There are tons of great Italians and great people of Italian Descent.Lots of other great stuff in Italy.
Government is pretty Corrupted ! Then again there is not much of a difference here in Washington or in a bunch of other Nation's Governments.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Par for the course.
I think Italy is in huge beep. They cannot kill 9% of their GDP. That is far out in TBTF! Sure, they are doing ok in bringing down dept and they are doing ok economically, but just like France, they have severe fundamental problems in the economy and this desperate definition is just another brick in the wall.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Par for the course.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Par for the course.
However, nearly every media report I've ever read about what scientists say have falsely reported scientists claiming things they never claimed at all.
The problem is not with the scientists, it's with the media.
Disclaimer: Every group of people has it's frauds and loonies, of course, and scientists are no different. This is, in part, why you go with group consensus rather than a single scientist's findings. On the whole it's impossible to find a more reliable source of facts than those form the scientific community.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Par for the course.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/07/epic-fraud-how-to-succeed-in-science-without-doing- any/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Par for the course.
There are a number of such examples, and almost every single one of them were caught by the scientific community. The examples of fraud are a miniscule percentage of the whole, as well.
As I said, every group has bad apples. What gives credibility to the group is what happens when the bad apples are discovered. Scientists expose them and ignore their results from then on.
I literally cannot think of how the community could behave that would be more credible. As to house-cleaning, the house is extremely clean. Not spotless (nothing is perfect), but the house cleaning is constant and ongoing.
But in any case, your original comment wasn't about fraud, it was about scientists claiming to know things that they don't know. Scientists are extremely careful to avoid doing this, to a fault.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What can he do?
If the Milan public prosecutor really wants to try out this novel legal theory (and not just do it to a Russian for the theater of it) I'm sure there are digital thieves in Milan. Raid THEM, and try to take these 'stolen goods' in hand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We already can't sing happy birthday to our kids, but it's going to get way worse before it gets better..
On the flip side, if things get worse fast enough, people notice. The mafiaa needs to maintain the boiling frog effect, if they turn up the heat too much the people will wake up and jump out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Any rewards?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Turn this back on the news sites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Question!
That way, if I have to delete them, I can collect insurance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Third party being ANYONE other then me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Assumption
Maybe we can charge any airport warehouse for "Receiving Stolen Goods" because some passengers transport the stolen items out through there? How does that make sense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeah called stealing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]