The FCC's Issuing More Fines Than Ever, But Taking Heat For Not Collecting Them
from the words-are-but-wind dept
While nobody expected much of former cable and wireless industry lobbyist turned FCC boss Tom Wheeler, he's actually been doing a relatively good job when it comes to standing up to entrenched broadband duopolists. From passing tougher net neutrality rules to taking aim at state level protectionist broadband law, he's often been on the side of the end user and actual competition. That has included an ocean of fines for fraud that, while wrist slaps for the bigger companies involved, have spearheaded a crack down on the kinds of behavior the FCC spent fifteen years pretending didn't exist.AT&T has born the brunt of the FCC's fiery new disposition, be it a $100 million fine for lying about throttling, a $100 million fine for milking a subsidy fund reserved for the poor, a $105 million fine for allowing and aiding SMS cramming, or a $18 million settlement for defrauding the IP Relay program for the hearing impaired (noticing a trend at AT&T yet?).
But while the agency has been making a lot of media waves with some major fines over the last few years, it has also been taking criticism for not doing a particularly good job collecting the money owed. The collection process is notoriously slow, thanks in large part to expected company challenges (which have to occur 30 days after the fine is announced). But in some cases, companies that were found to be ripping off the government years ago not only haven't paid a dime, but are still eligible to collect subsidies:
"In announcing some of the proposed Lifeline fines in 2013, the agency trumpeted, “Today's actions constitute the most recent step in the Commission's significant efforts to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in the Lifeline program and preserve the overall integrity of the Universal Service Fund (USF).” But the FCC has yet to officially impose the penalty on those companies -- and several are still deemed eligible to receive FCC reimbursements for phone subsidies, according to data from the Universal Service Administrative Company, which runs Lifeline.In other words, historically-flimsy wrist slaps are notably more flimsy when there's no actual slap involved. That said, the FCC has responded with a blog post in which it argues it collected 88.6% of the fines levied in 2015, up notably from the 55% collected in 2011, and the 39.2% collected in 2012. So not only are the number of fines being issued up, so is the rate of collection under Wheeler. The FCC also tries to argue that the bad press can sometimes be enough to get companies to change their behavior:
"...a spokesperson said the practice of issuing proposed fines -- technically called notices of apparent liability (NALs) -- is a major tool to protect consumers, even if companies don’t ultimately pay a full penalty. The FCC, which says it normally conducts extensive inquiries before proposing a fine, has seen instances of companies adjusting practices to comply with agency rules after an NAL is filed, said the spokesperson, who declined to be identified, saying the FCC has a policy about not speaking on the record about its enforcement bureau."Note too that some of the Congressional criticism on this front is ironic posturing. Many of the complaints emerged at a recent series of House hearings designed to publicly scold the FCC for standing up to broadband ISPs on net neutrality, with the end goal of stripping the agency of both funding and authority. Odd, then, that these same folks are concerned the FCC somehow isn't being aggressive enough despite actually in some ways being more aggressive than ever. Still, critics are right to note that while the number of fines the FCC is issuing is higher than ever, the roar of a lion eventually becomes somewhat less imposing when followed by a toothless smile.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: consumer protection, fcc, fines
Companies: at&t, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"You'll pay, one way or another..."
If the companies have yet to pay back the full amount of their fines, then either suspend completely their eligibility for subsidies until they've paid the fines, or subtract the amount they can get from the subsidy amounts they would have gotten.
Owe $100 million, and eligible for a $100 million reimbursement? Congrats, they get nothing, though on the plus side their balance is now clear, and they'll be eligible for future reimbursements, should they be in line to receive them and aren't on the hook for more fines at that time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Short Term Memory
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Good to know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "You'll pay, one way or another..."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: "You'll pay, one way or another..."
The FCC wouldn't even have to go to their offices. They could just revoke some the licenses to some of the wireless spectrum AT&T holds and auction it off. AT&T would shit it's pants.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: "You'll pay, one way or another..."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Let's see the stats on the number of PR penalties announced versus actual total penalties collected.
I'll wager it isn't anywhere near 80+%.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wink wink nudge nudge
But then, we'll say no more about it, say no more. Get it? Know what I mean, know what I mean? [wink, wink, nudge, nudge]
And I bet you'll still be enjoying those subsidies, won't you, won't you? Know what I mean, know what I mean? [wink, wink, nudge, nudge]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: "You'll pay, one way or another..."
Which is why it won't happen.
The FCC speaks loudly but carries a small twig.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A modest proposal ... sort of
[Note: For the humor impaired, This is Satire. However, it also makes for pleasant wishful thinking.]
[ link to this | view in thread ]