Freedom Of Information Lawsuit Results In NYPD Agreeing To Follow FOI Law
from the lol-'law-enforcers' dept
If you need any more proof the NYPD hates transparency, you need look no further than Keegan Stephan's victory in a Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) lawsuit:
Big win! To settle my lawsuit, NYPD has agreed to comply with critical component of NY Freedom of Information law: https://t.co/Pgldj018j5 pic.twitter.com/FLP9Xalmhh
— Keegan Stephan (@KeeganNYC) June 29, 2017
If you can't see the tweet, it says:
Big win! To settle my lawsuit, NYPD has agreed to comply with critical component of NY Freedom of Information law
This is what we measure success with when it comes to FOIL and the NYPD: a victory is the department AGREEING TO FOLLOW THE LAW.
Stephan has been seeking information on the department's use of a sound cannon for crowd control. The NYPD, of course, had no interest in releasing these records. Central to the settlement is the department agreeing to accept FOI requests by email, something it's supposed to have been doing for more than a decade.
The man, Keegan Stephan, said in the suit that the department failed to justify withholding the records he requested and that a “policy and practice” not to accept or respond to Freedom of Information requests by email violated a 2006 provision of New York State law. Mr. Stephan also argued that by not allowing email requests, the police had increased “the time, effort, and expense involved” in obtaining records.
The department's settlement contains no admission of wrongdoing -- something common to government lawsuit settlements. This means it will accept zero responsibility for a decade-long run of FOI statute violations.
The "new" email request system will aid more New Yorkers in having their requests ignored by the NYPD. The NYPD's future use of email for FOI responses will ensure requesters are informed of denials in a much speedier fashion. The portal the NYPD is setting up on its website will provide instructions for requesters, as well as information on how to challenge denials and non-responses. If nothing else, the NYPD will be forced to follow the letter of the law a bit more closely, but it will take far more than a steady stream of FOI lawsuits for it to approach the law's spirit.
The NYPD has made a opacity a cottage industry. It has been dubbed the least responsive government agency in the US, worse than the CIA, FBI and NSA. It has developed an in-house classification system that allows pretty much anyone to designate almost any document "top secret" for almost any reason, and reached its nadir when it refused to release a copy of its FOIL response guidelines to a FOIL requester.
But this is an ugly victory -- one that should subject the department to a steady stream of ridicule. It takes a lawsuit to make a law enforcement agency follow the law. That's just depressing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: foia, freedom of information, new york, nypd, open records, transparency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
NYPD become expert quackers
I am betting the hubris of the NYPD will enable them to set up an auto-response to emails sent the the request address that incorporates the denial, so they don't waste any person-hours on responding.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This should be used in criminal court
Likewise, it ought to be defense gold...a pattern and practice of "hiding the ball"!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: NYPD become expert quackers
'What happens when it rains on a duck? The water rolls right off.'
Live & learn. I always thought it was 'The duck puts you in a sleeper hold til you pass out & die, and manages to get away with it despite there being plenty of witnesses and video evidence.'
The 'rolling off' thing is good too. More succinct.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This should be used in criminal court
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Correction:
It takes a lawsuit to make a law enforcement agency take the prescribed route for ignoring the law.
Just because you can now email a request does not mean that it gets answered, timely or otherwise.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
SERIOUSLY? Tim posts the tweet as large as day and unless you're blind, posting that warning indicator means that Tim thinks every person reading his article is as stupid as he is.
It's time that Techdirt make their website comply with ADA laws by including an audio of each article as well. Perhaps they'll put a warning on that also: click button if you are blind.
ROTFL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: NYPD fakers
Geeez, how naive can you get!
we know that the NYPD "agreeing" to anything ... is meaningless. NYPD is fundamentally dishonest & untrustworthy-- Mafia Dons have more personal integrity when giving their word
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"a victory is the department AGREEING TO FOLLOW THE LAW."
I think a victory will be the department actually complying with the law.
If, in a year, we see a sound record of them consistently responding to FOIL requests with provided records, that's victory. That's progress.
But until their words are followed with action, their agreement is probably a lie.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Take it up with him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]