US Patent Office Gamed The System To Make Sure Patent 9 Million Wasn't A Crazy Troll Patent
from the looks-like-it dept
As I'm sure you were carefully anticipating, on Tuesday, April 7th, the US Patent and Trademark Office issued patent 9,000,000. As you of course are already aware, over the past few decades, the USPTO has been rapidly ramping up the number of patents it approves. That's why, even though patents only have a lifetime of 20 years from the date of application, 1/3 of all issued patents are still in force today. Think about that.So, if you're wondering if patent 9,000,000 is a bad, trollish patent, you'll be happy to note that it's not a software or business method patent, but rather a kind of windshield washer system. Not only that, but there's a real company behind it that appears to be making a real product. Well, phew. The USPTO must be happy about that... Or, actually, the USPTO probably went through all the damn patents scheduled to issue on Tuesday to find one that wasn't controversial and magically named it number 9,000,000, though in any other week it would have been in a different batch. As patent blog 1201 Tuesday notes:
One of these patents is not like all those others... and it just so happens to be patent 9,000,000. Oh, and in case you're wondering, there were a bunch of other patents from class 210 "Liquid purification or separation" issued on Tuesday as well -- it's just that they're patents 8,999,153 to 8,999,176, all in a row. So it looks like the USPTO found that one nice, non-controversial patent and plucked it out of the 8,99,160ish range and plopped it directly in the middle of all of those "drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions" and declared it, magically, 9 million, knowing that it might get a bit of attention.Because patents issue at discrete, weekly intervals, the PTO has time generally to group patents of the same “class” together in contiguous blocks of numbers. That’s why you usually don’t see a floor wax patent immediately next to a dessert topping patent. (Unless, of course, it's for both.)
Patent 9,000,000 today is in class 210, “Liquid purification or separation”. Yet, it interrupts a block of patents from class 514, “Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions”:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 9 million, patents, uspto, windshield wiper system
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now when it gets to 10,000,000, that'll be a big deal!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Citations needed even for this fluff.
>>> "9,000,000 ... windshield washer system" -- Again, SO? First cite your evidence it's cherry picked, then state why that's evil.
You're rabidly fixated on patents being evil, but too lazy to more than re-write a piece of fluff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
2. RTFA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
With the average number of office actions per patent being around 2.5, it hardly seems like much of a rubber stamp.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
> Now when it gets to 10,000,000, that'll be a big deal!
Recall the Y2K problem.
Maybe the patent office computers will all go crazy* due to a similar P10M problem. That is, the counter for patent numbers only holds nine digits. Who would have ever dreamed there would even be one million patents. Do we really have that many remarkable innovations in the world around us?
* I didn't want to say 'explode' because that might be taken as a terrorist threat. You seriously cannot even make jokes these days.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
No, you missed Masnick stating "the USPTO probably".
The link only states a conjecture.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Citations needed even for this fluff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sort of like stealing a base. If 99% of all bases are stolen, at some point you have to wonder if you are still serving the spirit of the game.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What was wrong with Class 514?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Because I really can't tell - is this serious, or sarcastic?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Newflash, knucklehead. The fact that you're out_of_the_blue is still painfully obvious. Your plan to try and mask the presence of this pathetic persona fails, every time.
Not forgetting that you and your copyright fanboy buddies all agree that using TOR to mask your IP address is against the law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No. Without insider info it can't be proven
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i can't see the clip from here, all i get is
Geo Restriction
Sorry! The content provider has not given us the rights to play this video in your location.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
well..actually.. in this case i think it is a troll patent... after reading the patent it immediately came to my mind that this looks almost exactly like a water recycler, desalinization and purification device that's used in some countries to make clean drinking water.
They just replaced the chlorine chemical agent in the distribution system with some concentrated windshield detergent.
Water chlorination is still used for water treatment and sterilization in quite a few countries.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
well..actually.. in this case i think it is a troll patent... after reading the patent it immediately came to my mind that this looks almost exactly like a water recycler, desalinization and purification device that's used in some countries to make clean drinking water.
If one is for drinking water and one is for washing windshields, that doesn't sound trollish. You may be setting the bar for newness a little too high.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
ever used a soda machine that can distribute different flavors of drinks? They use a very concentrated liquid as the juice base and they add water to that. CO2-enriched water usually, to make it fizzy.
These guys just patented machines that combine a concentrated liquid with water to obtain another liquid, and with a water recycling system.
Or another thing... floor washing vacuum cleaners that use water for washing also contain such a device in them, and they even use concentrated detergent and recycle the water that they use.
The only major difference between washing a floor and a windshield is the vertical angle.
so yes.. i think this looks like a bit obvious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The ones I'm familiar with don't, and I doubt any others do either. It's so much simpler to just store the dirty water.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Kärcher shows at top of Google search results for me, but there are other manufacturers there too...
https://www.google.com/search?q=vacuum+cleaner+water+recycling
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The number alone shows the dubiousness of patents
It's really gotten out of hand. Patents were not originally intended to be issued for new applications of existing technologies. The technologies themselves were supposed to be new.
People don't seem to appreciate what this means. People seem to think that being the first to think of doing something makes doing that thing patentable, while in reality this makes it less likely to be patentable. It's not the novelty of the idea that makes it patentable, it's the novelty of method of accomplishing it that makes it patentable. Something that people have been trying and failing to do for years, or doing in a much less efficient manner than the one you came up with are the things most likely to be patentable. Those are the real inventions. How often do they happen?
[ link to this | view in thread ]