Even An East Texas Court Has Told Uniloc That It Can't Patent Math

from the there-are-limits,-people dept

Even a notoriously patent-friendly court like the district court in East Texas has admitted that there are limits to what's patentable. Notorious patent troll Uniloc, whose name has been appearing quite frequently lately, has lost one part of its big cases, against Rackspace, after the district court in Tyler, Texas has said one of the patents in question in this lawsuit, US Patent 5,892,697 on a "Method and apparatus for handling overflow and underflow in processing floating-point numbers," is really patenting basic mathematical functions, and you can't do that.
Claim 1, then, is merely an improvement on a mathematical formula. Even when tied to computing, since floating-point numbers are a computerized numeric format, the conversion of floating-point numbers has applications across fields as diverse as science, math, communications, security, graphics, and games. Thus, a patent on Claim 1 would cover vast end uses, impeding the onward march of science.
While this is nice, this is just one patent in that particular lawsuit, and Uniloc has dozens of other patents that it's using in other lawsuits. And Uniloc shows no signs of slowing down. Just the other day it filed 12 new lawsuits.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: east texas, math, patent trolling, patents
Companies: rackspace, uniloc


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Shmerl, 29 Mar 2013 @ 12:36am

    Typical addict behavior - they got addicted to getting money through ridiculous patent claims. They really need some serious treatment with anti patent medicine.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 29 Mar 2013 @ 12:58am

    Re:

    Applied via benchslap hopefully.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 2:27am

    Coming soon from the people who locked up Numbers©...
    Letters©!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 4:02am

    So if they can't patent math, can they patent fake math?
    eg. 2+2=Fish

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    anonymouse, 29 Mar 2013 @ 4:15am

    Re:

    Greed is a terrible thing in most cases, not all but most.
    If anything i see them coming under a very bright spotlight , with very powerful people looking for anything to attack them, be it something from the distant past to something created on the spur of the moment, As always with these types their greed will be their downfall.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 5:33am

    If the patent is for "Method and apparatus for handling overflow and underflow in processing floating-point numbers,"
    ...don't they actually have to have a working "apparatus"?
    And if they have a working "apparatus", if somone has a different "apparatus" which achieves the same end result, it wouldn't violate their patent!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 6:12am

    who's the patent officer who approved it

    if he was liable for a chunk of the lawyer fees, I think that might encourage more careful review in the future.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 8:13am

    Wait ... rational thought processes in Texas?
    This is amazing.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    jackn, 29 Mar 2013 @ 8:24am

    Re:

    Underflow, that genious, ill give them that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    Wally (profile), 29 Mar 2013 @ 8:31am

    Re:

    "If the patent is for "Method and apparatus for handling overflow and underflow in processing floating-point numbers,"
    ...don't they actually have to have a working "apparatus"?
    And if they have a working "apparatus", if somone has a different "apparatus" which achieves the same end result, it wouldn't violate their patent!"

    Buffering...they drew up a patent for buffering data...by the looks of it graphics data...specifically 3D rendering and animation...and yes they are not patentable which is why most companies like nVidia and AMD keep those formulas a secret.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Mr. Crocker, 29 Mar 2013 @ 9:15am

    Re:

    At last! Undeniable proof of the existence of...
    FAIRY GODPATENTS!!!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. icon
    Anonymous Monkey (profile), 29 Mar 2013 @ 9:51am

    Re: Re: Benchslap

    Apply directly to the back of the head...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    special-interesting (profile), 29 Mar 2013 @ 4:22pm

    Hooray for the East Texas district court they got one right so far! (appeals still to come.)

    Don't want to be cynical but are they under some federal review or something as this seems very not like them. Don't get me wrong am proud of them for any reason a decent court opinion (IMHO) appears.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2013 @ 4:35pm

    Patent/copyright trolls highlight beautifully the perils of granted monopolies, and why they should be restricted to the bare minimum to actually accomplish anything.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. icon
    tomxp411 (profile), 1 Apr 2013 @ 8:43am

    Grrr... Uniloc chaps my hide, but Google seems to be apathetic.

    Uniloc is apparently also suing Android app makers for using a feature built in to the operating system

    What bothers me about this is that when you go to Google to ask about this, they're all "Sorry. We can't help. You need to deal with them yourself."

    And you're all, "But you wrote and distributed teh Android. How can can this be patented?"

    And Google's all "Sorry."

    And Uniloc rakes in the millions that it has extorted from people.

    http://www.x-plane.com/x-world/lawsuit/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. icon
    tomxp411 (profile), 1 Apr 2013 @ 8:46am

    Re:

    Patent trolls bring me back around to my original assertion about patents vs lawsuits:

    Copyright law says that if I independently come up with a similar or even identical piece of code/music/writing as someone else, I still get to own and use my creation.

    Patent law says that if I invent something that someone else also invented, the first person to invent it "wins," and the other person loses out on his invention.

    This is wrong, and changing this one thing would be enough to completely fix the patent system.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.