James Clapper Admits In Private That He's Really Not Too Concerned About Terrorists Changing Communications After Snowden

from the faux-outrage dept

We already covered Barton Gellman's fascinating interview with Ed Snowden, but there are some other interesting tidbits I wanted to cover in separate posts. In particular, Gellman reveals, via an anonymous source, that Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, has admitted in private that he's not actually too concerned about terrorists changing their communications habits in the wake of the Snowden revelations. Basically, he recognizes that there are lots of ways to track and to find terrorists, and if they want to communicate efficiently, sooner or later they're going to trip up and reveal themselves:
Clapper has said repeatedly in public that the leaks did great damage, but in private he has taken a more nuanced stance. A review of early damage assessments in previous espionage cases, he said in one closed-door briefing this fall, found that dire forecasts of harm were seldom borne out.

“People must communicate,” he said, according to one participant who described the confidential meeting on the condition of anonymity. “They will make mistakes, and we will exploit them.”
Of course, this is quite different than the influx of reports from reporters quoting "anonymous administration officials" in late June, who kept insisting that the NSA was somehow damaged beyond all belief because terrorists were changing how they communicated. That was clearly overblown from the very beginning for a variety of reasons. First, the serious terrorists already suspected any such communications systems were compromised and weren't using them (see, for example, how bin Laden refused to use the internet at all). Second, the claim that officials knew terrorists had changed how they communicated showed that they were able to observe the new form of communication as well, suggesting no actual (or at least no significant) loss in ability to monitor.

Either way, it's interesting to see confirmed what most of us knew: that Clapper and the other NSA defenders have known pretty much all along that Snowden didn't do any real "harm," but they had no problem fanning the flames of misleading claims to make him out to have caused serious damage.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: barton gellman, communications, ed snowden, james clapper, nsa, surveillance


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:10am

    The US is obsessed with terrorism. They are held hostage by it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    weneedhelp (profile), 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:18am

    Re:

    Its just the catalyst. It really has nothing to do with stopping "terrorists." Terrorism... communism... just another ism to exploit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    out_of_the_cornhole, 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:23am

    they won

    Obviously the terrorists have won, yay America!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:26am

    "some other interesting tidbits" -- So where are they?

    And how many Snowden posts do you plan to get out of that near non-news, anyway? And will you be live-blogging this: "Snowden to give televised Christmas address..."?

    Anyhoo, THIS item is actually clever because subtly plants the notion that really are terrorists around, when NSA just imagines such and the FBI creates them out of patsies. So as propaganda, you've spread it. Wish you'd quit re-writing from Establishment sources, WashPo here...

    Techdirt's motto: The confusion has become so complete that it's beyond correction.

    06:25:51[h-626-6]

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:31am

    File this under see-we-don't-really-the-nsa-i-told-you-so-nanana.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 10:33am

    “They will make mistakes, and we will exploit them.”

    That's exactly what the NSA should be doing. Targeting individuals of whom they have reasonable and articuable suspicion of. If they're an American, get probable cause and a warrant. There are enough vulnerabilities out there that you don't need to spy on the whole world to gather intelligence. Run TAO on known baddies and their associates. Keep records of all of these activities and do proper, meaningful oversight on a regular basis. Institutional power is loathe to give up any capabilities once it attains it, but when the capabilities don't show any real value and only detriment to civil liberties and opportunities for abuse, the public must demand they be stopped.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 11:19am

    more importantly, they have all done as much as possible to take the eye off of what they have been and are still doing. the best form of defense is attack. they have attacked Snowden, made him out to have been a traitor and to have done tremendous harm that could jeopardize the American way of life. in actual fact, it's them that have done the damage, but obviously wont admit it. even if they were called to account for what they have done, it wouldn't stop them from sleeping soundly!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    DM, 24 Dec 2013 @ 11:49am

    Mr. Clapper...

    Mr. Clapper has publicly proven himself to be an inattentive, and untrustworthy person, incapable of being truthful to his employers. Any news story parroting anything he may have to say is not worth the screen space the print occupies.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Hephaestus (profile), 24 Dec 2013 @ 11:49am

    The reason why Clapper isn't concerned about terrorists changing tactics after the Snowden leaks is they were not using the technology in the first place. Makes you wonder what the system is really meant for.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 12:56pm

    Even when they were hunting Bin Laudin, it was demonstrated that Bin Laudin was already aware of the spying on electronic communications. He had no cell phone and no internet service.

    When he wanted a message out into the public he sent a messenger with a USB thumb drive to get it out. It told you right away, the terrorists are aware their communications are monitored. That demonstrated they were already aware and had changed their methods. Any terrorist that desires security will not be using electronic communications themselves, they will be using a messenger. Those that do communicate won't be who they are after, it will be the small fry willing to go do errands.

    The whole business is not about terrorism despite the billing. Who is most likely to use and not worry about electronic communications regularly? It will be those who believe they have no reason to hide. What that tells you is these security agencies are seeing the public at large as the enemy.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Dec 2013 @ 6:05pm

    Terrorists don't use Gmail, they use Gmule.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Dec 2013 @ 4:05am

    "The basic structure of the Internet itself is now in question, as [...] U.S. technology giants including Google, Microsoft and Yahoo take extraordinary steps to block the collection of data by their government."

    Really? What a bull shit journalism.

    No wonder they dumped this garbage on Bezos.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Dec 2013 @ 7:48am

    Terrorists want to scare the government and the people. By freaking out and flushing our constitutional rights down the toilet, we let them win.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    Pragmatic, 3 Jan 2014 @ 7:24am

    Re:

    Keeping "we the people" in check.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.