9-Year-Old Sneaks Onto Flight; TSA Blames The Government Shutdown, Then Says It Did Its Job Just Fine
from the because-you-gotta-blame-someone dept
You may have seen this story making the rounds about a 9-year-old boy somehow getting through multiple layers of security at an airport in Minnesota to get aboard a flight to Las Vegas. It appears that there were multiple lapses here. The kid got through the TSA security checkpoint without a ticket. He got onto the plane without a ticket. The plane then took off without anyone noticing that (1) the plane had too many passengers and (2) he wasn't on their list of unaccompanied minors (something they noticed mid-flight). The TSA's response was initially to blame the the government shutdown:WCCO contacted the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) Sunday morning, during which a spokesperson said staffing is currently low due to the number of employees furloughed in the wake of the federal government shutdown.A few hours later, the TSA responded again, trying a different strategy. Apparently someone realized that nearly all TSA agents at security checks are still on the job, even if their pay is deferred. So, with a second shot at this, rather than blame the government shutdown, the TSA's strategy is to claim it did everything it was supposed to:
“The child was screened along with all other passengers to ensure that he was not a threat to the aircraft,” said the TSA spokesperson.Someone else in the article also notes that the TSA's job is to make sure that the people passing through security are "not a threat," and not whether or not they're supposed to board the plane. That's an interesting argument, but doesn't make much sense. I fly fairly frequently, and these days every single time I fly there are two TSA agents who review the boarding pass before you make it through security (one as you enter security who mainly makes sure you have a boarding pass for a flight through that security checkpoint, and the second who checks your IDs and is supposed to verify that the boarding pass is legit).
Of course, these kinds of lapses aren't unheard of. In the past it used to be much easier. Comedian/actor Molly Shannon has told her story a few times about how when she was a little girl she was able to sneak onto a plane to NY (after her father suggested she try it). But that was back when airport/airline security was a lot lower. Either way, it's pretty ridiculous for the TSA to blame the government shutdown for such a lapse. People have long argued that the TSA is more "security theater" than anything else -- giving you the appearance of security, rather than any actual protections -- and this seems to support that theory.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: flights, government shutdown, kids, security theater, stowaways, tsa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Really? I've never seen that. Boarding passes required at two points at every airport I've been to for years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SeaTac
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: SeaTac
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That being said, if the TSA's are not paying attention to how many kids are traveling in a family where they are as young as this guy, slipping wouldn't be that hard, nor getting through boarding as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Boarding pass is needed to get into departure lounge. Hence past security. Also onto the plane.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I've never tried to get by without showing the kids' boarding passes, but the TSA agent definitely checks them out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
How long has it been since you've flown AC?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OMG! Midget terrorists!
I forget, does TSA stand for
Totally Silly Agency
Technological Sexual Abuse
Thousands Standing Around, or
Theatre Security, Airlines?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! Midget terrorists!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have not flown in over ten years, but those I know who fly regularly say it's like a circus act with an almost comically offensive intrusion of privacy getting to your flight, in the name of..oh hell, who knows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
USA Today's Headline:
"Senate panel uncovers millions in disability fraud"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the Shutdown really were to blame the TSA just put us in danger by saying that
So once again, the TSA actually makes us LESS safe rather than more safe.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If the Shutdown really were to blame the TSA just put us in danger by saying that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: If the Shutdown really were to blame the TSA just put us in danger by saying that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The children!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can't believe I'm defending the TSA, but...
The first excuse, about the shutdown, is an obvious lie, but the second part actually makes sense. Checking boarding passes prevents people from flying without paying or swapping tickets (so the airlines like it), and allows the government to track everyone's movements ('nuff said), but it does nothing for actual security.
Wouldn't it be great if this started a movement to eliminate the ID/pass requirement?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
its
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I actually think this is mainly the airline's bad.
Nonetheless, I would think that someone trying to board a plane without a ticket should set off a red flag for an organization tasked with protecting airplanes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Payroll deferred? WTH?
Someone who knows this stuff for sure tell me pls (and tell me how you know it): Is this what's happening with everyone ELSE who's on the Fed payroll and still working during this "shutdown"? That they'll all be paid what they're owed ... Eventually?
If so, can someone also explain to me, pls, WTH is the purpose of a government "shudown"?
I hereby STG that I am not trolling with either of these questions ... I really think I must be missing something vital here ... Else my head will explode.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Payroll deferred? WTH?
My understanding from NPR news is that that's what happened last time, but there is no guarantee it will happen again since it's up to Congress.
If so, can someone also explain to me, pls, WTH is the purpose of a government "shudown"?
Political theater I think.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Payroll deferred? WTH?
That the government is saving money by not having people come to work, even if they're still getting paid, proves that many government workers aren't just a waste of a paycheque, but also while they're working they waste a lot of other tax dollars on top of their paycheque.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Payroll deferred? WTH?
Previous government shutdowns have ended up costing quite a bit of money, not saving it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The TSA's justification for failing are often truth
It's been repeatedly demonstrated that TSA security misses over 80% of weapons in 'red team' tests. In some cases it was 100%. And there are many, many other routes to get things into the secure area. The only conclusion we can draw is that there are not terrorists attempting to bring down planes.
Just try getting through the screening without a ticket. It's absolutely against the rules. You'll be treated like criminal for even attempting it. But if they miss checking for a ticket, it's suddenly not a problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Un-beeleevu-bull Tail
P.S. Atlanta does the double check. First guy verifies you HAVE a boarding pass before admitting you to the "search area." Second, later one checks pass against ID.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hate to say it, but it's the fault of the airline for not checking to see if the 9 year old had a valid ticket to be on that flight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Why?
Seriously, why? What does it have to do with preventing mass murder? In what scenario is a person with the means to commit a major act of mayhem on board a plane unable to acquire a valid pass?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Also, please remember that getting on the plane is not the only possible target in an airport.
And what they are looking for is that the ticket is 'valid', in that it is for the right day, the right area of the airport, for the person identified, ect. Not that the ticket is for a specific flight. Their is burden on the airline that the kid got on, but there is burden on the TSA as to how he made it to the 'secure area'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
There's no such thing as an impulsive terrorist attack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consider the personnel involved
So of COURSE they were easily outwitted by a 9-year-old: they were probably busy groping some woman's boobs or stealing all the electronics out of somebody's suitcase.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It could be they had to call a PA flack in to answer the question, because very few people at TSA are actually allowed to speak to the media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Security Theatre"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Security Theatre"
It caters to those whose primary drive is fear.
There's a lot of that in the states and the more fearful they are the more they want the security theater no matter how ineffective it actually is. It's like getting mommy or daddy to check the closet for monsters for you.
But in this case, it's mommy and daddy who tell you there are monsters and that those monsters could well be in the closet and that if you don't behave they'll gobble you up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not TSA's job
There job is to look for and identify possible threats.
I hope you don't expect the Government to be paying people to issue tickets, and serve drinks on the plane !
TSA are looking for possible threats, a 9 year old boy probably fell below the threshold.
Now if it had of been a man in his 20's of Middle Eastern appearance, then you have a stody.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not TSA's job
"Passengers should present the following documents to a Transportation Security Officer at the checkpoint:
Boarding pass
Identification"
So they are dealing with boarding because only people with a boarding pass are supposed be allowed through security and only those people who make it through security are supposed to be allowed in the secure area.
"TSA are looking for possible threats, a 9 year old boy probably fell below the threshold."
Then explain the various kids and their families that are pulled out for additional inspection because the name of their 9-year old child matches the name of a middle-aged man on the no-fly list?
The TSA has no idea who they are looking for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not TSA's job
looks like you already did explain it! plus we are talking about THIS case, not some other case. This kid was on no no fly list, but he also was not on the 'fly list' either.
Why on earth do you feel that ANY system should be PERFECT ? Is that not a bit unrealistic, how many people travel by air in the US every day ?
Out of that large number how many times have these kinds of things happened ?
Do you expect perfection all the time, the only thing that is perfect is something that does not do anything.
A stopped clock is right twice a day, but at the end of the day, mistakes will be made if you do anything!
Yes, that includes trying to screen the thousands of people travelling by air each day.
Are you trying to say, you should just do nothing, because when you do something sometimes mistakes happen, sometimes even intentional abuse happens. So you can give up and start knitting or keep on trying, and trying to improve.
But pointing out every single, trivial error from an organisation only shows they are trying, and they are human. We already worked that out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not TSA's job
I agree with you its not perfect and we shouldn't judge...but wide-spread reports of corruption when combined with the failure of the TSA to respond to critizems of ineffective measures and examples of the ineffectiveness of those measures paints a larger picture of lots of money and time being spent doing very little.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not TSA's job
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Not TSA's job
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not TSA's job
Yes, but that has nothing to do with the TSA, so don't bother bringing it up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just what do you all think the TSA is going to do in order to prevent this from happening in the future? Whatever it is, I assure you it's not going to make our experience at airports any smoother, safer, or more pleasant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Life imitates art.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TSA dodging the TRUTH
TSA is supposed to make certain the ADULT is supervising every child screening.
TSA is LYING ................. LIKE ALWAYS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not a "threat"....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]