Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the anonymous-schmanonymous dept
We've got a double-winner this week, taking first place on both the insightful and funny sides. The comment came from kallethen in response to the State Department's strange and worrying attempt to spark a fake Twitter feud about the history of intellectual property in America, and pointed out that one of their prime examples was a strange choice:
Okay, is anybody else laughing at how they picked Ben Franklin as an example? Who, as I recall, did not seek to patent his inventions because he believed all should benefit by them?
In second place on the insightful side, we've got a response to AT&T's claim that people can simply choose not to have broadband. One anonymous commenter pointed out the company's own assertion that this isn't true:
AT&T's own commercial: "Food. Water. Internet. We need it to live."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqdahzSUNL4
Sorry for linking an AT&T ad.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we start out with one more response to the State Department's propaganda plans, from an anonymous commenter who decided to play along:
Linus Torvalds made an open source operating system #MostAmericanIP
Jonas Salk eschewed $7bn and gave away the polio vaccine #MostAmericanIP
(Though as was quickly pointed out, Torvalds in fact created a kernel, not an OS. But the point still stands.)
Next, we've got a solid anonymous response to the all-or-nothing debates about "regulation" that some commenters try constantly to instigate:
Very few people supports absolute anarchy and very few people supports regulation that codifies every little detail.
With that in mind:
"pro regulation" and "no regulation" are mostly just rhetorics, with no value for specific topics. They are sufficiently unspecific to rally around like "change" and "make america great again" to not be a hinderance for dumbing down a discussion and beating the adversary on experience!
Over on the funny side, we've already had our first place winner above, so we head to second place where an anonymous commenter got understandably catty about constant demands from some commenters that we cover different topics that they think are more important:
You're free to start your own blog. You can call it. Neckbeards and fedoras. A users guide to the internet.
For editor's choice on the funny side, since it's been a very strong week for anonymous commenters so far, we continue with one more anonymous response to AT&T:
As a parent, I don't force my children to eat the dinner I make. They have options: take it or leave it.
What do you mean you are going to call the Department of Social Services about my starving children...
And finally, in our only entry from a logged-in user this week, we've got stderric with a comment for which I won't supply the context because it works in so many situations where someone has gone on a paranoid rant seeing political assertions that aren't there:
The post would make a lot more sense to you if you could read it in Standard American English rather than Regional Paranoid Lunatic.
That's all for this week, folks!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Re: Torvalds in fact created a kernel, not an OS
“On top of the operating system is the rest of the system software. Here we find the command interpreter (shell), window systems, compilers, editors, and similar application-independent programs. It is important to realize that these programs are definitely not part of the operating system, even though they are typically supplied preinstalled by the computer manufacturer, or in a package with the operating system if it is installed after purchase. This is a crucial, but subtle, point. The operating system is (usually) that portion of the software that runs in kernel mode or supervisor mode. It is protected from user tampering by the hardware ...”
-- Tanenbaum & Woodhull, Operating Systems Design And Implementation, third edition, page 3
That is the well-known “MINIX Book”, by the way. So you see, by that definition, Linux is very definitely an ”operating system”.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Torvalds in fact created a kernel, not an OS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Torvalds in fact created a kernel, not an OS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Torvalds in fact created a kernel, not an OS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But thanks for the reference; that's worth thinking about, and I'll keep it in mind next time I want to pull out the old "Well, actually..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
#SuomiIP
Why american IP ?
I guess Linus created his kernel based on Minix when he still was a finnish student.
His M.Sc. thesis was titled
"Linux: A Portable Operating System."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: #SuomiIP
I suppose you could argue that the license he chose to publish it under is American IP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not so Anonymous
BTW, my children did eat their breakfast this morning, there wasn't any other choice. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm finally a somebody!
Sorry for not knowing the distinction between kernel and operating system, but I did look him up before claiming he was American. "Linus Benedict Torvalds is a Finnish-American software engineer ..."
Jonas Salk was first who sprang to mind when thinking about giving away intellectual property. Tim Berners-Lee was second, but he's not American. I really struggled to come up with other recognizable personalities who gave away their IP. Who did I miss?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I really struggled to come up with other recognizable personalities who gave away their IP. Who did I miss?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]