Italian Court Realizes Ridiculousness Of Fining TripAdvisor Over User Reviews
from the well,-at-least-there's-that dept
Back in December, we wrote about a ridiculous situation in Italy, where the site TripAdvisor was fined €500,000 by local regulators because it wasn't magically stopping people from posting "false reviews" on the site. As we noted at the time, it's stories like this that show why, here in the US, Section 230 of the CDA is so important. It makes it clear that you don't blame a third-party website for actions of its users. What the regulators were demanding was an impossibility. There is no realistic way for a user review site to make sure all the reviews are legit, at least not if it wants to allow user reviews, rather than hiring staff to do every review.Thankfully, an Italian court has now overturned the fine and acknowledged that it was ridiculous in the first place. Rather than focusing on the problems of intermediary liability, the court just notes that TripAdvisor never made any promises that the reviews were accurate:
“TripAdvisor never asserted that all its reviews were true, pointing out instead that it is impossible to exercise a blanket control and inviting users to consider ‘trends’ in the reviews rather than single contributions,” the court said. “We do not understand the harm to the consumer identified by the Authority in its concluding arguments.”That's good, though apparently a ridiculous counterproductive group called the National Consumers Union who brought the complaint in the first place wants to keep pressing the issue:
The National Consumers Union remained unconvinced, saying it intended to appeal the court’s “crude thesis.”This, of course, makes no sense. It's an argument for not the internet, in which anyone can express an opinion, but rather a top-down broadcast system, in which any statement must first be vetted. That would, effectively, destroy much of the power of the internet. It's hard to see how that helps "consumers" in Italy at all.
“We recognize that controlling on the Web may be more complicated than in a physical market, but the law and supervisory activity cannot remain permanently two steps behind current progress,” Massimiliano Dona, the union’s secretary, said in a statement.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: intermediary liability, italy, reviews, user generated content
Companies: tripadvisor
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Frauds
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I understand its ok in US to lie in commercials, but EU is different matter. Remember MAC Powerpc ad campain? Got pulled after claiming "fastest pc on the market" bullshit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
but you dont have to, you can be competition leaving bogus garbage.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Consumatori Nazionali Unione
Whose rights are they protecting again?
I suspect this is more about Trip Advisor competition than it is about bad reviews.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's much worse than that.
A FLA court determined that it is ok for a news broadcast to lie about current events, because it is entertainment.
Politicians act shocked when their constituents believe their bullshit because politicians lie all the time, everyone knows that and they should not be surprised.
Ads are not supposed to blatantly lie but are allowed to stretch the truth quite a bit. Truth in advertising was a thing that died a long time ago.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It makes perfect sense
You're just defending them not using the magic red button. Perhaps, the judge should assign a neutral third party to TripAdvisor to sit in the control room and hit the magic red button on a fixed schedule.
Obviously, that's an easy fix to the problem. Darn those EVIL TripAdvisor people and their reluctance to press the magic red button!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]