ICANN's New Trademark 'Clearinghouse' Resembles Mobsters' 'Insurance' Program
from the nice-trademark-you've-got-here,-wouldn't-want-anything-to-happen-to-it dept
We've pointed out for years that ICANN's new "top level domains" programs often feel much more like a way to shake down trademark holders who feel the need to buy each and every new domain with their trademarked names, just to prevent anyone else from getting them. Now, ICANN has taken this a step further, streamlining the process by launching a "trademark clearinghouse" in which companies can register a trademark and get early access to "buy" all of the new top level domains with their mark before they reach the open market. Of course, "supporters" are pushing companies to join... and the pitch really does sound like your typical mob shakedown:The clearinghouse "doesn't necessarily prevent trademark infringement or cybersquatting, but it does help trademark owners and brand owners somewhat in mitigating the damage that might occur," he added. "We've been telling brand owners it's not that expensive to protect themselves and they ought to do it."I mean, paying the local mob boss "doesn't necessarily prevent anyone from breaking your windows, but it does help in mitigating the likelihood that damage might occur." And "it's not that expensive to protect yourself, so you ought to do it."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: domain names, protection, tlds, trademark
Companies: icann
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Welcome to the Corporate States of America! Land of the fee!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's a real nice looking trademark you got there. It'd a shame if something were to happen to it....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For your Protection of course!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hand over power to a corporation and it's criminal.
And yes, Google IS related because like every corporation, if Google could exercise full monopoly power and outright steal, it would. It's iron law: power will be wielded as much as can get away with. Corporations are totally amoral, hide behind statutes that make their prime responsibility to get yet more unearned income for the tiny few who own stock, and public be damned.
Whether it's "Hollywood" or ICANN or Google, corporations always act exactly Mike as shows here: a fictional person shielded from any responsibility to serve the public, end up as shakedowns for re-distribution schemes for The Rich.
And that's the rest of the story, the part that Mike always leaves out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
First it was 'Filthy Pirates' when people stick it to the corps, now it's 'Filthy Corps' when they stick it back to the people.
One of these days, you are gonna have to choose a side, otherwise you are no better than the 'sheeple' you always preach about.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
(...because they registered 'yourdomain.crud' and are using it to scam your users)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Either way, despicable though ICANN's (government aided) practices are, the idea of them being responsible for protecting someone else's trademarks is about as sensible as holding an ISP or phone company responsible for data customers put over their infrastructure. Or holding an electricity supplier liable for the drug lab their supply powers...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hand over power to a corporation and it's criminal.
Where is the rest of the story you leave out?
You seem to advocate for a redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor, but never say how you would achieve that.
Are you going to penalize people for becoming TOO successful? Who is going to determine what is too much income, you?
Are you going to penalize corporations for becoming to big? Once again, who decides what is too big, you?
Or would you replace our current capitalistic economy with something different? Something like Socialism? Do you want us all to be working for the state-owned entities? That didn't work out so well in Russia, you know.
Come on Blue, enlighten us. Tell us how you would run the world if you were actually something more than just some anonymous guy in the internet.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Godfather, the Rosetti Brothers burned down my store! They beat up my brother, insulted the memory of my sister's cat. For years I pay you money, and now I only ask that you teach them a lesson."
"Hold on, let me check the policy. Well, I can beat up one Rosetti brother, but you have to beat up the first 4 yourself. Also you lose your no-claims bonus."
(Thanks to comedian Mark Steel for that one.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
His side is "not Mike's", even when it's an article he agrees with. Almost makes you wonder if The Anti-Mike is back.
[ link to this | view in thread ]