New York Times Turns Ads Off On 'Sensitive' Stories
from the advertising-sensibilities dept
I was looking at the HTML source of a recent New York Times story about a tragic plane accident—150 people feared dead—and noticed this meta tag in its head:
<meta property="ad_sensitivity" content="noads" />
There are no Google results for the tag, so it looks like it hasn't been documented, but it seems like a pretty low-tech way to keep possibly insensitive ads off a very sensitive story—an admirable effort. It's interesting in part because it's almost an acknowledgement that ads are invasive and uncomfortable. They cross over into the intolerable range when we're emotionally vulnerable from a tragic story. Advertisers know this too, and the New York Times might stipulate in contracts they'll try to keep ads off sensitive pages.
If I had to guess, I'd say this is probably a manual switch in their CMS. It would be interesting to see what sorts of stories get dubbed unfit for ads, though scraping enough article pages to get that information might raise some eyebrows on that side of the paywall.
(This information, by the way, doesn't have to be exposed for keeping ads off pages they serve. But it could help with debugging, and definitely could be useful for syndication and maybe even displaying in official apps.)
This isn't the first example of companies declining to advertise against tragedies. Five years ago a user documented that Gmail doesn't show ads on emails that contain words from a certain blacklist, at a certain density—one sensitive word per 167 "normal" words.
Reposted from parker higgins dot net
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ads, choices, sensitive stories
Companies: ny times
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is standard practice
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]