FTC Gets $1.2 Billion From Drug Company Over 'Pay For Delay' Patent Scam
from the one-down dept
For many years now, we've been covering the pay for delay scam that many pharmaceutical companies have used to effectively pay generic drug makers not to compete with them, even though they are able to do so. The full details of how the scam works are complex, but involve abusing a ridiculous part of the Hatch Waxman Act that grants additional monopoly benefits to the first market entrant of a generic drug. The big pharma firms used that to their advantage, filing bogus lawsuits against those generic drug makers and then agreeing to "settle" the lawsuit they filed by paying the generic drug maker to not actually enter the market. The greater monopoly protection afforded to the big pharma company more than makes up for how much they have to pay the generic drug maker. In short, it's taking advantage of the stupidity of giving drug companies massive monopolies.The FTC started looking into these practices years ago, and two years ago the Supreme Court ruled that the FTC had every right to go after drug makers using antitrust laws over these "deals." And the FTC has been filing lawsuits on an ongoing basis about these deals.
Teva has now settled one such case for a cool $1.2 billion -- giving you a sense of just how valuable it has been to these pharma companies to extend their monopoly, keep out competition and keep drug prices artificially high. With Teva, it was the sleep disorder drug provigil (and, technically, the drugmaker was Cephalon, which Teva then bought). Teva had been fighting with the FTC for years over this, and the case was scheduled to go to trial next week -- but the settlement ends that. The amount, $1.2 billion, by the way, is the largest ever settlement with the FTC. You have to imagine that there will be more of these coming considering the number of other lawsuits and the fact that "pay for delay" was a widespread practice in the pharma industry.
Of course, even with all of this abuse, some people still insist that giving monopoly rights to pharmaceutical companies is the best way to produce new medicines and to provide healthcare. Isn't it about time we began to question those assumptions?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ftc, generic drugs, hatch waxman act, patents, pay for delay, pharmaceuticals, provigil
Companies: cephalon, teva
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That'll show 'em
Yup, with fines like that, I'm sure drug companies will really think twice about abusing the system to keep generics locked up in the future, as clearly there's just no money to be made from doing so.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FTC = Feral Traitor Corp
Close the rogue agency and either deport or execute the entire staff after a speedy trial.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Its likely less than .1% of what they expect to make.
After tax?. yeah that's a joke, they never pay taxes just bonus's to the Corporate Evil Overlord.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
(Disclosure: I'm not a provigil user and if I personally know anyone who is, I'm not aware of it. I just figure that would be the just thing to do.)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: FTC = Feral Traitor Corp
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
1) It's very difficult to prove that someone died due to not having a treatment available, since for any number of reasons, they might have died even if they had gotten the treatment anyway.
2) It's not like this is a cancer drug. Have you ever heard of someone who died due to lack of availability of an expensive prescription sleeping pill?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
...and that right there is the real problem.
Want to fix this whole class of problems? Pass an Anti-Cost-Of-Doing-Business law that mandates that in any case in which a business is found to have violated the law in the pursuit of higher revenue, they must be assessed at minimum a fine of 100% of gross revenue derived from their lawbreaking.
In other words, make it so that crime truly does not pay.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: FTC = Feral Traitor Corp
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fine
Yet this was a settlement. There's a natural tendency to assume that they settled for a fine lower than what they actually made. The only other alternative seems to be that they saw a slam-dunk case in the making, so they scrambled to settle before receiving a verdict that may be even worse. This case seems unlikely to be that clear-cut, at least in a courtroom.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Production costs are typically less than 1%, so year, the $1.2 billion fine is a cost of doing business.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1) Run a website and sell drugs, ID cards, and other illegal substances, but risk getting so many years behind bars, future laws may lock up my grandkids...
-OR-
2) Run a pharmaceutical company, bilk billions from the wares, and get a fine levied by the FTC that's so laughably small, it affects nothing of the business.
The choice is obvious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
We need to look at other ways of funding the R&D not carried out in our universities.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unfortunately
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Justice aint blind.
I mean the total loss of cash by the FTC because of these awful drug company schemes is enormous, and its good to see that the FTC will not suffer so much as it has been, now that they got back some of their money.
Maybe they can use some of the returned money to help get back the rest of their lost capital from all the other FTC-scamming drug companies now.
Justice prevails once again, in the land of the free.
--/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]