The State Department Has Taken Over Three Years On A FOIA Request About How Long It Takes To Process FOIA Requests
from the they're-just-messing-with-us dept
Back in 2013, a young Shawn Musgrave filed a FOIA request with the State Department for its cables regarding former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. To his surprise, he was given an estimated completion date (ECD) of December 2015 -- a full 18 months of processing time.
Curious about where the agency got that oddly specific number from -- and with plenty of time on his hands -- Shawn filed a follow-up request for any documentation outlining State's methodology for estimating FOIA completion dates. This is on August 5th, 2013, and he gets an acknowledgement back August 8th, just three days later.
Don't get used to that kind of timeliness.
Two months later, he's given his first ECD for this request -- December 2013.
Only a few months of processing, perfectly reasonable for operational manuals that FOIA officers should have easily accessible.
Except apparently not, because come December, he's given a new ECD -- May 2014.
Well, okay, we should cut them some slack -- as they said, there are extenuating factors, and if they feel they need another five months, that shouldn't be too big of a deal, so long as they-
Oh, you've got to be kidding.
December 2014. A full year since the initial filing. Alright, not great, but how much longer could it take, really?
Oh, come on! Now you're just being ridiculous, State -- the original ECD for the Thatcher docs was February 2015. How could this be a month harder to process than that? Why not just go ahead and take the rest of the year if you're feeling swamped.
Wait, no, it was a joke, don't-
Nooooooo. Why are you doing this? Are you just messing with us?
You are just messing us, aren't you!
Come on, that's not even a date!
Alright, that's better.
Wait, no it's not, that's actually much worse -- how could you possibly need until June? You finally released the Thatcher docs that started this whole mess in May!
... Are we dead? Is this Hell?
Noooooooooooooo
It's October 2016. Shawn Musgrave is a sadder and a wiser man. And we are still waiting for the State Department to tell us how long it takes to process its FOIA requests.
Maybe we'll wait forever. Maybe we've always been waiting.
Or maybe the State Department can hire some new FOIA officers already. Jeez.
Republished from Muckrock
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: estimates, foia, state department
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But we see how that is working out.
Telescreens with cameras and mics come in: handheld size, tablet size, laptop size, and sixty inch full telescreen size.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are we? I think we kind of got our answer: too damn long! (So don't even ask)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clinton's mess
Now let's take a guess how her administration would look? Super transparent....or not?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Clinton's mess
Get ready to grab your ankles Merika.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But how many years would it take . . .
Probably not O(n).
But could it be O(n^x) or maybe O( n ^ x ^ y ) ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: But how many years would it take . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Until we stop voting R or D and focusing on the President instead of Congress, this shit will keep on keeping on! Enjoy your day at the polls suckers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But they don't.
Half the voters are below average intelligence. They like a reality TV based election system. As long as the candidates seem angry about the same things and make them feel good about their miserable lives.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So that leaves who? Johnson & Stein.(LOL'd more.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil and I can't bring myself to do that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Question their procedures, that's worse.
You're already considered trouble when you file a FOIA request.
Go meta and you're bound to bureaucracy hell.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(ECD) 2 days.
See you in 3 Years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]