Japan Likely To Pass New Secrecy Law That Would Put Whistleblowers And Journalists In Jail
from the exactly-wrong dept
One of the many worrying aspects of the Snowden saga is an attempt in the US to reframe whistleblowing as treason, and to make it harder for people to reveal information to journalists or the public that might embarrass the government there. However, things are even worse in other parts of the world. In Japan, for example, there are plans to bring in a new secrecy law that will make whistleblowing even more risky, as Reuters reports:
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's government is planning a state secrets act that critics say could curtail public access to information on a wide range of issues, including tensions with China and the Fukushima nuclear crisis.
The law has multiple problems:
The new law would dramatically expand the definition of official secrets and journalists convicted under it could be jailed for up to five years.Legal and media experts say the law, which would impose harsh penalties on those who leak secrets or try to obtain them, is too broad and vague, making it impossible to predict what would come under its umbrella. The lack of an independent review process leaves wide latitude for abuse, they say.
Given that the political bloc supporting Abe has a comfortable majority in both houses of the Japanese parliament, it seems likely that the new gagging law will be passed without much problem. That's especially retrogressive as the beneficial effect Snowden's leaks have had becomes clearer by the day, especially in terms of starting a global debate about key areas like surveillance, privacy, and government accountability.
"Basically, this bill raises the possibility that the kind of information about which the public should be informed is kept secret eternally," Tadaaki Muto, a lawyer and member of a task force on the bill at the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, told Reuters.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, japan, journalism, whistleblowers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Corrupt politicians have hidden behind the ‘National Security’ farce before
If you have the media on your side this is an effective tool. If not and you're morally corrupt then start practicing the phrase: I am not a crook.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chernobyl 2.0 here we come.
Those anti-piracy laws didn't stop all that J-Pop and anime from being uploaded all over the place. This law isn't going to stop people from getting the truth out there either.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Also the cultural aspect falls into place, you don't shame people more important than you, you respect at all costs the hierarchy, those who do are ostracized.
Which is bad since Japan is in great need of innovation. Japan is the worst place to do business or to be an entrepreneur, they lack the flexibility and their veiled xenophobia is always there even in the simple things, albeit very subtle most of the time.
Even unflattering news can get you a rough ride in Japan.
The Economist:
Japan's immigration control Gulag for gaijin
Amnesty International: Japan: Welcome to Japan?
Wikipedia: Human Rights in Japan
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's a feature, not a bug
Yeah, I'm betting the vague wording is entirely intentional, as it allows them to silence far more speech than it first appears or that they'd ever be able to justify.
If they openly said 'publishing anything that makes the government looks bad will land you in jail', that probably wouldn't go over well, but if they just imply it, without ever coming out and saying so, I imagine they think they'll be able to slip it through without too much challenge.
Also of note, when a government starts cracking down on whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers, it's a pretty solid indication that they've been doing, or plan on doing, something they very much want to keep hidden, so the question is, what is the government of Japan so desperate to keep under the rug?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A dictatorship only works if the people don't know what you're up to.
All hail General Alexander for f**ing up the remaining surviving democracies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe do a little cannibalistic genociding with some BBQ Sauce. Take over Russia and China then go make friends with North Korea and give them Japan just for the lulz.
/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Leakers are finally figuring this out. When someone leaked information to Al-Jazeera about an FBI investigation into corruption in the state legislature in California, they knew what they were doing. Since Al-Jazeera is in Qater, it is only subject to QATARI law. Therefore Al-Jazeera, and its reporters, are NOT SUBJECT to any U.S. laws, on that matter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Chernobyl 2.0 here we come.
Hell, from what I've seen based on my observations on the H-game crowd, the only thing that law did was cause pirates to wait longer before uploading stuff into the wild by about 2 weeks to a month.
All the Japanese government has done is just caused piracy to slightly delay its unofficial release schedule, and that's just on the file-sharing sites.
No idea how it's affected the torrent uploads though...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
9/11 whistleblower has book out
A new book on 9/11 is out.
Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing a book on what happened during 9/11. The book is now available. Download links:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0pdmokX9s8
Or read at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/170266922/9-11thology-The-third-truth-about-9-11-or-Defending-the-US-Go vernment-which-has-only-the-first-two
In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can't build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center's demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.
Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.
Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.
More info:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm
You can watch the 2010 interview at:
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
Vid eo # 4 - WTC's demolition plan
Video # 14 - WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
Videos # 24/25 - chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)
Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:
http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/
I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes but go check the definition of 'Ground Zero' in the old dictionaries you have at home. You'll find that there would only be one definition and that would be something like:
'the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs'.
After 9/11, the US government sent people round to every bookshop and public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries with amended versions which have an expanded meaning of 'Ground Zero'. The new versions (even of old editions) have 2 extra meanings which are:
2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change
3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE
Have a look at this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBQuoPi_grw
At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of 'Ground Zero'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]