When Even Bloomberg Is Saying The TPP Is A Dangerous 'Corporatist Power Grab' That Everyone Should Avoid...
from the put-it-out-of-it's-misery dept
For years now, we've been arguing about the dangers of the TPP agreement, how it's nothing more than the USTR teaming up with giant legacy companies to create a secretive massive corporatist, crony capitalist attack on the public, on innovation and on the economy. As the agreement moves closer to completion, it appears that others are noticing the same thing. Incredibly, while the NY Times has columnists endorsing the agreement, Bloomberg News, a publication that sometimes seems so beholden to promoting blind corporate power over all else that it recently censored itself to avoid losing business deals, now has a columnist flat out calling the TPP an ugly secretive "corporatist power grab" that pretty much all countries should avoid.U.S. lawmakers and civil-liberties groups have complained for some time about the opacity surrounding the treaty’s terms. Mild grousing turned into outrage last month after WikiLeaks did what Barack Obama’s White House refuses to: share portions of the document with the public. The draft of the intellectual-property rights chapter by Julian Assange’s outfit validated the worst fears -- that TPP is a corporatist power grab. Rather than heed the outcry, the U.S. doubled down on secrecy, refusing to disclose more details.From there, columnist William Pesek explained that most of the more advanced economies in Asia know that it's a bad idea to be involved in the TPP, and that's why they're staying away:
Hasn’t the U.S. wondered why so many of East Asia’s most promising democracies have so far avoided the treaty? The popular excuse for why Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand aren’t yet among the 12 TPP economies is that they aren’t ready or are trapped by their own timidity. A better explanation is that their leaders realize that truly transparent and accountable governments, to borrow Kerry’s own words, shouldn’t be leading their people into the unknown.The article goes on to mock the USTR's arguments that it knows what it's doing better than the public and that you peons shouldn't worry about the TPP at all. Pesek points out that the secrecy in all of this from the Obama administration is more along the lines of what you'd expect from a "closed Communist Party state" and the only reason to negotiate like that is "to circumvent the legislative process."
Here's a general tip to the good folks at the USTR: when Bloomberg News, of all places, is calling the trade agreement you're working on "a corporatist power grab," comparing the secrecy to "closed Communist Party states," telling every other country to back out, and decrying the general lack of democracy in the agreement... perhaps it's time to rethink your strategy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: corporatist power grab, crony capitalism, tpp, trade agreement, ustr
Companies: bloomberg
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"For years now, we've been arguing about the dangers of the TPP agreement,
But, FINE. If you're at last coming round to the Populist view, that's progress.
HOWEVER, just because a globalist -- another word you need to pick up as pejorative and use more often -- organ denounces it, doesn't mean that the globalist organ is against it: could just be free to gain public support because knows the fix is in. -- And that's my bet here.
Here's a key point "libertarians" don't get: lower tax rates, especially on unearned income, actually help only The Rich to concentrate money and control the economy.
12:27:09[n-730-0]
[ * That's not necessarily humor given evidence in some comments around here. ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "For years now, we've been arguing about the dangers of the TPP agreement,
You mean YOU USED GOOGLE!??
Hit the lights, lock the doors, is that window locked? I hear something outside, oh no it's the GOOGLE STREETVIEW VAN, NINJAS ARE POURING OUT, THEY'RE COMING IN THROUGH THE CEILING
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
so you admit Google provides a valuable service then?
also, if you look at past TPP posts Mike clearly is warning against the cronyism even when he doesn't use that exact word.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
#StopTheTPP!!
http://tinyurl.com/StopTPPSign
✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋ ✋
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TPP
[ link to this | view in thread ]