Student Wins Intel Science Fair; Threatened With Patent Infringement Claims For Patent Not Yet Granted
from the because-that's-how-we-do-things-these-days dept
So it goes in America. No one's immune from the threat of patent litigation, not even 18-year high school students in possession of an award-winning science project in one of the most prestigious science fairs around. (Tip of the hat to TD reader Jeff for sending this over.)
Eesha Khare, an 18-year-old senior at Lynbrook High School in San Jose, Calif., won both the first prize at the Intel Science Fair and the Project of the Year award for the senior division of the California State Science Fair with her research on supercapacitors.Kahrl Retti, CEO of Solaroad Technologies, LLC, showed up in the comment thread (assisted by Nick Cameron, also of Solaroad) at Tech World to make some noise about the wrong person being credited with this invention.
However, her work has also attracted the attention of the company that holds a patent involving similar technology, and its CEO says he may be forced to bring legal action against her if she tries to commercialize it.
[K]hare’s work violates a 2005 patent filed by green energy company Solaroad Technologies, according to company CEO Kahrl Retti. He says he has been working on similar technology since the 1980s, and that while Khare’s work is impressive, it is in violation of the patents involving nanocapacitor technology that Solaroad Technologies has already commercialized.
Retti's comment:
Once again the media has credited the wrong person with inventing a technology. The inventor of this tech filed Patent applications worldwide 7 years ago on this very tech.Nick's comment:
Although Eesha's work is commendable, the media has indeed credited the wrong person with this invention. Solaroad Technologies, a solar innovation company located in Baltimore, MD was the original inventor of the nano battery and holds patent applications worldwide on it. Their CEO (Kahrl Retti) has been in the nanostructure field for years. Directed towards the writer, please check your facts.Cameron went even further on Solaroad's Facebook page: [UPDATE: This post has vanished from Solaroad's Facebook page, so here's a screenshot. Link will now take you to the cached version.]
Once again, the media has given the credit to the wrong person for this invention. This technology was developed by Solaroad Technologies and invented by Kahrl Retti in the 1980's. Patents have been filed worldwide on this tech since 2005. Retti developed and produced nanorod capacitors and has documentation regarding the tech dating to 1988. Scientists from General Electric, General Motors, and Kiment.Pay attention to what's being stated here (which is different than what's being stated in Network World's story). Both Retti and Cameron state only that "patent applications" (or "patents" in the FB post) have been "filed." At this point, neither Retti nor his company actually hold a patent on this technology, at least not in the US. The only patent potentially related to Khare's project that can be traced back to Retti or Solaroad is this one -- an application filed in 2006 (and with a priority date of 2005). [This application seems more relevant, but Retti keeps throwing around the 2005 date.] A search of the USPTO database returns only the following list of granted patents for Retti (most of which deal with taping gypsumboard) and nothing at all for Solaroad.
It is a great disservice to credit this 18 year old with a technology that was invented and developed before she was even born. The scientific community tends to ignore the patent office and only publishes papers fro academic sources, the tech media also ignores the patent office. IT IS A GOOD WAY TO GET SUED
Holding an application is nowhere near as effective as holding an actual patent. While some royalties may be collected from infringement that occurred after the application was published, certain stipulations must be met before the original applicant can make a claim for damages. One of these requirements is that the infringer must have "actual notice" of the published patent. It's hard to imagine that most (if any) science fair projects begin with a patent search, so the noise Solaroad's making only serves one purpose: to inform the involved parties that a.) it exists, b.) it's willing to sue and c.) it's filed an application(s) that might tenuously be related to Khare's work. If she chooses to commercialize her supercapacitor work, Retti can claim she had "actual notice."
That, and Retti just seems bitter that a high school student is garnering all of this attention.
“I would never consciously hurt or cast aspersions on anybody. I just simply wanted to put somebody on notice that we already developed this technology,” Retti said in a phone interview with Network World. “I don’t want to hurt this girl’s feelings or anybody else’s. I’m just frustrated after trying to get Intel or Google to talk to us for decades, and they won’t even talk to me, but they’re jumping on this bandwagon.”If Intel and Google are interested, it's because Khare's project could help push advances in portable device construction.
“I don’t want to pee on anyone’s parade and I don’t want to stop any technology that could be for the greater good of the world, but I’m here to say that I did it,” Retti says.
Khare’s work with supercapacitors could make a difference in the design and performance of smartphone batteries, which, in turn, could help make flexible smartphones a reality... In a test, Khare’s supercapacitor boasted a capacitance of 238.5 Farads per gram, a substantial improvement from the 80 Farads per gram achieved with alternative designs. Practically, supercapacitors could help make for smaller internal components in smartphones.Solaroad, as may be gathered by its name, has positioned itself as an alternative energy company, even going so far as attempting to design its own electric vehicle. If Retti's been unable to match up his (still pending) patent with the priorities of Google and Intel (with an 8-year head start, no less), that's hardly Khare's fault. Shutting down someone else's innovation simply to protect your own rut is exactly the sort of behavior that has people calling for a complete overhaul of the patent system.
Perhaps Retti should spend less time fretting about inventive 18-year-olds and start refining its existing product line. A visit to Solaroad's site gives you the feeling the products it's touting have endless upside, but digging around a little more leads to the impression that its main products exist only as PDFs and Powerpoint presentations.
Here's Solaroad's $500,000 crowdfunding attempt to get its GridKicker solar generation/storage device off the ground. It seems to have stalled after receiving only $30 in contributions in four months. (One of the donors is quite possibly Kahrl Retti's son, Kahrl Retti Jr. [aka Johnny Columbine]). Another comment on its Facebook page (dated October of 2012) seems to indicate Solaroad isn't manufacturing any of its products at this point.
We are currently looking for an investment to start manufacturing. Any questions can be asked through telephone or email. Thanks!While throwing around nearly baseless legal threats, Solaroad might want to be a bit more careful with its careless shouts of "infringement." One of its "future products" is SolarFilm:
SolarFilm is a sprayable nano-based solar technology that creates energy by using heat, light, and magnetics. It's unique formulation of photovoltaic (PV) and thermionic chemical compositions make it one of the most advanced solar technologies ever created. SolarFilm is durable, efficient, and extremely versatile. It can be easily applied to a variety of surfaces, such as roadways, shingles, siding, vehicle paints and much more.This bears quite a resemblance to SolaRoad, another solar-generation-via-roadway-application product developed by Dutch company TNO. This is due for a test run in 2013, with an eye towards replacing all 85,000+ km of the Netherlands' roads and bike paths with the combination solar panel/concrete hybrid.
There's likely no infringement occurring here (in either direction), but Retti and Solaroad have shown they're more than willing to take offense at independent invention. This does very little for whatever legal case it may try to pursue, but it does a great deal towards crafting some very negative "publicity."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: intel science fair, kahrl retti, nick cameron, patent trolls, patents, supercapacitors
Companies: solaroad technologies
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Their patents applications are dead anyway...
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FP TO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PG01&Query=rettithey abandoned the 20070028958 patent application in 2012 after many failed efforts.
the patent examiner who had rejected 123 out of 126 claims for the 20090133733 application just smacked the remaining 3 which are crappy anyway.
I dont want to pee on anyones parade...just saying....
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Solar road
I remember reading a detailed description in a story published in Analog Science Fiction/Science Fact Magazine back in the early seventies. I've always wondered why no one in all that time did anything with this obvious idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Heck up until the 90's nobody could learn anything because access was so difficult and buzz was hard to create in smaller real life communities, with virtual communities though, knowledge and the transfer of it is lubricated by the speed of light transmission of data packets all over the world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
-- Wit, The Way of Kings, Brandon Sanderson
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Except you did by implying the girl was ripping you off rather than the affair being a simple matter of independent invention.
I dont want to pee on anyones parade...
Yet pee you do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If she found technology to help/solve the problems the company has been sitting on for 20+ years (developed in 1980s and not produced by 2013?!), maybe they'd get more money from employing the student rather than suing them?!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Solar road
[ link to this | view in thread ]
@ Applesauce. Not at all practical is why.
Geez, you're trying to piss all over someone's 1980's parade in favor of an incrental advance! You seem to be setting aside all prior art. May be worthwhile -- for the limited uses: the power density of this or any capacitor doesn't get anywhere near that of a battery -- but it's not going to revolutionize anything.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What they're saying..
"No, our stuff isn't so simple that a high school kid thought of it - she must have stolen it from us. There is no way that she could have come up with it herself because that would invalidate our patent applications."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: @ Applesauce. Not at all practical is why.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A high-school kid just proved that this particular invention is obvious to persons NOT skilled in the art. Patent application rejected.
Done.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ouch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I can assure you that she is. She managed to make the device, which is accomplishment enough, and takes pre-existing skill.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Corporations and the people they are made of
The portion of the article that provoked the most thought for me involved the Sloaroad CEO Kahrl Retti and another Solaroad employee Nick Cameron.
It is often stated in the press that corporations are amoral by their very nature and measure success by putting profits above all else.
The Solaroad CEO deciding to take the moral low road regarding the science Fair winner Eesha Khare by threatening a possible lawsuit for something the article says they hold no U.S. patent on, shows that perhaps the amorality of corporations comes from the actions of those that run the corporations.
I wonder if Kahrl Retti stopped for one minute to consider how he would feel if he had a daughter that was threatened in a similar manner by a corporation.
I suspect he did not for one instant pause for that introspection. I believe he saw dollars dancing in his head... dollars that were dancing away from his wallet towards someone else.
This sounds like someone that is motivated by greed above all else.
Another respondent here opined about Solaroad offering a job to the science fair winner. That is a most excellent idea... but apparently greed clouded the judgment that would have allowed for that decision.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yup! Seriously lame
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Really? She solved a problem they've been working on longer than she's been alive?
What does that say about them?
They need a new PR rep. They should have at least offered her an internship or job there. I think that would have been the easiest way to silence her. Since she'd be working for them, they would own everything she does.
Progress is made with collaboration, not litigation.
Oh I forgot, companies aren't interested in progress, just money. Carry on then.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Their patents applications are dead anyway...
they abandoned the 20070028958 patent application in 2012 after many failed efforts.
the patent examiner who had rejected 123 out of 126 claims for the 20090133733 application just smacked the remaining 3 which are crappy anyway.
I dont want to pee on anyones parade...just saying....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TNO is more
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_Organisation_for_Applied_Scientific_Research
Among their divisions is one with quite useful applications against patent trolls: the black ops^h^h^h^h^h^h^h^h experimental military weapons division. They make some interesting guided missiles for potential anti-troll research.
http://www.tno.nl/downloads/munitions_and_guided_weapons1.pdf
/:D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ownership culture.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Solar road
Running steel rods through "black top" (or even concrete) highways and then concerting that heat into energy is trivial. Trivial that is, if it didn't require a bloated government contract to implement...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sad...
Personally, I ran into an interesting issue with another project I did. I presented it at a few other science fairs and submitted a paper to Intel STS. A few years later, I found that a research lab at a college was basically reworking my project. At first I wanted to do the American thing and sue them, then I realized that was stupid and I wrote to them, congratulating them on their success, and offered some input to help them. In the end, the project will help people and make the world a better place, I should not stand in the way of that nor should any one else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Addressing the matter at hand.
The author of this article seems intent on trying to make us look like terrible people. If the author knew about patents he would know that patent applications still warrant protection in the courts. Patent interference occurs when an individual claims to have invented a device that is covered under prior published patent applications. Under US law an individual who can prove first inventorship of a technology can file suit at any time to stop interference with the development and/or commercialization of the device. Also, the author does not understand the difference between a provisional and non provisional patent application. A provisional application establishes the date of first disclosure to the patent office. A non provisional application covering the same claims must be filed within a year of the provisional. When he refers to the 2006 application he apparently is ignorant of the fact that the first date of filing is the enforceable date of a patent application. Our first date of filing occurred in 2005 therefore the date of protection extends to 2005 not 2006. Further to this Retti is well within his rights to protest public domain disclosures of devices that he has already filed prior applications on. In closing, I would also like to state that having worked for Retti since 2007 I have observed on many occasions that Retti has acted in a prudent and acceptable manner regarding his activities in his elected industry. Retti has provided jobs and training for teenagers and young adults who were virtually unemployable. Retti has taken funds from his own pocket to help these young people stay in school and attend higher education. I know for a fact that Retti was paying the tuition and living expenses for at least a half dozen college students who had no means of attending college without his help. This article does a great disservice to Retti and Solaroad because of the obvious distortion of the facts given to the author of this article in a telephone conversation which he initiated with Retti. Perhaps people who do not know the extensive laws concerning patents should not comment on them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Solar road
Just for the sake of discussion, let's hypothetically remove the "bloated government" and all its contracts from the picture. In their absence, how would you trivially implement a system like this? You have one absolute constraint you are required to work under: no causing massive gridlock.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Some few things really were more awesome in the '50s.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Ah. Well, fuck you too. I guess there's no point in having a discussion that might lead to mutual understanding.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Independent Invention
Might be a silly question but I am trying to understand the American patent system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Isn't there some uniqueness clause in patents? Such that if someone else develops the same thing completely independently then it's not patentable?
Serious question looking for answers :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Or, in non-patent terms, please pick on somebody your own size.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Solar road
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ask any business owner in the tech business where the majority of their money is spent. It isn't R&D, it isn't payroll. It's protecting their IP. Good patent attorneys cost hundreds an hour.
Now, I might not completely understand the ins and outs of what both inventors have created but I understand the idea of protecting it.
And for everyone jumping on the hater bandwagon, how about YOU invent something, work on it for years, put your blood, sweat and tears into it and have someone else get credit (and funding) for it and see how you feel.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the reason that Solaroad's products aren't to market yet is due to funding. Or lack thereof. How about instead of being little internet wanna be tech trolls, you pony up and help them get their stuff to market.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
Look, what this girl did is nothing short of amazing. No one is saying that she 'stole' the idea. But this science fair project is getting a lot of attention and offers for funding while Mr. Retti seems to be struggling to get funding. Perhaps, if he got funded, he would offer her a job. She would be a valuable asset to his company. Hell, she'd be a valuable asset to any company and I'm sure she can write her own ticket at this point.
And I personally think it's unfair to accuse him of bullying when he's simply trying to protect what he sees is his idea. One that he filed for in the patent office.
I'm no attorney and not current on patent law but the right of first filing/first to invent would be clear here since Mr. Retti first filed in 2005. I don't think Mr. Retti wants to sue a high school student. I simply think he would like a little credit for his idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Further, even were the claims of that filing granted, the student's recited structure appears to be non-infringing.
And yes, I do cost hundreds an hour and it does bother me when someone with NO patent in hand (or their employees) petulantly threatens suit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Solar road
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Heck, there's now even a literal poster child for the cause.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ownership culture.
"Renting" real property has great value to both parties. I only need a paint sprayer once every few years, I would much rather pay a small portion of the purchase price to rent one for a few days.
Claiming ownership of words, sounds, images, and concepts, and attempting to control their use by others, has nothing to do with the concepts of real property ownership.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
They aren't really designed or intended to handle cases where people just come up with the same thing as you independantly (like this case) and where the details disclosed for the patent were not used. That kinda happened by accident as part of the brokenness of our system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Independent Invention
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If you read the comments posted by Mr. Retti and Mr. Cameron, all they requested was some recognition to go to Mr. Retti. It doesn't sound like Mr. Retti has any other objective than getting noticed for his idea. People like pats on the back. But the author of the article made both Mr. Retti and his company sound like they go around kicking puppies, something I seriously doubt they do.
My idea wasn't to get into patent and IP debates, it was simply to suggest that, instead, Mr. Retti gets some credit and his company some funding. Visit the company's website, check out their crowdfunding page (if it is still up) and kick in a few bucks. Help the guy get his stuff to market. If Google and Intel won't talk to him and help, maybe the everyday person can. I can't help it, I always root for the underdog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Threatening to sue people should be something that one takes seriously.
Anyone who threatens to sue the doers with patents so they can go back to not doing is trying to hold us all back and deserves no deserves no credit or funding and they certainly aren't the underdog when pitting their resources against those of a high school kid.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Independent Invention
Might be a silly question but I am trying to understand the American patent system.
Under the patent system, this doesn't matter.
It's stupid, but such is a huge problem with the patent system. There is no independent invention defense. It doesn't matter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Maybe you should have spent that time and effort focused on commercialization, rather than patenting.
And, as noted elsewhere, the patent applications have apparently been abandonded, so... ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What Facebook page?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I talk to tech businesses all the time and that's not even remotely close to true.
If it is true, what an incredible waste of resources, don't you think? Shouldn't the money be focused on developing and delivering good products?
And for everyone jumping on the hater bandwagon, how about YOU invent something, work on it for years, put your blood, sweat and tears into it and have someone else get credit (and funding) for it and see how you feel.
If I had such a big head start, and failed to commercialize the product, I'd think "that's capitalism" and tip my hat to the person who did it right where I failed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Do we live in the same U.S.? Because I hear people threaten to sue other people all the time. Hell, this is the country where people tried to sue McDonalds for making them fat. Remember that? I was driving and was lightly tapped from behind at a light and the woman was terrified that I was going to sue her. She drifted into me and I obviously didn't sue her, there wasn't any damage to either of our cars.
As far as being a doer with patents, Mr. Retti filed an application. The status of that, I'm not sure of. Nor is it my concern. Does Ms. Khare have patents? The author was rather unclear on that. But since Mr. Retti went to all the time, expense and trouble to file, wouldn't that make him a doer? I don't think Mr. Retti's intent was/is to hold anyone back. If you read Mr. Cameron's response, it seems that Mr. Retti helps those who are "unemployable". It sounds like he gives the people that everyone else passes over a chance. How many people and/or companies can say that? After being a stay-at-home mom for years, re-entering the workforce after many years wasn't easy and a boss like Mr. Retti would have made my life a heck of a lot easier. I was considered "unemployable" and passed over for countless jobs because I chose to stay home with my kids and had a substantial gap in my work history. I finally found an employer who was willing to take a chance on me, and it's been great ever since. For that, Mr. Retti gets kudos from me, if what Mr. Cameron says is true.
Ms. Khare is being courted by Intel and Google while Mr. Retti can't get them to talk to him. So tell me, who has the resources again? And after this article, Mr. Retti is most certainly the underdog.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://parkville.patch.com/articles/second-parkville-man-charged-in-connection-with -hazmat-incident
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
Holding an application is nowhere near as effective as holding an actual patent. While some royalties may be collected from infringement that occurred after the application was published, certain stipulations must be met before the original applicant can make a claim for damages. One of these requirements is that the infringer must have "actual notice" of the published patent. It's hard to imagine that most (if any) science fair projects begin with a patent search, so the noise Solaroad's making only serves one purpose: to inform the involved parties that a.) it exists, b.) it's willing to sue and c.) it's filed an application(s) that might tenuously be related to Khare's work. If she chooses to commercialize her supercapacitor work, Retti can claim she had "actual notice."
Sounds like he is quite willing to sue if the young lady makes or attempts to make any money as a result of her project.
Perhaps Retti should spend less time fretting about inventive 18-year-olds and start refining its existing product line. A visit to Solaroad's site gives you the feeling the products it's touting have endless upside, but digging around a little more leads to the impression that its main products exist only as PDFs and Powerpoint presentations.
One of the signs of a potential patent troll is holding patents (or in this case an application) and doing nothing with it. No product, no further development, just a miserably failed attempt to get funding.
While throwing around nearly baseless legal threats, Solaroad might want to be a bit more careful with its careless shouts of "infringement." One of its "future products" is SolarFilm
This bears quite a resemblance to SolaRoad, another solar-generation-via-roadway-application product developed by Dutch company TNO. This is due for a test run in 2013, with an eye towards replacing all 85,000+ km of the Netherlands' roads and bike paths with the combination solar panel/concrete hybrid.
There's likely no infringement occurring here (in either direction), but Retti and Solaroad have shown they're more than willing to take offense at independent invention. This does very little for whatever legal case it may try to pursue, but it does a great deal towards crafting some very negative "publicity."
More potential troll behavior by making false or inflated product or patent claims.
Sorry, but I don't see the CEO as someone being slighted by the science project winner or a lack of funding.
It still seems as if he is a greedy individual willing to bully and setup for a lawsuit against someone that independently came up with her research that surpasses an idea he had in the 1980s.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
While it looks like you still have a shot at Canada and Mexico, your 2007 publication is dead and your publication graciously ceded to the US public.
Your lack of understanding of the patent process is made clear with this useless, sub-Mandrake hand-waving gesture:
"Further to this Retti is well within his rights to protest public domain disclosures of devices that he has already filed prior applications on."
His "rights" to nondisclosure died 18 months after the priority date courtesy of the PCT filing, as prescribed by law. Publication is required and diligent prosecution is required to keep the filing alive.
Your blather does a grave disservice to your employer; many here are clearly better versed in patent law than you.
N.B.: Any attempt to revive the 11/498759 filing will be met with a gratis ex-parte opposition.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You mean try being a design engineer for a company 9 hours a day, 5 days a week like most middle class engineers who never see a patent or cut of the profits (okay maybe in the form of a $50-100 bonus for making something worth millions)?
Welcome to real life.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
You are terrible people, and you know it.
"obvious distortion of the facts"
Yep, that is exactly what your comment is attempting (and failing) to do.
"Perhaps people who do not know the extensive laws concerning patents should not comment on them."
Perhaps people who get called out for be complete asshats should not try to justify their actions by adding superfluous details on how great they think they are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Firstly, you should know that if Eesha Khare were to try to commercialize what she got the Intel Young Scientists Award for, the intellectual property would be assigned to the University of California, as she did her work under the tutelage and in the lab of Yat Li at UC Santa Cruz. You might have done a lot better by just sending a threatening letter to the UCSC Office For Management of Intellectual Property rather than give your company some bad publicity by resorting to petulant whining in the tech media. Do you seriously think that projects for the Intel Science and Engineer Fair should be vetted beforehand for possible patent infringement? The focus here is on science education. The $50,000 award that Eesha Khare received was for her education, not an investment into a, potentially infringing, product. Finally, Eesha khare may eventually start up or be involved with a company that looks to actually develop a real usable product based on supercapacitors. Then, and only then, should you threaten and sue if you really think your patent (if not abandoned) is being infringed upon. We look forward to that future court fight.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Here's a thought Mr. Retti
This girl has proven that she's bright, capable, and inventive. All great supposedly great qualities in an employee (or so they keep telling me out the employment applications).
Here's a brilliant idea Mr. Retti: instead of threatening legal action, how about you try to HIRE Miss Khare. Then your company might actually be able to start selling ACTUAL PRODUCTS (novel concept, that) instead of your employees sitting around with their thumbs up their asses.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
I'll just respond to your statements about the "great disservice" this post does to your company.
First off, your legal threats do a great disservice to your company. I think you realize that, which is why the FB posts have been vanished into the Google Cache cornfield.
Here's a link to your post on Solaroad's FB page that ends with "ITS A GOOD WAY TO GET SUED."
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jpARSrsZWL8J:https://www.facebook.com /Solaroad/posts/480250905377807+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Here's it preserved at Imgur, in case Google "forgets."
http://i.imgur.com/8VCDkCw.png
Now, everything stated by you or Retti is quoted directly. You're not disputing what was said, but you feel justified in acting this way, despite the fact that the patents you claim to be "protecting" have been abandoned. I can't make you look too much worse than you already do.
I'll be updating the post to add this screenshot since you've decided to protect your (abandoned) patent (applications) by deleting your Facebook rant.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Retti Sr should patent the idea of using starter fluid as an inhalant.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What they're saying..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ouch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sad...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What Facebook page?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
You (snuffcore) and Sandergrrrl have that "sock puppet" aspect we've all come to love.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ouch
Just admit she has more talent and is smarter than you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ownership culture.
What does value have to do with it? Absolutely nothing, because value is meaningless. What matters in real life is human needs and available resources. The problem is, property makes it possible to hold those resources for ransom and make people into slaves. Make no mistake about it, we all are slaves. If you have to trade your labor in exchange for the means to live, you are a slave. It's one thing to be at the mercy of nature for food and shelter, it's quite another to be at the mercy of property owners that want to exploit your needs for their own gains.
"Claiming ownership of words, sounds, images, and concepts, and attempting to control their use by others, has nothing to do with the concepts of real property ownership."
It has everything to do with it. It's the same insidious game. Own something, then keep everyone else from having it unless they labor to make someone else rich in order to get some symbolic units of labor to exchange for access to something you simply put borders around. It's a literal walled garden, but it's still just a border that is created in the mind of every person. People put these walls around resources that have been in existence since long before our first hominid ancestors were born and people think that they have the right to claim exclusive ownership over it.
There is one and only one exclusive form of property in this universe and that is our will to choose what we do. There is only one truly scarce resource, time. Everything else can be combined, transformed, and remixed without end. Matter is simply information and like information, it can be manipulated if you have the right tools. Just like the information age gave us the tools to create any content we wished, tools will one day exist to allow us to produce any material items we need by our own will.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I think it is obvious why they have not been able to get funding in 9 years since they lodged their patent application.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
And what issued patents do you hold?
Fwiw, the first sign of someone not knowing what they're talking about in a dispute over patents is the person who claims that you can't discuss patents if you don't have one. We're talking about the impact on innovation and the economy of patents here. By your reasoning, we should say that anyone with a patent is biased and their opinion is irrelevant. Or, that anyone without an economics degree is irrelevant. But that's idiotic. We assume that plenty of people may have valid input into the subject.
Oh, and, seriously, logging in from the same IP as the other angry commenter defending Solaroad... suggests you're being less than forthright about who you are. So, in the interest of being honest, what's your connection to Solaroad?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sad...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sad...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Sad...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
File histories can be downloaded via the uspto's public pair system.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Since the same law firm is:
- filing electronically
- actively prosecuting another patent for the same inventor
- apparently aware enough of the need for a delay to file and pay for an extension
this may be a hard row to hoe. At the very least, even if revived, RCE paid and prosecution results in issuance, the spectre of inequitable conduct (rarely seriously raised these days at trial) is a real threat. The PTO might take it poorly if, after 6 months of abandonment and this horrific PR nightmare is played out in public, such a revival petition is filed.
The "unintentional" argument would be a load of bollocks and, with unpleasant public exposure in place, the PTO may understandably reject a petition to revive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
But this story and the comments have taught me a great deal. So thanks for that. I've lost yet more faith in people, and I honestly didn't think that was possible.
I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt. If Mr. Retti said that he invented it first, I'll go with that. He has the proof of an application at the patent office, abandoned or not. I honestly think, and I will not waiver from this opinion, that all he wanted was a little recognition for his work. A little recognition goes a long way. Funny, I just did a patent search for Eesha Khare and what do you know, not a thing. But I'm sure the big money behind Google and Intel will change that. Sure, her college is paid for and that's awesome. But don't tell me she isn't going to have companies fighting over her when she gets out. And she deserves to.
There has been no suit filed so you guys are spewing hate at a guy who actually invented something and, by all accounts, has spent his time, money and life trying to do something with that. So I ask YOU, what have you done?? And you want to talk greater good? Watch the videos posted on their (solaroad's) FB page, the Gridkicker is a pretty cool idea. How many news stories do you see on a semi-regular basis about people who put their gas generators in their homes and end up killing their entire families? Saving just one family would be the greater good in my book and if the Gridkicker could do that well... And let's not even get into how helpful a Gridkicker would've been after Hurricane Sandy last year. Oh how quickly we in the US forget.
I think it's great that Ms. Khare has a bright future ahead of her. And I hold out hope that she will do great things.
Me? I'm content to work my not-so-great job, hang out with my kids, do little secret acts of kindness and try to be the best person I can be. I don't invent things, my brain isn't wired for such things. But every so often, I have an glimpse of what it must be like.
So, hate me all you want. I'll almost always stick up for the one being attacked. And this article was nothing but an attack on Mr. Retti and his company. I clicked on it because I read about her winning the science fair, thought it was awesome (my oldest is a bit of a nerd, and proud of it and I used Ms. Khare as a real example of what she can strive for) and wondered what this was all about. Not that any of you care about that but when you attack ME and call me a sock puppet? Mr. Cameron is right, to hell with you. I won't be back on here, I'm going to interact with actual people and do stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Facebook Page
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
But let me ask you, do you know or want an inventor who ISN'T passionate about his inventions? I don't know Ms. Khare, but I would be curious as to her thoughts on all of this. Would she want people attacking Mr. Retti? THAT is an article I would be interested in reading.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Solar road
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
And so you are saying as long as children are bright and media popular, it's ok for them to do whatever they want with no consequences? Wow, that's a whole generation of Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Bynes' just waiting to happen. Sorry for the sarcasm, but as a parent, that doesn't fly with me. My kids know that there are consequences to their actions. No excuses, no exceptions. They get in trouble, I will help them how I can, but they are going to face the music, so to speak.
As far as Intel is concerned, again, the writer is on the hook for this one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
"I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt. If Mr. Retti said that he invented it first, I'll go with that."
I have not argued this point. Mr. Cameron (I believe) stated that documentary evidence from 1988 exists for Mr. Retti's work. At the very least, he filed his patents on the relevant subject matter starting in 2005. Again no dispute, so you win no points here.
"...all he wanted was a little recognition for his work." No, no, no. From his quoted comment on NetworkWorld:
'I dont want to have to bring legal action against her,' he added. 'But if she raises capital, Ill have to stop her. That is substantially different from "recognition."
The fact that Ms. Khare does or does not have patents (in this arena or others) is immaterial.
I do not heap scorn (or hatred) on anyone who asserts a valid property right. There is nothing here but empty threats and bluster and this gives me great psychic dyspepsia.
I have not accorded you LambChop status; that appears to be the posting of another who appears less interested in the substance of the issue. Your representation of "support for the underdog" naming Mr. Retti seems misguided in the "corporate adult threatening a child" scenario. I can't read this any other way, given a baseless threat over an improper assertion of rights that have given up, by no action or inaction on the part of the student involved.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
When there was no power at our office because of the hurricane, our technology allowed us to go to work. When power went out in Kahrl's neighborhood, he is the one to help everyone out.
So many people have came into our office, lied, cheated, and then sued Kahrl because he didn't let step all over him and take his technology.
If any of you have questions or don't believe I am real, here is my facebook: https://www.facebook.com/timofeyk?ref=tn_tnmn
You all sound like some very grown, wise, "keyobard warriors"
If you would want to actually talk to someone on the inside of the company, please contact me. I bet none of you have even tried to help another person other than yourselves.
Please think about your actions, and what kind of battle you all are trying to fight. Bringing up past mistakes, and just in general hating. We are all in this world together, so we should all seek the very best for our future.
Kahrl has obviously been thinking about that for a long time, how to improve the world we live in. I do not see any of you commentors teaching me how to solder, wire, sand, paint, use a milling machine, and create something to be proud of. I don't see you putting me to work and giving me a better chance at a job, and a higher wage, rather than starting at a dead end teenage job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
When there was no power at our office because of the hurricane, our technology allowed us to go to work. When power went out in Kahrl's neighborhood, he is the one to help everyone out.
So many people have came into our office, lied, cheated, and then sued Kahrl because he didn't let step all over him and take his technology.
If any of you have questions or don't believe I am real, here is my facebook: https://www.facebook.com/timofeyk?ref=tn_tnmn
You all sound like some very grown, wise, "keyobard warriors"
If you would want to actually talk to someone on the inside of the company, please contact me. I bet none of you have even tried to help another person other than yourselves.
Please think about your actions, and what kind of battle you all are trying to fight. Bringing up past mistakes, and just in general hating. We are all in this world together, so we should all seek the very best for our future.
Kahrl has obviously been thinking about that for a long time, how to improve the world we live in. I do not see any of you commentors teaching me how to solder, wire, sand, paint, use a milling machine, and create something to be proud of. I don't see you putting me to work and giving me a better chance at a job, and a higher wage, rather than starting at a dead end teenage job.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
And by all accounts, Ms. Khare is an adult. She is 18, she's not a child. I will agree his statements were poorly chosen. It will be interesting to see what comes next.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ouch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
Do you know Ms. Khare personally? Then what you are saying is nothing more than opinionated conjecture, isn't it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
Well, thanks and f*** you right back.
I won't be back on here
But you are, isn't that surprising?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Well thanks, and f*** you right back, losers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Except of course when a teenager does an independent invention in your field that you somehow feel entitled too, eh?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So what? I wasn't aware we were in any way responsible for your education.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
Were I to indulge in speculation, I would predict this event is professional seppuku for Mr. Retti and his business interests. This will also (I predict) leave in indelible mark on Ms. Khare, and not a good or welcome one at that. For at least that reason, I am saddened. What was and is a technological triumph has been tainted by the bald face of covetousness flavoured with falsehood (or, at best, ignorance).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Addressing the matter at hand.
Hello, this is Nick Cameron from Solaroad Technologies. This article was written in a terribly wrong light. Solaroad Technologies encourages innovation in the science world. The fact that the author of this article is intentionally trying to give us a black eye by saying we were bullying this girl is absurd. The employees of Solaroad and Retti et al have witnessed firsthand the blood, sweat, and tears that have gone into trying to bring our products to commercialization. We have literally spent hundreds of thousands of dollars filing our intellectual properties, and we are simply trying to protect ourselves, as well as our investors from people viewing the patent work, and picking off pieces of it. Perhaps this young lady did come up with this herself and congratulations to her if that is the case, that is very high level science for a young person. The issue is the fact that as a company and as individuals we have continually made sacrifices to maintain our intellectual property. Retti has dedicated his life to this work, and the fact that he is trying to protect his life's work is commendable in my book. Don't think for a second that if General Electric had patented this and the same article came out about this young lady that there would not be legal action taken. We have everything on the line here, and we have to protect what is ours. To those people who don't like it, to hell with you. We will continue to take a stand against people that we believe are infringing on our intellectual property. Whether they are young or old, companies, or individuals, the patent office should be checked before announcements are made about "new groundbreaking technologies" when they are in existence and have been.
The author of this article seems intent on trying to make us look like terrible people. If the author knew about patents he would know that patent applications still warrant protection in the courts. Patent interference occurs when an individual claims to have invented a device that is covered under prior published patent applications. Under US law an individual who can prove first inventorship of a technology can file suit at any time to stop interference with the development and/or commercialization of the device. Also, the author does not understand the difference between a provisional and non provisional patent application. A provisional application establishes the date of first disclosure to the patent office. A non provisional application covering the same claims must be filed within a year of the provisional. When he refers to the 2006 application he apparently is ignorant of the fact that the first date of filing is the enforceable date of a patent application. Our first date of filing occurred in 2005 therefore the date of protection extends to 2005 not 2006. Further to this Retti is well within his rights to protest public domain disclosures of devices that he has already filed prior applications on. In closing, I would also like to state that having worked for Retti since 2007 I have observed on many occasions that Retti has acted in a prudent and acceptable manner regarding his activities in his elected industry. Retti has provided jobs and training for teenagers and young adults who were virtually unemployable. Retti has taken funds from his own pocket to help these young people stay in school and attend higher education. I know for a fact that Retti was paying the tuition and living expenses for at least a half dozen college students who had no means of attending college without his help. This article does a great disservice to Retti and Solaroad because of the obvious distortion of the facts given to the author of this article in a telephone conversation which he initiated with Retti. Perhaps people who do not know the extensive laws concerning patents should not comment on them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
I call bullshit on that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
This is why I love this site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
Perhaps.
Could you clarify that statement?
Do you or do you not believe that Eesha Khare knowingly stole unmarketed prototypes from solaroad or directly copied data from public filings, produced a prototype, testing, background material and results to meet the standards of the Intel ISEF and then lied repeatedly and continually to judges, interviewers and assorted press concerns?
simple question, should have a simple answer right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm kinda amused that this guy has all these people "defending him." I think it's basically just his staff or him making things up because he knows he lost. They all write the same which leads me to believe that they are all the same person. And the members of the company keep getting into it with people on this article. It's just really crappy PR. They should seriously abandon that tactic.
I'll reiterate. Retti is it? If Retti had something that was workable, a.) he'd already have a patent. Further, b.) he'd get that funding from Intel and Google. He's been working on it for 20 approximate years? Then he should have something to show for it by now. Business 101. If you can't get funding, then the way it is described in the patent ISN'T a good idea, period. It either doesn't work as expected, or it isn't economical to produce or both. Places like Google and Intel don't just ignore your work for no reason. They attract and have some of the finest minds in the industry. If there is something to be gained from your work when you pitch it to them, then you are going to get that funding. If you don't get the funding then you need to go back to the drawing board because there is a serious FLAW in your idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Also there was not this tremendous fear of getting hurt, people experimented a lot, is like the nation is paralyzed by fear these days.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Here's a thought Mr. Retti
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Ownership culture.
Slavery is where you are property. You have no choices. Obedience or death. As property your owner can do anything they want with you, including selling you, disposing of you(terminating your existence), damaging you (torturing you), etc.
Just because there are greedy people who want to take advantage of you, doesn't mean that you are a slave. You can always sell you labour to someone else or live somewhere else, or do something else. You have a choice.
You either work or you don't work. Your choice. You can accumulate or not accumulate again your choice.
Ownership of things has been around for a long time. Where it gets prickly is when we start allowing as a normal course of events the ownership of ideas. Ephemeral things do not have a substance that restricts but expands.
Finally, you seem to be of the mindset that someone owes you a living. I hope that I have misunderstood your perspective here and that you are a person who willingly supports his family.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ouch
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Seriously, that didn't work for CBS, and it won't work for you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nick Cameron from Solaroad Technologies
The author of the article has no need to try and give Solaroad a black eye. It appears both the CEO's own words and yours did that all by themselves.
The author of this article seems intent on trying to make us look like terrible people.
Again, your own words make you seem like terrible people.
I would also like to state that having worked for Retti since 2007 I have observed on many occasions that Retti has acted in a prudent and acceptable manner regarding his activities in his elected industry.
If by his "elected industry" you mean looking like a patent troll, then I agree with you.
We have everything on the line here, and we have to protect what is ours. To those people who don't like it, to hell with you.
It seems you and others of your company have a problem with impulse control.
I would suggest your company's officers (and spokesperson) should invest some time in learning how to reach out to people without insulting them for not seeing things the way you think they should.
Perhaps this problem is why your company's "idea" has languished for so many years due to a lack of funding?
I know for a fact that Retti was paying the tuition and living expenses for at least a half dozen college students who had no means of attending college without his help.
From the article:
While throwing around nearly baseless legal threats, Solaroad might want to be a bit more careful with its careless shouts of "infringement." One of its "future products" is SolarFilm:
SolarFilm is a sprayable nano-based solar technology that creates energy by using heat, light, and magnetics. It's unique formulation of photovoltaic (PV) and thermionic chemical compositions make it one of the most advanced solar technologies ever created. SolarFilm is durable, efficient, and extremely versatile. It can be easily applied to a variety of surfaces, such as roadways, shingles, siding, vehicle paints and much more.
This bears quite a resemblance to SolaRoad, another solar-generation-via-roadway-application product developed by Dutch company TNO.
It looks as if your company plays fast and loose with the truth. Why should anyone believe anything you say?
Perhaps people who do not know the extensive laws concerning patents should not comment on them.
First Amendment in the Constitution (free speech in case you are unfamiliar with it) says we are as free to speculate
about patents and your company's motivation in bullying a student as you are free to continue spewing your apparent nonsensical responses.
In closing I would refer you to the "Streisand Effect", which I suspect is beginning to envelop your company. You and the CEO should really stop digging now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The 'discoverer' is usually some one who put the final piece of the puzzle in place. When they claim a patent they are claiming the rewards for themselves, where in practice many more people contributed to the discovery.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Independent Invention
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
PS.
I am the person you are attacking, but my IP address has probably changed giving a different snowflake.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
If this is the attitude you take with kids I fear for your children, I really do. Why not do what the Greeks did and leave your child for the wolves to see if it's worth keeping alive?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Take a moment to think about what you've written.
Are you seriously saying that Ms. Khare who separately did her own research before being noticed by Intel is the one with the most resources and richest backers?
And you wonder why no one here is taking you seriously.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Independent Invention
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Corporations and the people they are made of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Ownership culture.
When a privileged minority controls all of the resources and the means to production we need to live, you are property. The only choice you have is which owner you work for. They own your labor because they have the power to keep you from accessing those resources if you refuse to participate in their system. The only other option for those that want to be free, is to live in the wild.
Slavery isn't strictly defined as violent control over another person. Deceit and misdirection can just as easily enslave a person. When you are forced by violent means to labor for another, you know you are enslaved. But when you are born into a system where you must labor for the means to live and are exploited by the owners through debt, fear, and ignorance, you are just as enslaved as if they slapped shackles on your wrists. The only difference is, that you don't see your cage. You don't see your master putting the boot down on you.
Capitalism is a form of slavery just as feudalism was slavery. The kings (owners of the land and means of production) have vassals (CEO's) that are stewards of the king's property and they use lords (managers) to coordinate the serfs (wager earners) who trade their labor to enrich everyone up the chain for the meager means to live. The serfs could not rise above their station and this lead people to seeing such a system as nothing more than slavery.
Today, capitalism operates on same principles, expect for one difference. The serfs can rise to higher economic status, but everything else stays the same. The king still owns the land and means to production and you still work for managers and CEO's that exploit your labor to make them and their bosses rich. People are falsely lead to believe they are free because of that little idea that they can rise from a serf to a king. However, this almost never happens and it certainly can't happen for everyone. If everyone was king, nobody would be. So they replaced socioeconomic destiny with a battle to be the next king. Keep the people distracted with fighting each other over who gets to be king and nobody notices that they are being used as chattel to keep the current kings in the lap of luxury.
I don't believe anyone owes me a living. I'm not advocating that others should give their labor up so that I don't have to, that would be contradictory to my goals. No, what I want is people to be self-reliant and have access to the means of production so that they can provide for themselves the goods they require to live. They should have the freedom to work because they choose to and not because of a mortgage, loans, and bills are compelling them to do so. We are a very technologically advanced society and we could devise a way for people to produce their own goods with very little time and labor put in (automation).
This is good because right now, a lot of human potential is wasted on daily toil to maintain the minimum of existence. When people are applying the majority of their labor to food and shelter, they can't invest it into the science, technology, art, philosophy, academia, and exploration. In other words, they can't participate in the advancement of humanity because they're too busy trying to stay fed and sheltered. This is the 21st century, we shouldn't still be struggling to feed and cloth ourselves. We should be free to pursue higher goals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
This latest filing (the 11/498,759 ) may have been filed with a non-publication, which would explain the lack of PAIR data on line.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
This is absolutely true. In many cases, external funding is unnecessary, although it does make things more comfortable and convenient. In many other cases, it's actively damaging to innovation: if money is lubricant, applying too much just makes things gooey, sticky, and more painful. It sounds counterintuitive, but it's true.
One thing that is often done wrong is to put a dollar sign on everything and say "I need this much to start". For example, no business needs money itself. It needs things and services -- and often those things and services can be had at no cost as a form of investment by the providers. It's pretty common, for example, for printers to do print jobs for business on terms or even in exchange for direct investment in the form of stock.
So, list your needs, see what you can do without (be ruthless), see what you can get "donated" from suppliers, arrange the timing of your roll-out to spread costs across a larger period of time, and you might be surprised how little cash you end up needing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Solar road
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
'We can't figure out how to make this work or present it in a manner that people want to buy it, but we'll be damned if anyone else gets a crack at trying!'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
software patents in USA (sic)
The fate of this creative 18 year old in California is there symptomatic of a future when draconian and greedy US companies will completely discourage any technology creativity, even that based on non-patented concepts (sic) and places like China, India, Brazil and even arch enemies like Iran will surpass the USA in imaginativeness and productivity with technology.
However I would suspect that the patent hoards here will even try crush and or gain control of virgin software technology innovation invented in the rest of the world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Addressing the matter at hand.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Their patents applications are dead anyway...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
"M. Sullivan
11:05 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Looks like he was trying to sniff up his whole supply! Or, is he just a member of the Addams family?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
From the South Park kids: "I think we learned something here today."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Any connection to IV?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Solar road
Indeed in urban areas most road alterations seem to be aimed specifically at slowing, disrupting or discouraging traffic from it's already stately crawl and often perfectly fine roads are dug up to accomplish this. We might at least get some power generation while they're at it...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Retti's 13/673595 filing is at final rejection and the examiner is treating this one like an angry bulldog with a shoe. They're already past the statutory 3 month response period; in ca. 1.5 months this filing is toast as well.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gov.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
2.5 28KW cap
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Yup! Seriously lame
Maybe they should try to figure out to whom you refer before you open mouth and take another bite of your shoe!
She should sue them for harassement and screwing up her well-deserved award!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Khare
Easha is a child from my relative but when she used my ideas And publications in time correction, energy correction , and momentum Plus a later scribd post of new methods in time correction She won a prize and a scholarship and earnings. When I left her a comment on FB she did not reply on home come she did not tell about me and my work and possible share of the money?
TY,
Manoj Agravat
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Khare
I have a lawyer Brad Culpepper. These are three of my works then before the patent was made they looked at.
Manoj Bansidas Agravat MPH"Time Correction, Energy and Momentum "Science Journal of Physics, Volume 2012, Article ID sjp-111, 13 Pages, 2012. doi: 10.7237/sjp/111 http://www.sjpub.org/sjp/sjp-111.pdf
[ link to this | view in thread ]