Terrorized Into Irrationality: UK Police Demand Names of Charlie Hebdo *Supporters*
from the confused?-you-will-be dept
It's been sad to watch the Charlie Hebdo story turn from a massive outpouring of solidarity with the victims to an opportunistic exploitation of the strong feelings it produced to attack the very freedoms that solidarity was celebrating. Just how bad things have become can be gauged from this story in the Guardian:
A British police force has apologised after an officer told a newsagent to hand over details of customers who purchased copies of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in the wake of the Paris terror attacks.
Demanding the names of people who bought that commemorative issue clearly makes no sense: they were trying to support Charlie Hebdo, not attack it in any way. And yet the continued terrorization of the public -- by the authorities, that is, not by the so-called "terrorists" -- has induced a kind of irrationality that has apparently now spread to the police. Here's the official "explanation" of what happened:
Wiltshire police confirmed that one of their officers visited a newsagent in Corsham, Wiltshire, to ask for the names of four customers who ordered the commemorative "survivors' issue" of the magazine.A police officer visited a local shop and post office in Corsham to make an assessment of community tensions and, if appropriate, encourage the newsagent's owner to be vigilant. During this conversation the officer requested information about subscribers to the Charlie Hebdo magazine.
This is clearly creating a problem where none exists, purely because fear has become the default condition for society, resulting in heavy-handed and unnecessary interventions of the kind described above. At least the police force concerned seems to recognize this here:
Wiltshire police would like to apologise to the members of public who may be affected by this. Information relating to this specific incident has been permanently and securely disposed of.
That's welcome, but it's worrying and symptomatic of the situation today that a police officer could demand these names without being aware of the absurdity of doing so.
Update: It seems that this was not an isolated event.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: charlie hebdo, free speech, police, terrorism, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Terrorists would never sully their beliefs by reading their enemies' publications.
Q: What's a police officer to do?
A: When in doubt, overreach, and add more hay to that planet-sized haystack.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
UK police and others doing wrong!!!
Every time someone in power has been found to do something wrong or made serious mistakes there is an outcry and three days later they organisation at fault just claims they will look to put procedures in place to ensure those type of things do not happen again.
And the Brits seem to fall for it every time.
just as in may other cases the police will talk about training and new procedures and monitoring of the issue and do essentially what the American cops do when accused do doing something wrong, and end up doing nothing other than protecting their own.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Saving grace
Think how hosed we'd be if they had any functioning brain cells.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The terrorists have won.
---
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's a two-fer.
So, this newsagent just handed it over when it was demanded? I'll be across the street from their shop with a sign which reads, "This newsagent reports free speech advocates to the authorities!"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm from the government,
The nine most terrifying words in the English language.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: UK police and others doing wrong!!!
1)overreach by an officer
2) process identifies the overreach
3) process publishes the overreach, apologizes for it, and correctly disposes with the results of the overreach.
You can't guarantee it'll never happen again -- people always make bad decisions. They could create penalties for officers who do so, but in that line of work, you often only know if what you did was too much after the fact (that doesn't apply to this specific situation, but any process enacted wouldn't be limited to this specific situation).
So I think that correcting the problem, apologizing, and making the officer's mistake VERY public was probably the correct thing to do. Just the publicity attached to this should be enough to prevent most officers from attempting something like it in the future.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh, really? How? The moment it went onto a database, it was virtually guaranteed to be permanently and securely retained. Pressing "Delete" won't cut it, PC Plod.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Certainly a public relations problem. Not necessarily a (new) law enforcement one.
> During this conversation the officer requested information about subscribers to the Charlie Hebdo magazine.
There's a ", because..." missing here. And a "demanded". People have certainly leapt to the worst possible interpretation fast enough. Given the remediation reported, I'm happy to wait for the other shoe to drop before I spend some of my carefully conserved outrage on this story.
> Just how bad things have become can be gauged from this story in the Guardian: ...
An odd thing to say, in a story where the police department stepped in before publication and "made things better" rather than stonewalled, redacted, or denied. Are you saying that things aren't that bad, then?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
at Update
Because, you know, as we all learned from TV shows, the guy who did it will show up at the crime scene to watch what he did... Sooo what is a normal person to do about it? Imho the only way not to become a suspect is to stay out of everything. Don't go out, stay at home all the time, don't do anything that might be under any circumstance be viewed as suspicious and stay away from anyone because they might be viewed as terrorists one day and you don't want to be friends with a terrorist do you?
If everyone follows that guideline I guess the human species will die in 1 generation but the good thing is, there won't be any terrorists anymore and the various security agencies last news will be "We won!".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anything can and will be used against you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Anything can and will be used against you
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Let the spin begin...
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/prosecutors-focus-on-father-in-german-honor-killi ng-case-a-834752.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hebdo
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Britons never will be slaves."
"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."
"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."
L.O.L. ! L.O.L. ! L.O.L. ! L.O.L. !
[ link to this | view in thread ]
When PCs meet PC
For the authorities, Glyn. The rest of us are looking at each other, scratching our heads and wondering why everyone in an authority position has suddenly gone doolally. Remember the "good old days" when even bombs going off in our cities didn't provoke this level of panic?
RE: the title, you'll probably find that this nonsense is driven by political correctness and that Charlie Hebdo has been labelled hate speech by the powers that be.
Does anyone else remember when this country had a backbone? What has become of us?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: When PCs meet PC
I don't, but I heard about it. It was called The Age of Enlightenment. Unfortunately, it didn't take and was soon followed by Romanticism whose "long-term effect on the growth of nationalism was perhaps more significant" than the artsy stuff it was mostly known for.
AoE was in the 1700s, long before our time. This mess we now have has been brewing for a while. I suppose we can take some satisfaction from that. It takes a long time to fuck things up as bad as this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]