AT&T Is Happy To Remove Wireless Broadband Caps, But Only If You Sign Up For Its TV Services
from the witness-this-fully-armed-and-operational-battle-station dept
We're formally now bearing witness to the "synergistic" fruit of AT&T's $69 billion recent acquisition of DirecTV. When the deal was first proposed, even Wall Street wondered why AT&T would spend that kind of money on a satellite TV provider on the eve of the cord cutting revolution. But AT&T has a very clear plan of attack, and as we recently noted, its first move post merger was to raise the rates of DirecTV and AT&T U-Verse TV customers in perfect unison. Now AT&T has added a new wrinkle to its post-merger plans, bringing back unlimited wireless broadband data -- but only if you sign up for the company's television services.According to a new company announcement, customers who sign up for both AT&T wireless service and AT&T U-Verse TV or DirecTV service can nab unlimited data for $100 per month, plus $40 per month for each additional device:
"The new AT&T Unlimited Plan includes unlimited data and unlimited talk and text. Customers can get the AT&T Unlimited Plan on a smartphone for $100 per month. Additional smartphones are $40 per month each, and a fourth smartphone can be added at no additional cost. The new AT&T Unlimited Plan is the first of many integrated video and mobility offers the company plans to announce in 2016."Note your mileage may vary as to whether this is actually a good deal. For instance this plan requires users pay $40 a month to add a tablet to the plan, which is only $10 a month if you remain on AT&T's metered data plans. Obviously many users won't be able to take advantage of the offer if they're not within AT&T's U-Verse fiber-to-the-node TV service footprint, or can't get a clear shot at DirecTV's satellites.
AT&T's move is just the latest in a long saga involving unlimited data. AT&T announced it was eliminating unlimited data plans in 2010. And while it grandfathered existing unlimited data users at the time, it has waged a quiet war on those users ever since. The company worked tirelessly to drive these users to metered plans, going so far as to block some video services from working unless users switched to metered plans. The company was also caught throttling these unlimited connections after just 5 GB of usage, resulting in an FCC fine and an FTC lawsuit that AT&T continues to fight to this day.
After its run in with regulators, AT&T's been slightly more transparent about the fact its unlimited data plans aren't truly unlimited. In the fine print of this week's offer, AT&T is quick to note that again, by "unlimited" AT&T really means limited:
"After 22GB of data usage on a line in a bill cycle, for the remainder of the bill cycle AT&T may slow data speeds on that line during periods of network congestion."Obviously AT&T wants users to believe this is a wonderful example of how AT&T intends to deliver cross-brand value, and to some degree the move is a response to T-Mobile's competitive pressure. However, when you realize that usage caps are largely arbitrary and not tied to any real-world technical or economic justifications, AT&T's basically just using artificial barriers to drive consumers to its own branded products. With AT&T's ongoing flirtations with testing net neutrality via zero rating, one can only imagine some of the dubious cross-brand "synergies" AT&T has planned for 2016.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband caps, bundles, tv
Companies: at&t
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I tried to parse that and my brain threw an exception. Either this is a typo or I'm missing some important context.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tethering
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Tethering
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hey! Everyone sign up! We are the good guys!
"Yeah, remember how we said it unlimited with U-Verse, we had our fingers crossed."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I tried to parse that and my brain threw an exception. Either this is a typo or I'm missing some important context.
------------------------------------------------------
AT&T's current model works like this:
You pay for a certain level of base service (minutes, text, data). Based on the tier of base service, adding on additional lines costs a fixed fee per month to use that base service. Assuming unlimited minutes/texts and fixed set of data, adding a phone costs ~$15/month and a data-only device (i.e. a tablet) costs $10/month.
So if you stay on a metered plan and pay $100/month for your phone, and want to add your tablet, it'll cost you an additional $10.
If you have an unlimited plan and pay $150/month for your phone, and want to add your tablet, it'll cost you an additional $40.
In short, you pay more to have the option of unlimited* data on a device, then $40 (as opposed to $10) per additional device.
Make sense now?
*where unlimited != unlimited
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Agree to unlimited payment
I will pay the agreed upon price, but after paying $40 per month, all additional payment for the month will be at the rate of $.01 per day until the balance is paid off (no interest or penalties can be applied). Should AT&T Terms and conditions change at any time, all outstanding balances become zero and the payment plan starts over under the new terms with the same conditions.
Sounds fair and "unlimited" to me as AT&T will continue to receive daily payments for an unlimited amount of time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Be Smart....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
's what ya get for not doing rigorous enough error handling in your lexical analyzer. Of course, if you'd have been just a bit lazier, you would have simply rebooted and and used your 'that's nice honey' filter, without interpreting it at all!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Data caps are plain and simple technological regression.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's not all...
I know, our location lost the contract and we're done soon.
So that "highest customer satisfaction" rating they have - yah, that's going to plummet. Over the past 2 months we had begun to hear A LOT of customers complaining the over seas folks were rude, didn't know how to fix problems, hung up on customers, refused to let customers talk to supervisors, were cursed out and then hung up one, etc...
and of course the typical "Can't speak English, I can't understand them!" complaints.
AT&T will -RUIN- DirecTV's ratings - like everything else they touch they are turning it to complete sh*t.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If you sign up for AT&T's shared and metered data plan, you pay $10 a month to add your tablet to your shared data allotment. But if you're an unlimited data customer, you pay AT&T $40 a month for this same thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
God I'm so sick of these broadband companies and their constant dishonesty. Can't the FCC or someone put a stop to this kind of bullshit?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is a Cable TV story, Not A Mobile Phone Story
The only customers who would get the most out of this (i.e. the cord and cable cutters) are the ones who are specifically NOT included in the offer. This offer is more likely to tip some customers towards an AT&T TV subscription versus a competing cable or Dish Network offer.
In the end, this offer is more about competing in the cable TV sector than the mobile phone sector.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jobs Circular BD
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bdjobs Today
[ link to this | view in thread ]