Feds Seeking To Silence The Media Over Barrett Brown, After They Locked Him Up For Posting A Link
from the prosecutorial-overreach dept
We've covered the immensely troubling case against Barrett Brown a few times here. Brown is the journalist and activist who was arrested on a series of highly questionable charges, mostly focused on taking the astounding step of copying a URL pointing to a bunch of Stratfor emails that people in Anonymous had hacked, and placing it in a chat room that Brown managed, to try to crowdsource information about intelligence community contractors, known as Project PM. No one has accused Brown of being responsible for the hack -- but rather just posting the link to the hacked contents, which the feds are claiming is a federal crime, in part because the data it pointed to contained credit card info. There are two other charges, including concealing evidence (he put his laptop in his mother's dish cabinet) and "threatening a federal agent" based on a rambling video he had posted to YouTube, which was probably inappropriate, but was in response to being constantly harassed and threatened himself for merely reporting on the various information that had been leaked. Glenn Greenwald's summary from earlier this year is well worth reading.The incredible thing is that the linking to leaked materials, including those that reveal hacked documents and things like passwords is fairly common. As the EFF pointed out a few weeks back, if what Brown did with the link to Stratfor emails was a crime then plenty of other publications are guilty of the same thing, including The Daily Beast and Buzzfeed, who both posted links to what some claimed were passwords for email accounts of Congressional staffers.
Even more ridiculous, however, is that the government is seeking to silence the media from reporting on the case, claiming, ridiculously that press coverage related to the case is something it can blame on Brown himself because various publications are reporting on the ridiculous details of his arrest and the charges against him.
Today, there is the latest hearing in his case, in which the US government is asking the court to issue a gag order barring both Brown and his lawyer from "making any statement to members of any television, radio, newspaper, magazine, Internet (including, but not limited to, bloggers), or other media organization about this case, other than matters of public record."
Think about this for a second. Not only is the main charge against him for the "crime" of copying a URL from one place on the internet to another, but now the government is actively seeking to silence the media coverage about this case.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: barrett brown, free speech, journalism, links
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not that I agree, but "Brown and his lawyer" are not "The Media".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Brown's choice of linking to hacked credit card info may've been unethical, but when the banksters defrauded the public and cheated the system, instead of punishing them, the government handed them a multi-billion dollar bailout at the taxpayers' expense.
Priorities...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not that I agree, but "Brown and his lawyer" are not "The Media".
Ok, Blue. Fair enough. Put your money where your mouth is then.
Tell us what your definition of "The Media" is, please. Doesn't a blogger doing journalism classify? Is it only mainstream media? Only print media. What? Do tell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
/sarcmarc
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Although if ootb were to, I'd applaud...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not that I agree, but "Brown and his lawyer" are not "The Media".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Folks are definitely going into information dissemination control overload. 100 years.. he's facing a century in jail, for a link.?
Copyrights, National Security and Media Capture
Isn't there a substantial amount of criminal activity that should receive this level of dedication and attention for things that, you know, actually hurt people?
I get the sense that this form of government, in its current incantation (yes, majik), is in its death throes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wtf
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Media
This is a very interesting statement. When the government want to decide if a person is a journalist, they include internet (including but not limited to bloggers) as media when it suits them, but say "you are only a journalist if you get a paycheck" other times.
If the government keeps speaking out of both sides of their mouth, it's going to choke.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:Putin
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Media
Better have some extra food on hand when that happens; supermarkets' shelves empty out pretty quick when the trucks stop rolling.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
BUT...
[ link to this | view in thread ]