Dianne Feinstein Receives Three Times More Cash From Intelligence Contractors Than Patrick Leahy
from the funny-how-that-works dept
While there are many bills that have been introduced in Congress in response to the revelations about the NSA (thank you, Ed Snowden), there really are only two that matter right now in terms of actually having a chance of moving forward. One is good, one is terrible. There is the USA FREEDOM Act, introduced in the Senate by Senator Patrick Leahy, which actually tries to rein in many of the abuses. It's not perfect, but it's a very good bill. Then there's the fake reform bill, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein, officially dubbed the FISA Improvements Act, but which is really designed to legalize the NSA's abuses and open the door to making it even worse.It's no secret that Feinstein is the abused spouse of the NSA, always defending her man, no matter how many times it lies and cheats on her, so I doubt it's much of a surprise to find that those who stand to benefit from a strong NSA have been contributing boatloads to Senator Feinstein.
The good folks over at MapLight, thought it might be interesting to see how Feinstein's contributions from intelligence contractors compared to those received by USA FREEDOM Act sponsor Pat Leahy. The answer will not surprise you. Feinstein received three times as much money as Leahy since 2007 (basically a single Senatorial term).
Now, you could easily make the argument that these companies support the politicians most who already support them (i.e., the cause and effect are reversed). But, as Larry Lessig has pointed out time and time again, these kinds of situations are a form of soft corruption that clearly raise significant questions in the mind of the public about why politicians are supporting what they support. Is it because it's good policy -- or is it because of the money. This level of soft corruption has real consequences beyond just policy -- it destroys the trust and credibility of the government.
Dept. of Defense Intelligence Services Contractors Contributions to Senator *Feinstein Contributions to Senator Leahy General Dynamics $43,750 $13,300 Northrop Grumman $29,800 $6,000 Lockheed Martin $10,000 $11,000 Honeywell International $10,000 $5,000 **L-3 Communications $6,500 --- AECOM $7,000 --- $107,050 $35,300 *Not included in the chart is a $250 contribution to Senator Feinstein from Johns Hopkins University, #19 on the USASpending list
**Totals for L-3 Communications Corporations, L-3 National Securities Solutions Inc. and L-3 Communications Holding Inc. were combined for this analysis.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: campaigns, contributions, dianne feinstein, fisa improvements act, lobbyists, nsa, nsa reform, pat leahy, usa freedom act
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Instead of getting people who are only interested in furthering their own bank accounts you would only get people who are legitimately interested in serving their country and their constituents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Sackcloth and asses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
...conducting a long term investigation which may or may not result in charges after extensive and careful consideration.*
---
* con·sid·er·a·tion [kuhn-sid-uh-rey-shuhn] 5.a recompense or payment, as for work done
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/consideration
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
seems to me they are a match made in (spying) heaven! she is as much a liar and cheat as the NSA, so go well together. i just hope the people realise it when it comes to election time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Purchasing Decisions
I usually don't buy products I already own. I'm reminded of the definition of an "honest politician", i.e.- one who stays bought. Which merely confirms what we've long known about Feinswine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There has to be more "off the books" money floating around somewhere. I heard a popular "off the books" contribution, is giving someone in a Senator's family a no-show job with a defense contractor.
That person never has to show up for work, yet they still receive a 6 figure salary from General Dynamics, for example.
In fact, I remember hearing about JP Morgan hiring a Chinese politician's son and doing the exact same thing. That allowed JP Morgan to gain a favorable position in Chinese business deals.
http://money.cnn.com/2013/11/01/news/companies/jpmorgan-china-probe/
Once someone gives themselves to corruption. The corruption just keep snowballing inside them, until that person becomes a twisted, evil shell of their former self.
That's what we're seeing with Senator Spystein and Misrep. Rogers. They're attempting to destroy a 200+ year old law that has been the corner stone of US democracy and freedom, since the founding of America.
That law they're attempting to destroy, is called the Constitution of the United States of America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
from the funny-how-that-works dept
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow, so cheap.
Geeze, lady, you're selling yourself short.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wow, so cheap.
Family members, friends, business fronts(e.g. LLC's) etc.
People should do to her what she wants to do to everybody else and map every single contact she has and see where those others are going too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"destroys the trust and credibility" -- Who was fool enough to grant it in first place?
Writing tips: "Than Patrick Leahy" is equivocal as could mean Feinstein got contributions from both contractors and Leahy: you probably mean "than Leady did"; and "of" in your "of the government" is not equivalent to "in".
But this gives rise to a new tagline:
What is this? A political blog?
05:49:34[g-402-7]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "destroys the trust and credibility" -- Who was fool enough to grant it in first place?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In a better world, Sen. Feinstein would be sitting in jail right now with Alexander and Clapper for, quite literally, selling us out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Politics and money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]