UK Government Has Secretly Created A Huge Database Storing Details About Its Citizens' Private Lives -- Since 2000
from the database?-what-database? dept
Long before the vast planetary surveillance programs being carried out by the Five Eyes team were revealed by Edward Snowden, there was Echelon, a similarly globe-spanning system for slurping up communications. The person who did more than anyone to expose this top-secret collaboration was the UK journalist Duncan Campbell:
In 1988, he revealed the existence of the ECHELON project, which has since 1997 become controversial throughout the world. In 1998, he was asked by the European Parliament to report on the development of surveillance technology and the risk of abuse of economic information, especially in relation to the ECHELON system. His report, “Interception Capabilities 2000” was approved by the European Parliament in April 1999, and presented to the parliament in Brussels in February 2000. In July 2000, the European Parliament appointed a committee of 36 MEPs to further investigate the ECHELON system.
The MEPs wrote another report, "on the existence of a global system for the interception of private and commercial communications (ECHELON interception system)", which was presented in July 2001. It would doubtless have created some pretty big waves in the EU had not the attack on the Twin Towers a few months later meant that nobody wanted to be seen weakening the intelligence services. The report was filed and Echelon was forgotten -- and carried on as before. A new article by Campbell published in The Register shows that around the same time that most politicians lost interest in exposing mass surveillance, the UK government was busily building another, highly-intrusive monitoring system that was only acknowledged very recently:
Finally, on November 4th [2015], the Home Office took the lid off what had been going on secretly since 2000. Asking Parliament to allow mass surveillance of telephone records to continue, Home Secretary Theresa May admitted that "under Section 94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 ... successive governments have approved the security and intelligence agencies' access" to [bulk] communications data from communication service providers", claiming that it helped MI5 "thwart a number of attacks here in the UK".
According to Campbell, that "bulk communications data" includes detailed records of telephone calls, health records, personal credit card and banking transactions, flight bookings and internet records. As he points out, the fact that all this data was being gathered secretly meant that repeated -- and heated -- Parliamentary debates about whether it should be collected, conducted in the belief that currently it was not, were a complete sham:
MPs and peers spent months arguing about a pretence, and in ignorance of the cost and human rights implications of what successive governments were doing in secret.
As well as duplicity, that bespeaks a stunning contempt on the part of the UK government for both Parliament and the public. That indifference to people's concerns is also manifest in the latest attempt to bring in a Snooper's Charter, officially known as the Investigatory Powers Bill. Campbell points out that the only response from the UK authorities to widespread fears about the creation of a huge, intrusive database recording key aspects of UK citizens' lives is to pretend it doesn't exist:
Vigilance on behalf of liberty has had little discernible impact, except in the field of semantics. Across 299 pages in the new Investigatory Powers Bill, the word "database" does not appear once.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Billions of call and internet records, stolen financial data, intercepted travel records, a heap of bulk personal datasets on matters including religion, racial or ethnic origin, political views, medical condition, sexual orientation, or legally privileged, journalistic or otherwise confidential information, all joined up together and archived in secret do not constitute a "database", whatever techie readers may think. And that's official.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: citizens, dossiers, echelon, privacy, surveillance, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How long before this data is used against political opponents?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How long before this data is used against political opponents?
But we really need to not be delicate: "If it exists, there is porn of it"
By the same token, if there is a trove of data useful for spying on ones unrequited loves, or ones competitors, or ones business or political enemies, AND IT EXISTS NOW then one can (with close to 100% accuracy) be comfortable stating that IT HAS BEEN ALREADY USED IN THAT WAY.
Many times.
And will be used in that way constantly, for as long as it exists.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Hate to godwyn but it worked very well for Hitler leading up to his total takeover of Germany
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How long before this data is used against political opponents?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: How long before this data is used against political opponents?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DPR... UK
Not that subsequent governments can claim any sort of moral high ground, of course.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
UK Government is NOT a Government but
http://aus911truth.blogspot.com/2014/05/govisco-governments-are-companies.html
along with so many other countries' Governments.
Their task is to MAKE PROFIT by ripping us off and poison us so that their mates in fraudulent pharma and medical industries will make profit too.
Citizens of the world have gotta wake up to this bottom deceit and fight back NOW.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We'll be receiving details about these numerous thwarted attacks shortly, I'm sure? Just like in the US, when it was first claimed that 50+ terrorist attacks had been stopped... which then became 12 terrorist attacks... which then became 2... which then became a cabbie sending $8,500 to Somalia.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dirt on citizens
In the USA, there used to be a show called "Laugh In" and Lily Tomlin played a character who routinely took the mickey out of Edgar Hoover (former head of the FBI) who was known for blackmailing citizens to gain his political will. Her tag line was "There is nothing like a Hoover when you are dealing with dirty."
Nothing like dirt, I guess, no matter which side of the pond you are manipulating.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dirt on citizens
In the USA, there used to be a show called "Laugh In" and Lily Tomlin played a character who routinely took the mickey out of Edgar Hoover (former head of the FBI) who was known for blackmailing citizens to gain his political will. Her tag line was "There is nothing like a Hoover when you are dealing with dirty."
Nothing like dirt, I guess, no matter which side of the pond you are manipulating.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I have a hard time seeing venal, power hungry, sadists becoming masochistic self destructors consuming their own and themselves. They will always want more, not less, so if the populace tells the government that they are no longer afraid of terrorists, except those in the government, then the government will just become more sadistic. That circle makes sense, it's not good, but it makes sense.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Have a wonderfull surveillanced day!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This and
Makes the world a very stupid place..
Anyone with a number to the Alien world, please post it..
Rather live in a Zoo, then deal with the idiots here..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]