Washington Post Charges An 'Activation' Fee To Let You Pay Them To Get Around Their Paywall
from the how-nice dept
We're still pretty skeptical about paywalls for most newspapers, because they really tend to limit the audience for your offering, and limit people sharing that content as well (which is pretty important for growing your audience these days). But, some newspapers have really embraced them, including the Washington Post, which lately has ramped up its paywall efforts. And, apparently with that, come sneaky fees. First noticed by an editor at the WSJ (another paywall site, though one that has been designed to be much more porous), Tim Hanrahan, it appears that the Washington Post now has an "activation fee" to subscribe to get around the paywall:Is an "activation fee" new for print @washingtonpost subscriptions? Guessing is a way to deter gaming. pic.twitter.com/REmydIPy2a
— Tim Hanrahan (@TimJHanrahan) August 26, 2016
Of course, we also wondered, all the way back in 2004, when these kinds of bogus fees would start spreading to other businesses.
"Perhaps other companies should get into this game as well. Want a pizza pie? It's just $3, but there's a $3.50 "crust fee," a $9.38 "oven fee," a $4.50 "service fee," and a $2.18 "cleanup fee." Plus tax."Not too many other businesses have gone down that road... but I guess the Washington Post has decided to leap in head first.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: activation fee, fees, journalism, paywall, sneaky fees
Companies: washington post
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
bogus fees on pizza
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
legal thievery
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: bogus fees on pizza
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Papa Johns $2 delivery fee which doesn' go to the driver :-(
http://www.ppc.bz/random/papa-johns-2-delivery-fee
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just wait
[ link to this | view in thread ]
try bying an airline ticket
[ link to this | view in thread ]
$10.75 a WEEK for the news after 3 months?!
Screw the activation fee, what the HELL is that about?!
I pay less than that for my smartphone plan.
In fact, lets list a few things I'd rather do with that money each month than subscribe to a pretentious news site.
-I could go to 2 all you an eat buffet lunches for 3 hours a piece.
-I could subscribe to 3 subscription based MMO's.
-I could buy 2 bags of flavored pipe tobacco.
-I could get subscriptions to Humble Bundle Monthly, Crunchyroll AND Netflix
Who the hell is wasting over $40 bucks a month on news that, lets face it, is or will soon be freely accessible elsewhere? Who?!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Of course they do
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: legal thievery
Yes, Regulation is working so fucking well! There is so much false advertising going on the FTC will never get around to them all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sign up for free - pay for it forever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just wait
Corporations can come up with any old "policy" they want and force us to do things their way because they have the leverage. We have few places (sometimes only one) where we can do business. If we choose to stop doing business with one because we don't like their policies (or prices or whatever), then we suffer a real loss. But if a business loses just one customer out of millions like this, they barely notice.
The government should be the entity that balances this playing field, since they could represent consumers en masse, but it doesn't work out that way.
The politician who figures out how to do this will change the world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I handed back the receipt and told them to keep their pizza. Since I hadn't paid yet, I just walked out. And I've never been back. (and no, the sign didn't mention anything about "drive through.")
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I had to go to court to get a CompuServe account closed. I learned a lot about auto-debit and EFT regulations during that little show.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Haiku
To pay another lame fee
Insane just insane
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: try bying an airline ticket
How about that 200% in extra charges?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's an upgrade
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Time for another cliche
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nothing really special here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: legal thievery
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WaPo has a huge whole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]