CETA Isn't Dead, But Its Corporate Sovereignty Chapter Is Still A Huge, Unresolved Problem

from the and-let's-not-mention-TTIP dept

It's been a while since we last wrote about CETA, the trade deal between Canada and the European Union. Back in March, we noted that the French Secretary of State for External Commerce, Matthias Fekl, said that France would not ratify CETA unless the corporate sovereignty, or investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), provisions were removed or replaced by something completely different. Of course, it's hard not to be sceptical about these statements, since politicians like to grandstand, and are happy to change their positions every few months. But not, it seems, Matthias Fekl. According to a report on the French site Le Devoir (original in French), he's still of the same opinion:

For the Secretary of State for Foreign Trade, Matthias Fekl, who expresses the official position of France, it is not only a question of principle but a fact of life today. If negotiators do not rewrite Article 33 of the [CETA] Treaty which deals with dispute resolution, there will be no ratification.
And it's not just France that has a problem here. According to the article, Fekl said:
Look, this [refusal to accept the corporate sovereignty provisions in CETA] will also be the case in other countries. This isn't meant as a threat. But as far as this chapter is concerned, things must definitely move.
The EU Commissioner for trade, Cecilia Malmström, is well aware of the issues here -- not least because 145,000 people told her in the ISDS consultation last year -- and has presented a concept paper entitled "Investment in TTIP and beyond – the path for reform" (pdf). These are quite similar to proposals made by Fekl for the creation of a new European court to settle trade disputes. But there are two big problems with following that path.

First, the European Commission (and Fekl) have only just begun to sketch out how that reform might look. It is likely to take some time to come up with alternatives like entirely new courts. There is no way that something will be agreed for CETA, which may be ready for ratification quite soon. There's also the problem of TAFTA/TTIP. Given that Malmström has admitted that the current ISDS is unsatisfactory, and that she is trying to come up with something better, it will be hard for her to include it in TAFTA/TTIP in its current form. But the US side has made it clear that it is not happy with dropping corporate sovereignty completely, which leads once more to the problem of time-scales, since a serious replacement for ISDS may not be available even for TTIP. It will be interesting to see how Malmström deals with this key issue for both CETA and TAFTA/TTIP.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: ceta, corporate sovereignty, eu, france, isds


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Jul 2015 @ 1:47am

    NATO is supposed to deconflict our economic systems when odd sovereignty issues come up. I don't think it's an issue.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Jul 2015 @ 9:58am

    Re:

    Ahem.

    NATO isn't supposed to be involved at all with economic systems. (Perhaps you're thinking of another entity?)

    But if CETA goes through as it currently is NATO might very well become involved. They just won't have a choice in the matter.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Jul 2015 @ 11:55am

    Thank you Matthias Fekl

    What I'd like to know is, why with so many politicians involved in these agreements, is Msr. Feki the ONLY one to realize how idiotic the concept of corporate sovereignty is, and how antithetical it is to state sovereignty?

    It's not like it is just constituents who lose out from corporate sovereignty; politicians lose out in the long run too, and the courts lose the most (through dockets being eventually plugged with court cases between two entities with bottomless pockets, instead of being filled with cases involving actual people).

    It is possible that all the countries considering treaties involving corporate sovereignty need to first look at international treaty reform -- so that limits are set on how treaties can be negotiated while upholding the sovereignty of the nations doing the negotiating.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Jul 2015 @ 1:24pm

    Re: Re:

    Ahem, you're an idiot read the most recent iteration of the nato treaty

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 1 Jul 2015 @ 2:49pm

    Re: Thank you Matthias Fekl

    What are you talking about, the politicians involved don't face any personal risk at all. Any lawsuits brought about by corporate sovereignty clauses won't be targeting their money, and with the attention span of most people, probably no-one will remember that they sold out their countries should a lawsuit be brought.

    On the other hand, you can be sure that those writing the agreements are being less-than-subtle about the rewards and punishments for those that help or hinder their desires, and that the politicians are very much paying attention to, as that does affect them.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.