A Look Back In Techdirt History
from the going-back,-back,-back... dept
We're trying something new this week. I realized last week that we'd actually hit the 15th anniversary of the very first Techdirt blog post. The site had existed for nearly two years before that, but was mainly done as an email newsletter. Back in March of 1999, the word "blog" still didn't even exist until a few months later (though "weblog" had been around for a little while before that) and didn't really catch on for a couple years. Anyway, given 15 years of blog posts, I thought it might be fun to look back at what we were writing about five, ten and fifteen years ago.Five years ago:
Really not too much different, honestly. Believe it or not, we were talking about how the NSA and Keith Alexander were trying to increase their ability to do dragnet surveillance by pretending that it was all about "cybersecurity." Some things never change. We were also talking about how corporate lobbyists from the entertainment, pharma and tech industries had too much influence over a trade agreement (in that case, it was the early days of ACTA). And, of course, we were talking about business models and copyright issues. We wrote about how musician Jill Sobule had successfully crowdfunded an album -- back in the days when crowdfunding was new (this was actually a month before Kickstarter was founded). We also wrote about the FBI getting a big chunk of money to go after copyright infringement. And, finally, we had a story about how U2's Bono said he was upset about piracy, but didn't want to speak out too much, since he was so wealthy.
Ten years ago:
Going back ten years, we see some things are still the same, while others are quite different. On the similar front, we've got stories of the MPAA ghostwriting letters for state attorneys general to send to makers of various P2P software to scare them into shutting down, as well as pushing for a bizarre law in California that would require anyone who sent "professional" audiovisual content over the internet to include their name and address with the file. Hollywood never stops playing these kinds of games. We also wrote about fears that Comcast might destroy the internet -- believe it or not, over a different proposed merger (Disney) at the time. And there were the beginnings of people recognizing just how truly awful patent trolls were.
But not everything was the same. People were just beginning to realize that streaming music might be a thing, and that it would lead some people to no longer value "owning" a music file. Camera phones were still a new thing and many stories were about how scary and awful they were -- so we were amazed to actually finally see a positive story about how a cameraphone stopped a crime.
Fifteen years ago:
These were the early days of Techdirt as a blog, and our posts were a lot shorter at the time. This was the middle of the original dotcom bubble, so there was some discussion about dot com IPOs, along with news of AOL laying off Netscape employees. We were amazed at how much companies were charging for early MP3 players. Oh, and we figured that the whole Y2K scare was likely overhyped.
There were some stories that still fit with our general coverage today, including a quick post disagreeing with Mark Cuban's view at the time that MP3s would die out to proprietary formats (and that free content would go away). We had a post about the big virtual currency of the time, called Beenz, which many people still compare Bitcoin to today. We discussed a silly trademark dispute between a software company and a beer company. We wrote about fears that CD-R's would increase piracy and... how then
Some things just never change... Anyway, let us know what you think about these "look back in history" posts...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/990318/154215.shtml
which mentions a PDA that has, as part of its marketing campaign "a colour screen and the ability to play back MP3s". It seems ridiculous to us in the year 2014 to say "Buy our gadget! It has a a colour screen and can play MP3s!" because it's now standard fare for pretty much every mobile gadget to have them. No doubt in 15-20 years, we'll be rocking smartphones with Geforce GTX Titan level graphics capabilities and terabytes of onboard storage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/990323/1640238.shtml
If I had had internet access at the time you posted that article (and had read Dune, I didn't until a few years later) I would have posted Dune's famous quote "Thou Shalt Not Make a Machine in the Likeness of a Human Mind"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
15 years reading this blog
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
What good is an archive when content can be removed from it so easily?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
staying power
One change I've noticed is that Mike does not respond to comments (trolls or otherwise) nearly as much as he used to. But that's the pattern of most bloggers, it seems -- and to no surprise.
And regarding Archive.org, the typical situation I've seen is that after a site owner decides to finally give it up, the domain is bought by someone else (whether a squatter or actual user) who puts up a robots.txt, which causes every saved page on Archive.org, often going back many years, to disappear instantly. (let's hope that never happens with techdirt)
So Happy Anniversary, Techdirt. Now let's break out the champagne!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Duh. That was a dumb mistake. Fixed. Thanks...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bono
http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/for+a+song
Sorry Boner, been that way a long time. The only difference is, I need water, although I filter it too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The first major "troll" we had went by the name "dorpus." He was around for a few years... guessing 2004 - 2007 or so, but I don't remember exactly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Congrats
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
not a fan
I come to Techdirt for great writing and good insights on new developments, not to look back at the good old days. Live in the now and the future, not the past.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: not a fan
If TD has been posting these look back posts every day I have been missing it. Are you talking about the best comments of the week posts, or favorite TD posts of the week?
Scientific American features summaries of some stories they ran 50, 100 and 150 years ago and I find it fascinating. Personally rather than somebody's favorite TD posts of the week I would rather see something about what TD posted 5, 10, and 15 years ago that week.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I think it was workshop.ca or something
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: not a fan
But yes, daily is too often. How about weekly? On the weekend, when nothing's going on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: not a fan
Huh? Never planned to do them daily. We're thinking once a week as a weekend post.
[ link to this | view in thread ]