University Court Tries To Stifle Coverage Of Its Controversial Actions; Guarantees Only That It Will Be Covered More Thoroughly
from the Judge-Streisand-presiding dept
Some infighting has broken out at Baylor University. A tangled web of impeachment proceedings and sketchy behavior has resulted in some unflattering coverage of a lawsuit filed against the internal vice president of the court -- whom critics claim is failing to uphold her duties and damaging the morale of the student government.Most of this is detailed in the student paper, the Baylor Lariat. And it's seemingly this unflattering coverage that has resulted in the university student court's decision to issue the following gag order. (h/t to Adam Steinbaugh)
The Baylor University Student Court (hereinafter “the Court”), acting in reaction to the aforementioned case, yet to be heard in trial, hereby commands the following:In other words, there will be very minimal questioning of our position/authority, and SPOKSPERSON Cody Coll will be the main filter between your impertinent questions and our answers (if any). If you want to play Junior Investigative Journalist and ask difficult/embarrassing questions that don't fall into the procedural/substantive divisions, you will be held in contempt of court and referred to the dean for further punishment. Here's Coll justifying the court's move.
(I) That no party to the matter aforementioned, plaintiff or defendant or their respective counsel, shall make contact with any member of the Court except:
For PROCEDURAL questions, the party shall contact the Clerk of the Court, Charlotte Weston; and
For SUBSTANTIVE questions, the party shall contact the Chief Justice of the Court, Cody Coll.
Furthermore, (II) No member of the press shall make intentional contact with any member of the Court regarding the case aforementioned EXCEPT the Chief Justice of the Court, Cody Coll, who shall serve as the SOLE SPOKSPERSON [sic] FOR THE COURT.
“It’s within the purview of the chief justice to instruct the justices to not communicate with the media,” he said. “It’s also within the jurisdiction of the court to issue an order such as the one that was issued yesterday.”Sure, it may be in the "purview" of the chief justice. But you know what else it is? Stupid. Pure, unvarnished stupid.
The internal wranglings of a university's student government will have little to no bearing on anything happening outside of its sphere of influence. This "shut up, the court explained" gag order isn't likely to trigger a federal First Amendment lawsuit. And, yes, this whole thing somehow ties into the 2nd Amendment (no, seriously), perhaps the most contentious of our amendments and the one virtually guaranteed to provoke only the most extreme arguments from both sides.
So, it's mainly Baylor's teapot tempest, but those who issued this half-assed gag order will be real adults one day with real jobs, possibly in the public sector where they could do some real damage if these irrational urges aren't loudly and swiftly discouraged.
Even if the order is "legal" in the context of the Baylor student body court system, that doesn't make it any less ridiculous. A gag order like this, issued on the heels of negative coverage, may as well have ordered EVERYONE to talk about the student court's failures LOUDLY and AT LENGTH and ALL OVER THE INTERNET. If the court had possessed even a little common sense and foresight, it would have handled this with the same "nothing to see here" aplomb it has handled every other courtroom battle it has dealt with to this point. Baylor's student court may have certain powers, but it can't demand the student press cater to its whims. Even a self-contained government has checks and balances, and here we see this incident is nothing more than a government entity attempting to route around the pesky force of accountability known as "the public."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: baylor lariat, charlotte weston, cody coll, free press, free speech, journalism
Companies: baylor university
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Promising prospects
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Promising prospects
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Baylor's student court is a skank
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jurisdiction
Seems like the 'court' thinks that "because I said so", is sufficient, like a lot of misguided police officers in these here United States (and elsewhere in the world).
Oh, and if this is referred to the Dean of Judicial Affairs, would that not possibly result in a First Amendment challenge via a lawsuit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Jurisdiction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Jurisdiction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Jurisdiction
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Woudn't then next step be...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Face palm
Get them while their young
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oooh! An opportunity for all the media that aren't "the press"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In reality this order was already nullified, and seemed like a badly written order that should only bind the judges like a how a normal court would function.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]