Russia 'Investigating' Apple Over The Diabolical Menace That Is LGBT-Friendly Emojis
from the sanctioned-bigotry dept
Russia's been nothing but busy since passing its 2013 LGBT propaganda law, designed to protect minors from the terrifying menace of "propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships" while upholding "family values" through government-encouraged discrimination and hatred. The law has had two major benefits for the Russian government; allowing Putin and friends to use homophobia to encourage distrust of heathens in the West (at the cost of increased violence against the LGBT community), while providing feeble justification for the country's heavy-handed censorship efforts.Most attempted enforcement of the law is comical in nature, like the government's apparent decision recently to "investigate" Apple for violating the law with a several-year-old set of LGBT-friendly....emojis (which Apple included back in iOS update 8.3). The "investigation" was apparently prompted by a Russian lawyer by the name of Yaroslav Mikhailov, who has previously had political opposition journalists investigated for their comical posts to Instagram:
"The case, brought by police in Russia's Kirov region 600 miles northeast of Moscow, follows a complaint by a local attorney named Yaroslav Mikhailov, Russian newspaper Gazeta reported. Mikhailov argued that that Apple is violating Russia's ban on so-called "gay propaganda" in the presence of minors by including the emojis in the iOs 8.3 package. The case, opened last month, is awaiting expert analysis of the cartoon motifs to determine whether they count as "gay propaganda," the newspaper reported.According to an older report by Russia's Izvestia newspaper, the investigation was also prompted by a complaint from Mikhail Marchenko, a Russian senator who apparently believes the more racially diverse and LGBT-inclusive emojis somehow "disrespect" traditional families:
"Mr Marchenko claims the symbols - which depict smiley-faced same-sex couples - violate a controversial 2013 law which prohibits promotion of non-traditional sexual relationships. The law allows Russian authorities to block access to websites deemed to promote homosexuality. Mr Marchenko said in his complaint that the emojis "promoted non-traditional sexual relationships", "denied family values" and showed "disrespect for parents and other family members."These are, apparently, the moral-fabric-eroding cartoon representations that have some so deeply, deeply offended:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: emoji, investigation, lgbt, propaganda, russia
Companies: apple
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why is this even a thing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Insert Sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another example...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Protecting the Sanctity of Traditional Bigotry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's banned in Germany and a couple other individual countries within Europe.
In any case how do you equate the Nazi symbol, under which millions were killed, with an icon of a same-sex couple? It's like claiming "As long as slavery is banned in the US I cant really argue against banning encryption."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Banning speech is banning speech. What the symbol represents is irrelevant. What matters is that it's a government going "We don't like this symbol, it is now banned. Anyone who uses it will face a court of law."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Homophobia?
I do see homosexism, which, like racism, is "prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different sexual orientation based on the belief that one's own sexual orientation is superior."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
:P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
In any case, I think Russia needs to take this up with the Unicode group -- Apple is just implementing characters in that character set.
As for the swastika... I'm sure I've got some quilts around with a swastika pattern on them (different colors) as that was a pretty common quilting pattern before the Nazis got their hands on it. It was also a religious symbol that had nothing to do with Aryan ideals. I prefer reclaiming symbols for society to banning them, as it tends to result in changed attitudes instead of suppressed counter-cultural behavior.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
People aren't objectively supremacist; they acquire their supremacy though the culture they live in and the cultural values they believe and associate to themselves.
Fear has been the driving factor behind much of public distaste for Homosexuality: ie: 'Homosexuals are all Pedophiles' and 'Homosexuals all inspire sin'.
Something tells me you're a troll, so I'm done with this comment. Go back to The Internet Research Co.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The rhetorical question at the end is kind of a trick question...it could evoke having to read the Russian law correctly through no american-media filters.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Sep 29th, 2015 @ 2:53pm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
There is a single point where this post could have had some relevant critique for the OP, but it was missed entirely since the attack on non-nationalistic people was more important than reasoning.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I thought she was doing ballet, but yes, totally hot..!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Insert Sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Homophobia?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You could, y'know, oppose both the banning of the swastika in some countries in Europe AND Russia's horrible homophobic policies. Just a thought.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Why not? I have no problem arguing against both things, since they are really the same thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Is, not was. Last year a got a wall hanging as a gift from a friend in India. It depicts Ganesh and has swastikas in the corners. Those swastikas are being used in their religious context and have nothing to do with Nazis.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Homophobia?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Don't the arms go the opposite direction of the Nazi symbol?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]