FTC: 'Roca Labs Has An Adversarial Relationship With The Truth'; Suggests Plans To Crack Down On More Gag Clauses
from the good-news dept
Roca Labs threatened to sue us here at Techdirt twice for publishing accurate articles about the company, its sketchy practices and legal threats -- and especially for its ridiculous "gag clause" that told customers they could never say disparaging things about the product online. Among other things, Roca Labs threatened others for claiming its products were "snake oil" and us for merely repeating statements that were in court filings. So we were certainly pleased last week when the FTC finally took Roca Labs to court, for both deceptive and misleading advertising and over the gag clause itself.On Monday, the FTC put out a blog post about this where it went into more detail about why it was targeting Roca Labs:
“Roca Labs had an adversarial relationship with the truth,” said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “Not only did they make false or unsubstantiated weight-loss claims, they also attempted to intimidate their own customers from sharing truthful – and truly negative – reviews of their products.”I can't wait to see Roca Labs' "Independent General Counsel" Paul Berger now try to threaten the FTC with one of his standard "You're defaming us!" letters.
In the meantime, though, there is a more important element in all of this, which is that this is the first time we've seen the FTC go after these gag clauses. We've been writing about such gag clauses for many years, going back to a dentist who billed someone $100 per day for a negative review. Then there was the infamous KlearGear case, where the online retailer demanded $3,500 for a negative review (from a non-customer!).
A year ago, we had a post highlighting a bunch of these kinds of gag clauses from a variety of different companies. California passed a state law outlawing such non-disparagement clauses, and a federal bill was introduced earlier this year -- though it has gone nowhere.
But the fact that the FTC directly called out the practice suggests that, while we wait for Congress to get its act together, the FTC may be willing to go after the more egregious providers of such clauses.
In a complaint filed in federal court, the FTC alleges that Roca Labs, Inc.; Roca Labs Nutraceutical USA, Inc.; and their principals have sued and threatened to sue consumers who shared their negative experiences online or complained to the Better Business Bureau, stating that the consumers violated the non-disparagement provisions of the “Terms and Conditions” they supposedly agreed to when they bought the products. The FTC alleges that these gag clause provisions, and the defendants’ related warnings, threats, and lawsuits, harm consumers by unfairly barring purchasers from sharing truthful, negative comments about the defendants and their products.A full law would be nice to have, but in the meantime, having the FTC step in seems like a useful tool to stop these gag clauses from silencing consumers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ftc, gag clause, non-disparagement clauses
Companies: roca labs
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Paging Jack Nicholson...
You can't handle the truth!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It sounds like an hyperbole, but it is actually an accurate description of the situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same FTC filing as the other day. Someone simply found another phrase worth quoting?
Ah, no, wait. This is about a blog post about the court filing. Much better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Slamming Roca's all well and good, as they've more than earned it, but having the FTC start paying attention to gag clauses, whether Roca's or otherwise is much more important in the long-term.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's gotta sting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That's gotta sting
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]