Good To See: White House Will Now Make Some Federal Data Public Domain Worldwide Via Creative Commons CC0
from the good-move dept
As we've discussed plenty of times in the past, works created by the federal government here in the US are automatically in the public domain. There are some minor exceptions -- works created by others for the government can have copyright, and copyrights can be transferred to the US government. However, there's also one big exception, even if it's never really used: that public domain nature only applies to the US. Most other countries have concepts like crown copyright that allows government works to be covered by copyright -- and technically, works of the federal government that are public domain in the US can be considered covered by copyright elsewhere:The prohibition on copyright protection for United States Government works is not intended to have any effect on protection of these works abroad. Works of the governments of most other countries are copyrighted. There are no valid policy reasons for denying such protection to United States Government works in foreign countries, or for precluding the Government from making licenses for the use of its works abroad.In practice, the US government has never really enforced that foreign copyright. However, with the release of the administration's new Open Data Action Plan, the federal government is finally using CC0 declaration to waive copyright globally when it comes to datasets from certain government agencies. Additionally, the report itself is using the same CC0 dedication, while correctly noting that such a thing isn't even needed (nor could it really be used) for the work within the US:
As a work of the United States Government, this document is in the public domain within the United States. Additionally, the United States Government waives copyright and related rights in this work worldwide through the CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.This is a step in the right direction. Historically, we've seen how making US government data completely free has helped industries grow and innovate.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cc0, copyright, creative commons, crown copyright, federal copyright, federal data, public domain
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
not everyone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
THIS ARTICLE IS FALSE
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
You can't. Some sort of explicit statement has to be made saying something like, "To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently, irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights," which is literally what the CC0 license does.
Jesus fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucking Christ, why are those who are the least informed so often the most sneering and condescending when attempting to "correct" others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
Automatic copyright, and no ability to not have your creations covered by copyright, just more evidence that copyright was not written with actual creators in mind, but copyright owners. Because really, when you're telling a creator that they cannot give their work to the public, even if they wanted to, how is that supposed to be helping them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
Ironically it's actually reducing the rights of the creator to do what they want with their work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
So many people think “Creative Commons” is just one licence...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
Nice attitude.
We tried to be clear. The work is public domain in the US, and the gov't is explicitly waiving all copyright worldwide via a CC0 declaration, which is as close to public domain as you can basically get.
As for the "license" point -- CC0 is not a license, it's a declaration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: CREATIVE COMMONS IS NOT PUBLIC DOMAIN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
THIS ARTICLE IS FALSE
Hahaha! Yeah, you'd think Mike would know what a license is. But, then again, if you've read TD before, maybe you wouldn't. Mike doesn't know what he's talking about most of the time. That's why he runs from criticism like the little insecure and angry coward that he is.
If it's in the public domain, then it's not licensed, Mikey. Duh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]