John McCain Proposes A New Senate Committee To Do What The Intelligence Committee Is Supposed To Do
from the don't-we-have-that-already dept
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence came out of the Church Committee, which was set up to explore abuses by the intelligence community, and to create a more functioning oversight of the intelligence community. Of course, as we've seen over the years, what started out as an effort to rein in abuses and to make sure the intelligence community plays by the rules, has instead turned into a committee to basically be complicit in many of those abuses and to try to run interference in Congress against any attempt to stop them. Either way, it seems somewhat ironic that Senator John McCain, who is not currently a member of the Intelligence Committee, has now proposed a brand new "select committee" to explore Congress's oversight of the intelligence community. Think of it as a shadow intelligence committee.The full resolution even notes:
Whereas senior officials in the intelligence community may have misled Congress or otherwise obfuscated the nature, extent, or use of certain intelligence-collection programs, operations, and activities of the National Security Agency, including intelligence-collection programs affecting Americans;That said, I wouldn't think of this so much as a new Church Committee at all. While the above sections do suggest some interest in reining in a rogue intelligence community, much of the other aspects of the proposed committee are focused on things like exploring how the Snowden leak happened in the first place, whether or not the NSA should stop using contractors, and whether or not the Snowden leaks "harmed" US spying methods (note that they don't seem to want to explore whether or not informing the public may actually help).
Whereas the provision of incomplete or inaccurate information by officials of the intelligence community has inhibited effective congressional oversight of certain intelligence-collection programs, operations, and activities of the National Security Agency, including intelligence- collection programs affecting Americans, and undermined congressional and public support of these programs;
So, yes, this proposed committee seems more like the status quo, but at the same time, something of a slap in the face to the existing Intelligence Committee and the fact that it doesn't seem to have done its job.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, ed snowden, intelligence committee, john mccain, leaks, select committee, surveillance
Reader Comments
The First Word
“So, McCain wants to set up a brand spanking new committee to investigate abuses by the NSA and intelligence community and failures of the intelligence committees to oversee it. But instead, he manages to ensure that that committee is attended by the biggest of NSA apologists and those who are complicit in the very thing being investigated while also ensuring that those calling out the abuse and oversight failures aren't in attendance.
This is a committee purposely crafted to not find anything wrong with the NSA.
Does he really think we're that stupid?
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Select Comittee
the new 'select committee'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Select Comittee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So, McCain wants to set up a brand spanking new committee to investigate abuses by the NSA and intelligence community and failures of the intelligence committees to oversee it. But instead, he manages to ensure that that committee is attended by the biggest of NSA apologists and those who are complicit in the very thing being investigated while also ensuring that those calling out the abuse and oversight failures aren't in attendance.
This is a committee purposely crafted to not find anything wrong with the NSA.
Does he really think we're that stupid?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Does he really think we're that stupid?"
Just imagine how many somewhat "conservative" dems and independent votors flocked to Barrry "Oathbreaker-In-Cheif" Obama when he listened to his handlers, and to double down on the stupidity, and chose S. Palin as a running mate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Safety!
Security is the apex of an uninformed citizenry.
Committee's exist to help you ... Committee's keep us safe, healthy, fed, employed, traveling without hassling and, most of all, ... I have no idea where I'm going with this. It's almost as if I didn't have a point.. hmmm..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
When the MSM supports it and hides your lies chances are the general public falls for the big lie....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Problem is these people chosen to be on this new committee are the same old same old that got us in this place to begin with. I don't know anyone that thought Obama's speech was something the public could depend on as the government doing something about the real issues. Nor will these people change their tune once ensconced into the seat of a new committee. Nor will the public be fooled by what is taking place.
I've always said not to listen to what politicians say, look at what they do for clues as to what is going on. Wyden and Udall are two that the NSA is very uncomfortable over having anything to do with oversight. This is their method of removing those two senators. McCain is already on a short leash as his home constituents have issued a rebuke over his congressional actions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maverick !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
McCain Burger and Fries
Nope. I'd call it John McCain's Public Relations Trick.
Its exactly the kind of thing one should expect from someone like McCain. Like Obama, faking sincerity is his forte.
Its entire purpose is to regain the "confidence" of the public, by pretending to do what needs to be done, exactly as Obama has been doing with his TV appearances. This is precisely the kind of response you will always get from government when its caught with its hand in your pocket.
Its the public's confidence that government seeks to restore, for the very same reason that any con-man would.
And to answer the question in the top insightful post:
"This is a committee purposely crafted to not find anything wrong with the NSA. Does he really think we're that stupid?"
Yes, absolutely.
After all, they've been doing this sort of thing for decades and we are only now catching on, and only because someone named Snowden forced the facts down our throats.
Read up on Hoover.
How can they NOT think we're that stupid?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Word
“