House Reauthorizes Intelligence Community Funding; Refuses To Consider Amendments To Limit Domestic Surveillance
from the because-of-course dept
This is hardly a surprise given the events of the past few weeks, but the House on Friday passed legislation to authorize intelligence activities for the next year. It sailed through easily, 345 to 59. While a number of Representatives, including Zoe Lofgren, Justin Amash and Rush Holt attempted to make amendments that would do things like stop the NSA from adding back doors to encryption, or beef up whistleblower protections, I imagine it will surprise none of you to discover that the Rules Committee did not allow those amendments to come up for a vote.Notably, those three Reps whose amendments were ignored also voted against the overall reauthorization. It's interesting to note that Rep. Sensenbrenner voted against the reauthorization as well, though it's not clear why. Rep. Alan Grayson actually introduced a bunch of amendments to curb the NSA's powers, none of which were allowed, but he still voted in favor of the overall authorization. In the end, this reauthorization was going to go through one way or the other, so this isn't a huge surprise. With the failure of most of what was good in the USA Freedom Act in the House, it quickly became clear that the House wasn't going to fix things any time soon.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: amendments, funding, intelligence, justin amash, reauthorization, rush holt, zoe lofgren
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
National solidarity is simply not possible until almost all Americans are subjugated and of course, at that point, its too late. Your future does not look good America.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My rep voted for it...
I'll be contacting him again now to let him know I am disappointed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: My rep voted for it...
What a politicians says is nothing more than empty words, unless it's followed by matching action.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unfortunately the shadows are winning and the One is nowhere to be found. Kosh was right, the avalanche has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Surely you don't still think that the mob that runs the USA from Washington will actually hear your demands, or that, if they did, they would do anything other than laugh hysterically at your antics.
Such determined loyalty to a dead system should be rewarded - but of course, it will only get more of the same.
I suppose you could always, hehehehehe, cast a vote, hehehehe, and get "change", hahahahahaha, that way, hohohohoho.... you know, use that dead system that got you here to get you out of here. That should work well eh.
Demand all you want to your heart's content - you'll not get anyone's attention - because the Fed and your local politicians are only listening to the guys waving fistfuls of money.
Now if you happen to have a yacht or two you can offer, you might just get someone's attention. Mind you, they will very likely just lie to you to get the offered yacht, unless your demands are the same as the one's their other "benefactors" are demanding.
----
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sigh
I can't get behind the idea of violence. I think that given the the corruption in Washington and the stupidity of the majority of citizens, the answer will largely be addressed by committed techies who understand the issues and devote energy to hardening the web. I'd donate to crowd-funded research to create privacy tools. Perfect? No, but at this point it seems like the most likely avenue to success. The only thing that policy makers appear to be good at these days is deception, so we can't rely on any kind of real oversight.
I also think that as more companies (like UPS this week) are shown to be complicit in the surveillance, perhaps business will push back if it hurts their bottomline enough.
These assholes need to start pushing back.
Depressing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sigh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sigh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Give no pressure, get no change, and curse the lot of them that only do the right thing........UNDER PRESSURE........being inept at the role they dont understand, or the special hell for those that do
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
U gotta giggle
Simply put, 345 to 59 isn't "snuck it by" or "just barely passed" it means that less than 15% voted against. In most parts of the world, that is a clear answer. Considering the frame of public debate on the subject, it's a pretty clear indication of where the majority of the house sits.
As for amendments never coming up for a vote, if they really feel that they did everything by the book and the amendments never made it to the floor, then they should take legal action to deal with it. Reality is that their own parties likely killed the amendments before they made it to the floor, understanding that they did not have anywhere near the votes to get the amendment in.
As for the comments, anyone suggesting armed rebellion really needs to take a time out. If you want change in America you don't do it with a gun. Plenty of people have those, and you aren't getting any positive change from them. You get positive change when you convince people through reasonable discourse to get rid of the lifetime congress critters and replace them with people you feel better represent your ideals. But remember, you may not be the majority, and the reason the critters are there is because the people vote for them plain and simple.
The truth is that the US spy agencies aren't doing anything different today than they have done forever, please see the FBI files from the 60s as an example. The only difference, the only big revelation in the whole Snowden thing is that the government is actually pretty good at it, and they have used pretty much every trick available to them. That includes the things that many here would cheer on if a pirate or hacker was using them to "liberate" data.
The best part about Snowden? 50% or more of it is likely disinformation. Which half do you think it is?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: U gotta giggle
The truth is that the US spy agencies aren't doing anything different today than they have done forever, please see the FBI files from the 60s as an example."
Absolutely true, but I'm not sure why you'd want to remind everyone. The history of these agencies is exactly how we know that their current actions need to be stopped because they only lead to abuse, oppression, and severe damage to us all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: U gotta giggle
The truth is that most of our representatives are bought and paid for by big business. The NSA intercepts discussions talking about new technologies and trade secrets of businesses all over the world and provide those conversations and intercepted emails to their buddies at certain connected corporations. The same ones who's technology enables such spying. The corporation provides the technology and the NSA provides the intelligence in return.
If big business is profiting significantly off of this technology provided to the NSA... why do anything to stop it. That is what you are seeing happen in Congress. That the limits on what the NSA can and cannot do being demanded by the people are not given a single second of consideration by the powers that be. Discussion of those limits is brushed aside as fast as it possibly can and in its place complete reauthorization with no discussion or debate whatsoever. The corporate bought representatives all falling in line.
When it comes to representatives like Alan Grayson. I dont think they are corrupt themselves. But in having to deal with their corrupted colleagues they must sacrifice their principles if they are willing to get ANYTHING done. They got to their positions through willingness to get with the program. Once they actually have power that program they are supposed to go along with is being dictated to them. To stray from the program is to be cast out in the woods with nothing but a title. Good luck on re-election when you are out in the woods.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]